Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Horizon - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wright St. 1,531.3585 1,535.2960 1,533.3260 52.58 56.59 0.064
2nd Green Bay 1,488.7716 1,497.9699 1,493.3637 52.52 54.03 0.058
3rd Northern Ky. 1,477.1119 1,478.4797 1,477.7957 51.57 51.96 0.047
4th Cleveland St. 1,429.0687 1,428.8320 1,428.9503 49.69 48.56 -0.017
5th Milwaukee 1,408.8684 1,417.9695 1,413.4116 47.34 50.95 -0.015
6th Oakland 1,372.0305 1,379.1655 1,375.5933 48.73 45.97 -0.074
7th Youngstown St. 1,367.1625 1,376.9572 1,372.0511 45.61 49.04 -0.038
8th Purdue Fort Wayne 1,342.0039 1,349.3632 1,345.6785 44.15 46.40 -0.088
9th IUPUI 1,312.3600 1,322.6295 1,317.4848 44.60 46.12 -0.108
10th Robert Morris 1,294.4813 1,304.1537 1,299.3085 45.32 44.44 -0.149

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Green Bay 0.2454 37.72 13.18 35.36 48.59 5.80 6.64
2nd Milwaukee 0.2309 37.81 14.72 34.88 46.73 6.99 4.72
3rd Wright St. 0.2274 36.67 13.93 34.38 49.14 5.27 7.07
4th Northern Ky. 0.2139 36.44 15.05 33.57 50.28 5.92 7.16
5th Youngstown St. 0.2047 36.13 15.66 34.21 49.31 6.67 7.49
6th Cleveland St. 0.1727 31.39 14.12 28.11 55.95 4.70 6.47
7th Purdue Fort Wayne 0.1596 34.32 18.35 31.76 49.30 6.15 5.39
8th Oakland 0.1563 30.93 15.31 28.93 54.14 5.56 5.88
9th IUPUI 0.1433 32.01 17.68 29.49 52.71 6.04 7.84
10th Robert Morris 0.1392 31.58 17.66 29.28 52.56 7.19 7.13

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wright St. 0.1637 32.24 15.87 30.16 54.43 6.12 3.73
2nd Northern Ky. 0.1670 33.16 16.47 30.23 51.35 7.62 5.47
3rd Green Bay 0.1879 35.01 16.23 32.59 49.72 6.47 6.15
4th Cleveland St. 0.1895 34.89 15.94 32.32 49.38 6.52 6.30
5th Oakland 0.2298 36.56 13.58 33.68 50.83 3.95 6.79
6th Youngstown St. 0.2423 38.42 14.19 35.37 47.77 5.03 8.10
7th Milwaukee 0.2462 39.51 14.89 36.76 45.63 6.07 7.38
8th Purdue Fort Wayne 0.2481 38.33 13.52 35.47 48.81 4.93 7.59
9th IUPUI 0.2517 38.56 13.38 35.70 46.78 4.96 8.26
10th Robert Morris 0.2884 41.61 12.77 38.38 46.24 3.59 8.56

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,405.6964 1,403.0411 1,402.2468 1,397.5016 1,402.1215
Difference -2.6552 -3.4496 -8.1948 -4.7665

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wright St. 119 2,737 1,460 196 223 53.34 14.0 12.3 2,353 1,040 87 248 55.80 27.0 9.5
Green Bay 119 2,737 1,475 180 187 53.89 15.2 14.6 2,427 1,126 152 204 53.61 16.0 11.9
Northern Ky. 115 2,536 1,294 176 252 51.03 14.4 10.1 2,489 1,224 138 197 50.82 18.0 12.6
Cleveland St. 120 2,564 1,323 171 218 51.60 15.0 11.8 2,524 1,279 153 239 49.33 16.5 10.6
Oakland 112 2,401 1,219 143 160 50.77 16.8 15.0 2,493 1,322 168 248 46.97 14.8 10.1
Youngstown St. 118 2,466 1,188 191 279 48.18 12.9 8.8 2,570 1,302 204 177 49.34 12.6 14.5
Milwaukee 106 2,256 1,062 100 150 47.07 22.6 15.0 2,409 1,211 185 216 49.73 13.0 11.2
Purdue Fort Wayne 106 2,245 1,055 126 196 46.99 17.8 11.5 2,411 1,274 182 190 47.16 13.2 12.7
IUPUI 114 2,365 1,113 191 260 47.06 12.4 9.1 2,617 1,385 207 214 47.08 12.6 12.2
Robert Morris 112 2,239 1,085 171 192 48.46 13.1 11.7 2,546 1,385 211 239 45.60 12.1 10.7
Conference Average 114 2,455 1,227 165 212 49.84 15.4 12.0 2,484 1,255 169 217 49.54 15.6 11.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Horizon

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.19

2022-10-28
Green Bay
Wright St.
2
3
25
27
27
25
25
20
11
25
10
15
GAME

72.27

2022-11-01
Wright St.
Northern Ky.
3
2
25
23
17
25
18
25
25
21
15
9
GAME

71.01

2022-10-18
Oakland
Youngstown St.
2
3
25
23
25
21
29
31
19
25
12
15
GAME

70.69

2022-10-29
Green Bay
Northern Ky.
1
3
22
25
22
25
25
22
27
29
GAME

70.15

2022-10-01
Wright St.
Green Bay
3
0
25
20
28
26
25
22
GAME

70.11

2022-10-15
Northern Ky.
Youngstown St.
3
2
21
25
25
15
32
30
23
25
15
10
GAME

70.01

2022-10-29
IUPUI
Youngstown St.
2
3
35
33
23
25
25
18
20
25
9
15
GAME

69.94

2022-10-07
Green Bay
Oakland
2
3
19
25
25
22
22
25
25
13
14
16
GAME

69.53

2022-09-20
Youngstown St.
Cleveland St.
2
3
25
14
15
25
20
25
25
15
16
18
GAME

69.32

2022-10-22
Wright St.
Cleveland St.
3
2
21
25
25
13
23
25
25
18
16
14

HuskerGeek Horizon All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 31.7148
2 26.6301
3 25.6295
4 25.2160
5 23.6427
6 23.5225
7 22.1075
8 21.0378
9 20.8878
10 19.9195

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 21.8540
2 16.3577
3 13.9862
4 13.9374
5 13.4257
6 13.1687
7 11.9793
8 11.9277
9 11.4765
10 10.8049

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.2693
2 18.6434
3 16.9881
4 16.0934
5 14.6872
6 14.4606
7 14.4110
8 13.8586
9 12.9808
10 12.6806

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2883
2 0.2446
3 0.2238
4 0.2232
5 0.2154
6 0.2111
7 0.2063
8 0.1858
9 0.1816
10 0.1802

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1987
2 0.1531
3 0.1375
4 0.1340
5 0.1244
6 0.1178
7 0.1175
8 0.1174
9 0.1083
10 0.0969

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1703
2 0.1665
3 0.1518
4 0.1477
5 0.1476
6 0.1275
7 0.1255
8 0.1237
9 0.1129
10 0.1063


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek