Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Landmark - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Susquehanna 1,558.6548 1,518.9815 1,538.6903 58.41 65.11 0.243
2nd Juniata 1,554.1881 1,516.4593 1,535.2078 58.11 64.62 0.239
3rd Scranton 1,396.2804 1,362.3839 1,379.2280 54.62 53.05 0.101
4th Catholic 1,383.0428 1,350.0406 1,366.4421 51.17 56.50 0.064
5th Elizabethtown 1,352.7974 1,315.7453 1,334.1427 52.22 53.25 0.035
6th Goucher 1,288.7751 1,252.6255 1,270.5718 49.89 49.04 -0.041
7th Moravian 1,261.0976 1,219.6880 1,240.2200 47.27 46.36 -0.064

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Susquehanna 0.3072 43.18 12.46 39.70 43.03 2.64 10.50
2nd Juniata 0.2912 42.20 13.08 38.78 44.68 3.29 10.75
3rd Scranton 0.2190 36.22 14.32 33.63 49.96 3.99 11.13
4th Catholic 0.1990 33.10 13.20 30.82 53.38 3.79 7.46
5th Elizabethtown 0.1836 30.59 12.23 28.10 54.63 3.17 9.61
6th Goucher 0.1264 28.30 15.66 26.78 59.37 3.94 9.19
7th Moravian 0.1124 28.92 17.67 26.21 55.22 4.90 11.16

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Juniata 0.0525 24.43 19.18 22.33 60.89 8.01 5.76
2nd Susquehanna 0.0643 24.51 18.07 22.85 59.01 5.99 5.10
3rd Scranton 0.1180 28.10 16.30 25.73 57.77 5.18 9.43
4th Catholic 0.1350 29.77 16.27 27.79 56.94 3.66 8.11
5th Elizabethtown 0.1485 28.94 14.08 27.21 58.24 2.66 7.91
6th Goucher 0.1673 31.32 14.59 28.90 55.44 2.26 8.90
7th Moravian 0.1760 32.07 14.46 29.76 54.67 3.67 10.09

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,380.6432 1,377.1185 1,359.9376 1,366.4421 1,371.0353
Difference -3.5248 -20.7056 -14.2011 -12.8105

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Susquehanna 127 2,760 1,472 256 292 53.33 10.8 9.5 2,247 936 142 210 58.34 15.8 10.7
Juniata 112 2,470 1,327 226 247 53.73 10.9 10.0 2,043 877 141 194 57.07 14.5 10.5
Elizabethtown 119 2,424 1,295 263 240 53.42 9.2 10.1 2,260 1,112 204 259 50.80 11.1 8.7
Catholic 115 2,316 1,161 156 174 50.13 14.8 13.3 2,226 1,043 222 267 53.15 10.0 8.3
Goucher 87 1,517 820 182 222 54.05 8.3 6.8 1,465 776 177 212 47.03 8.3 6.9
Scranton 125 2,450 1,280 256 335 52.25 9.6 7.3 2,392 1,245 279 221 47.95 8.6 10.8
Moravian 113 1,777 855 251 266 48.12 7.1 6.7 2,034 1,136 236 230 44.15 8.6 8.8
Conference Average 114 2,245 1,173 227 254 52.15 10.1 9.1 2,095 1,018 200 228 51.21 11.0 9.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Landmark

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.76

2019-11-02 Huntingdon, PA
Juniata
Susquehanna
2
3
25
17
26
24
18
25
21
25
10
15
GAME

68.63

2019-10-05 Scranton, PA
Catholic
Juniata
0
3
22
25
21
25
23
25
GAME

68.09

2019-11-09 Selinsgrove, PA
Susquehanna
Juniata
0
3
16
25
19
25
24
26
GAME

67.90

2019-10-05
Scranton
Juniata
1
3
16
25
33
31
11
25
24
26
GAME

64.43

2019-10-05
Scranton
Catholic
3
1
19
25
25
22
25
18
25
23
GAME

63.15

2019-10-05
Elizabethtown
Susquehanna
0
3
16
25
12
25
22
25
GAME

62.76

2019-11-02 Towson, MD
Elizabethtown
Scranton
3
0
25
19
26
24
26
24
GAME

62.51

2019-10-16
Scranton
Susquehanna
0
3
17
25
17
25
19
25
GAME

62.42

2019-11-02 Huntingdon, Pa.
Susquehanna
Catholic
3
0
25
19
25
18
25
14
GAME

62.07

2019-11-06 Huntingdon, Pa.
Juniata
Elizabethtown
3
0
25
15
25
17
25
14

HuskerGeek Landmark All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.8599
2 19.9565
3 19.7745
4 19.6382
5 18.7802
6 18.5718
7 17.5613
8 17.2872
9 15.9095
10 15.7287

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.2260
2 12.8630
3 11.9614
4 11.3940
5 10.8198
6 10.3467
7 10.2088
8 9.6413
9 8.2578
10 7.7810

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.4901
2 15.5179
3 14.7376
4 11.1586
5 10.7908
6 10.3151
7 10.1828
8 10.0549
9 9.8408
10 9.6171

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2169
2 0.1920
3 0.1901
4 0.1897
5 0.1849
6 0.1818
7 0.1803
8 0.1739
9 0.1607
10 0.1601

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1384
2 0.1159
3 0.1151
4 0.1139
5 0.1108
6 0.1005
7 0.0991
8 0.0918
9 0.0836
10 0.0802

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1567
2 0.1527
3 0.1479
4 0.1431
5 0.1316
6 0.1151
7 0.1095
8 0.1048
9 0.1029
10 0.0990


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek