Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Horizon - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Milwaukee 1,538.2524 1,541.9096 1,540.0799 53.01 57.44 0.106
2nd Wright St. 1,503.5248 1,506.4543 1,504.9888 53.61 55.21 0.065
3rd Northern Ky. 1,481.1621 1,483.9995 1,482.5801 50.10 55.32 0.070
4th UIC 1,439.3646 1,441.3414 1,440.3527 49.71 51.52 0.010
5th Green Bay 1,383.6354 1,388.0648 1,385.8483 49.79 49.87 -0.033
6th Purdue Fort Wayne 1,373.1459 1,376.4681 1,374.8060 47.10 49.34 -0.044
7th Oakland 1,366.3910 1,379.5774 1,372.9684 51.45 47.74 -0.006
8th Cleveland St. 1,334.8960 1,336.5650 1,335.7303 44.06 47.38 -0.105
9th IUPUI 1,301.4810 1,304.7607 1,303.1198 46.01 43.69 -0.133
10th Youngstown St. 1,293.9711 1,299.5934 1,296.7792 44.79 45.38 -0.110
11th Robert Morris 1,290.7004 1,297.0587 1,293.8757 47.03 46.58 -0.126

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Milwaukee 0.2874 42.13 13.40 39.44 43.08 6.45 7.34
2nd Northern Ky. 0.2449 38.55 14.05 35.14 47.68 5.50 6.22
3rd UIC 0.2269 38.20 15.51 35.48 45.97 6.11 7.50
4th Wright St. 0.2146 34.31 12.85 31.18 51.73 6.03 5.69
5th Purdue Fort Wayne 0.1963 36.09 16.46 33.40 48.96 6.00 6.56
6th Green Bay 0.1899 34.96 15.97 32.59 49.70 6.49 7.93
7th Oakland 0.1892 33.14 14.22 29.43 53.23 5.29 5.92
8th Youngstown St. 0.1704 32.65 15.61 30.61 52.56 6.33 8.02
9th Robert Morris 0.1602 31.40 15.37 28.59 54.12 6.40 8.25
10th Cleveland St. 0.1529 33.36 18.07 30.87 49.43 6.75 6.78
11th IUPUI 0.1102 30.96 19.94 28.36 52.94 6.99 8.42

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wright St. 0.1499 29.49 14.51 27.07 57.16 5.50 3.77
2nd Northern Ky. 0.1747 33.36 15.90 30.69 50.90 7.19 3.36
3rd Milwaukee 0.1810 33.10 15.00 30.81 53.63 4.73 5.55
4th Oakland 0.1951 34.64 15.12 31.19 49.76 5.49 6.47
5th UIC 0.2167 36.34 14.67 33.22 50.48 5.62 4.53
6th Green Bay 0.2230 36.37 14.07 33.44 49.56 5.18 7.05
7th Purdue Fort Wayne 0.2406 38.41 14.35 35.73 47.96 5.44 6.49
8th IUPUI 0.2432 38.14 13.82 35.68 47.54 5.08 7.90
9th Cleveland St. 0.2580 39.50 13.70 36.36 45.57 5.08 7.85
10th Youngstown St. 0.2802 40.19 12.17 36.54 47.98 3.60 8.60
11th Robert Morris 0.2858 42.95 14.37 38.71 43.55 5.07 7.54

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,393.7390 1,388.5748 1,385.0579 1,381.9411 1,387.3282
Difference -5.1642 -8.6811 -11.7979 -8.5477

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wright St. 120 2,531 1,360 144 192 53.73 17.6 13.2 2,204 1,006 102 224 54.36 21.6 9.8
Milwaukee 115 2,525 1,325 179 185 52.48 14.1 13.6 2,141 952 136 189 55.54 15.7 11.3
Northern Ky. 106 2,252 1,126 139 201 50.00 16.2 11.2 2,096 971 88 196 53.67 23.8 10.7
Green Bay 122 2,496 1,288 211 292 51.60 11.8 8.5 2,530 1,270 196 206 49.80 12.9 12.3
UIC 125 2,673 1,335 203 272 49.94 13.2 9.8 2,622 1,293 138 200 50.69 19.0 13.1
Robert Morris 114 2,123 1,079 220 264 50.82 9.7 8.0 2,332 1,217 192 236 47.81 12.1 9.9
Oakland 111 2,092 1,070 131 172 51.15 16.0 12.2 2,219 1,175 165 198 47.05 13.4 11.2
Purdue Fort Wayne 120 2,352 1,121 168 221 47.66 14.0 10.6 2,490 1,273 195 211 48.88 12.8 11.8
Youngstown St. 106 2,055 971 170 205 47.25 12.1 10.0 2,333 1,268 216 213 45.65 10.8 11.0
Cleveland St. 106 1,934 884 141 169 45.71 13.7 11.4 2,160 1,149 197 261 46.81 11.0 8.3
IUPUI 108 2,053 968 184 236 47.15 11.2 8.7 2,442 1,384 212 219 43.33 11.5 11.2
Conference Average 114 2,281 1,139 172 219 49.77 13.6 10.7 2,324 1,178 167 214 49.42 15.0 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Horizon

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.67

2021-10-01
Milwaukee
Wright St.
3
2
20
25
25
27
25
23
25
22
15
5
GAME

76.18

2021-11-20 Milwaukee, WI
Northern Ky.
Wright St.
3
2
27
25
18
25
25
22
21
25
15
11
GAME

75.89

2021-10-28
Wright St.
UIC
2
3
22
25
25
20
21
25
25
20
16
18
GAME

73.24

2021-09-25
Wright St.
Northern Ky.
2
3
18
25
26
28
25
22
25
18
12
15
GAME

72.51

2021-10-22
Northern Ky.
Wright St.
2
3
20
25
25
23
25
23
18
25
12
15
GAME

71.05

2021-10-25
Green Bay
Milwaukee
1
3
32
30
22
25
19
25
21
25
GAME

69.70

2021-10-29
Wright St.
Milwaukee
3
1
19
25
25
21
25
20
25
18
GAME

69.22

2021-09-26
Purdue Fort Wayne
UIC
2
3
25
19
22
25
23
25
25
18
12
15
GAME

68.24

2021-11-05
Purdue Fort Wayne
Wright St.
0
3
27
29
18
25
19
25
GAME

67.96

2021-10-28
Northern Ky.
Milwaukee
3
0
25
16
26
24
25
22

HuskerGeek Horizon All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.0102
2 25.3779
3 25.3166
4 23.8639
5 22.5619
6 21.9021
7 21.6090
8 21.5425
9 21.5071
10 20.2187

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.4024
2 14.8621
3 14.1785
4 13.6689
5 12.8891
6 12.6849
7 12.5401
8 12.3184
9 12.1668
10 11.9490

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.9535
2 16.2092
3 15.8524
4 13.7861
5 13.7754
6 13.6143
7 13.2111
8 12.8011
9 12.6078
10 11.6477

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2637
2 0.2363
3 0.2127
4 0.2097
5 0.2033
6 0.1973
7 0.1958
8 0.1947
9 0.1935
10 0.1912

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1491
2 0.1339
3 0.1242
4 0.1222
5 0.1208
6 0.1161
7 0.1149
8 0.1143
9 0.1135
10 0.1034

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1922
2 0.1605
3 0.1365
4 0.1310
5 0.1241
6 0.1216
7 0.1173
8 0.1164
9 0.1146
10 0.1121


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek