Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,694.2539

Football georgia 11.9216
Men's Basketball arizona 10.5146
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.2365
Ice Hockey minnesota st 8.1338
Men's Soccer washington 9.3221
Women's Soccer florida st 10.8390
Men's Volleyball hawaii 9.0598
Women's Volleyball louisville 11.6893
Field Hockey iowa 10.0663

Landmark - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Juniata 1,650.3302 1,644.6961 1,647.5107 64.84 61.07 0.305
2nd Susquehanna 1,519.2827 1,516.0913 1,517.6861 57.50 54.51 0.191
3rd Scranton 1,478.0496 1,471.9736 1,475.0085 61.10 49.78 0.134
4th Elizabethtown 1,457.9951 1,454.2517 1,456.1222 61.51 49.14 0.108
5th Drew 1,364.7513 1,362.9242 1,363.8374 53.87 49.52 0.039
6th Catholic 1,351.7553 1,344.3394 1,348.0422 49.31 49.21 0.000
7th Moravian 1,312.0625 1,305.4195 1,308.7368 51.78 43.97 -0.024
8th Goucher 1,203.8850 1,202.2056 1,203.0450 50.69 39.11 -0.145

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Juniata 0.3183 43.14 11.31 39.42 42.91 2.82 11.19
2nd Susquehanna 0.2475 36.38 11.63 32.42 50.49 2.96 8.51
3rd Scranton 0.2221 37.29 15.08 33.68 46.00 4.04 13.08
4th Elizabethtown 0.1993 32.59 12.67 29.75 55.81 3.20 10.94
5th Drew 0.1811 31.66 13.55 27.86 56.41 3.07 9.73
6th Catholic 0.1543 32.03 16.60 29.63 53.94 4.69 8.25
7th Moravian 0.1354 28.58 15.04 25.86 60.35 4.53 8.65
8th Goucher 0.0671 24.71 18.00 22.28 57.67 4.59 8.16

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Juniata 0.0135 19.21 17.86 17.79 67.74 4.95 5.07
2nd Susquehanna 0.0562 24.59 18.97 23.37 60.81 7.10 5.47
3rd Scranton 0.0884 26.54 17.70 24.62 54.94 4.60 8.16
4th Elizabethtown 0.0909 26.01 16.92 25.02 62.67 4.17 5.40
5th Drew 0.1426 28.59 14.33 26.17 58.43 2.92 6.66
6th Catholic 0.1547 31.56 16.09 29.62 52.06 3.92 8.14
7th Moravian 0.1594 31.39 15.46 29.53 55.54 3.81 9.76
8th Goucher 0.2119 33.89 12.70 30.45 52.83 2.07 10.23

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,414.9986 1,411.5722 1,410.7526 1,409.9798 1,411.8258
Difference -3.4264 -4.2460 -5.0188 -4.2304

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Juniata 116 1,586 934 249 224 58.89 6.4 7.1 1,167 514 135 187 55.96 8.6 6.2
Elizabethtown 100 1,860 1,139 241 204 61.24 7.7 9.1 1,557 825 138 180 47.01 11.3 8.7
Scranton 120 2,156 1,269 316 226 58.86 6.8 9.5 1,926 1,022 247 225 46.94 7.8 8.6
Drew 104 2,092 1,170 236 237 55.93 8.9 8.8 1,915 981 159 190 48.77 12.0 10.1
Susquehanna 113 1,391 727 208 211 52.27 6.7 6.6 1,230 601 170 194 51.14 7.2 6.3
Moravian 101 1,465 770 200 193 52.56 7.3 7.6 1,598 905 217 184 43.37 7.4 8.7
Catholic 114 1,333 639 150 185 47.94 8.9 7.2 1,454 776 243 300 46.63 6.0 4.8
Goucher 86 1,287 683 154 146 53.07 8.4 8.8 1,550 938 209 195 39.48 7.4 7.9
Conference Average 107 1,646 916 219 203 55.09 7.6 8.1 1,550 820 190 207 47.41 8.5 7.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Landmark

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

69.56

2021-10-02 Huntingdon, Pa.
Susquehanna
Drew
3
2
25
22
25
14
25
27
22
25
17
15
GAME

68.20

2021-10-20
Moravian
Drew
2
3
25
21
18
25
21
25
25
23
12
15
GAME

68.15

2021-10-06
Elizabethtown
Moravian
3
2
28
26
21
25
25
15
23
25
15
7
GAME

67.16

2021-10-30
Elizabethtown
Juniata
0
3
18
25
18
25
14
25
GAME

67.00

2021-10-27
Susquehanna
Catholic
3
0
25
22
25
21
25
19
GAME

66.15

2021-10-20
Scranton
Elizabethtown
1
3
18
25
25
23
21
25
21
25
GAME

65.92

2021-10-30 Elizabethtown, PA
Juniata
Scranton
3
0
25
20
25
18
25
16
GAME

64.94

2021-10-30 Madison, N.J.
Goucher
Moravian
3
2
25
20
25
22
22
25
18
25
15
7
GAME

64.11

2021-10-30
Drew
Catholic
2
3
22
25
25
17
22
25
27
25
8
15
GAME

63.92

2021-10-02 Huntingdon, Pa.
Juniata
Drew
4
0
25
11
25
21
25
6
0
0

HuskerGeek Landmark All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 19.0477
2 16.5071
3 15.3224
4 13.7077
5 13.6073
6 12.8924
7 12.5424
8 12.3211
9 12.1501
10 12.0830

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.6093
2 9.8288
3 8.2306
4 7.6374
5 7.0157
6 6.0933
7 6.0328
8 5.7561
9 5.6714
10 5.5281

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.9123
2 11.5079
3 11.3470
4 10.1752
5 10.1430
6 9.9465
7 9.2188
8 8.8471
9 8.1097
10 7.6636

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2394
2 0.2215
3 0.2016
4 0.1989
5 0.1924
6 0.1917
7 0.1763
8 0.1735
9 0.1722
10 0.1722

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1286
2 0.1278
3 0.1150
4 0.1143
5 0.1123
6 0.0958
7 0.0874
8 0.0859
9 0.0838
10 0.0834

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1833
2 0.1475
3 0.1470
4 0.1463
5 0.1438
6 0.1436
7 0.1142
8 0.1120
9 0.1108
10 0.1072


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek