Nerdly Nebraska.

2022-2023 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Texas 1,730.6611

Football georgia 11.6118
Men's Basketball houston 9.4563
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.7610
Softball columbia 5.0000
Ice Hockey minnesota 8.5914
Men's Lacrosse marquette 7.9259
Men's Soccer kentucky 8.7687
Women's Soccer ucla 11.0741
Men's Volleyball long beach st 9.3011
Women's Volleyball texas 12.4762
Field Hockey north carolina 10.0384

Landmark - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Juniata 1,659.6208 1,655.5314 1,657.5748 66.12 63.85 0.357
2nd Scranton 1,479.6167 1,474.0693 1,476.8404 62.93 49.76 0.172
3rd Susquehanna 1,451.1734 1,449.1040 1,450.1384 59.06 51.26 0.164
4th Elizabethtown 1,424.2771 1,421.6196 1,422.9477 57.72 52.14 0.097
5th Drew 1,395.1742 1,388.7573 1,391.9620 58.72 46.87 0.090
6th Catholic 1,369.3072 1,369.1120 1,369.2096 55.59 48.15 0.055
7th Moravian 1,230.8089 1,231.2635 1,231.0362 52.69 42.43 -0.070
8th Goucher 1,143.4330 1,146.5650 1,144.9980 49.32 36.26 -0.169

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Juniata 0.3450 46.01 11.51 42.29 39.64 3.19 14.46
2nd Susquehanna 0.2594 38.52 12.58 34.74 46.18 4.02 9.45
3rd Scranton 0.2532 38.56 13.24 34.60 48.10 2.89 10.98
4th Elizabethtown 0.2163 34.45 12.81 30.63 51.56 4.05 9.68
5th Catholic 0.2038 36.95 16.58 33.72 48.23 4.51 10.42
6th Drew 0.1872 32.66 13.93 29.20 56.03 2.66 12.81
7th Moravian 0.1269 26.75 14.06 24.66 61.57 3.57 9.93
8th Goucher 0.0522 24.53 19.31 23.16 60.96 4.71 8.90

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Juniata -0.0123 17.40 18.63 15.64 68.45 5.97 6.36
2nd Scranton 0.0815 24.20 16.06 21.52 62.43 4.26 8.68
3rd Susquehanna 0.0956 26.64 17.08 24.63 57.81 5.65 6.54
4th Drew 0.0970 25.02 15.32 23.17 61.67 4.48 6.97
5th Elizabethtown 0.1189 28.95 17.06 26.47 55.40 5.09 6.20
6th Catholic 0.1492 32.09 17.17 29.59 51.71 4.74 8.98
7th Moravian 0.1969 33.95 14.26 31.16 55.20 2.31 11.88
8th Goucher 0.2207 35.56 13.49 31.65 52.18 2.90 11.99

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,393.0884 1,390.3557 1,408.5644 1,407.4549 1,399.8658
Difference -2.7327 15.4761 14.3665 9.0366

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Juniata 118 2,477 1,479 343 273 59.71 7.2 9.1 1,743 734 142 151 57.89 12.3 11.5
Elizabethtown 106 2,251 1,297 243 182 57.62 9.3 12.4 1,946 967 155 198 50.31 12.6 9.8
Drew 104 1,964 1,169 298 285 59.52 6.6 6.9 1,728 956 159 199 44.68 10.9 8.7
Scranton 131 2,899 1,679 272 274 57.92 10.7 10.6 2,744 1,512 278 248 44.90 9.9 11.1
Catholic 108 2,030 1,124 228 203 55.37 8.9 10.0 1,972 1,060 234 236 46.25 8.4 8.4
Susquehanna 113 2,221 1,206 185 251 54.30 12.0 8.8 2,213 1,205 199 185 45.55 11.1 12.0
Moravian 105 2,062 1,160 233 190 56.26 8.8 10.9 2,215 1,278 278 201 42.30 8.0 11.0
Goucher 86 1,533 796 165 169 51.92 9.3 9.1 2,005 1,302 251 192 35.06 8.0 10.4
Conference Average 109 2,180 1,239 246 228 56.58 9.1 9.7 2,071 1,127 212 201 45.87 10.1 10.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Landmark

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.76

2022-10-29
Susquehanna
Elizabethtown
2
3
25
27
25
18
25
22
17
25
11
15
GAME

70.66

2022-11-05 Huntingdon, Pa.
Juniata
Scranton
3
1
25
9
25
23
21
25
25
21
GAME

69.41

2022-10-29 Bethlehem, PA
Juniata
Scranton
3
1
25
19
25
18
23
25
25
17
GAME

68.62

2022-11-02 Huntingdon, Pa.
Juniata
Susquehanna
3
1
22
25
25
9
25
13
25
16
GAME

66.46

2022-10-12
Elizabethtown
Juniata
1
3
10
25
25
18
17
25
11
25
GAME

65.72

2022-10-01 Washington, DC
Juniata
Susquehanna
3
0
25
20
25
10
25
7
GAME

64.66

2022-11-02
Scranton
Elizabethtown
3
0
25
23
25
20
25
19
GAME

64.50

2022-10-01 Washington, DC
Juniata
Drew
3
0
25
13
25
19
25
11
GAME

64.13

2022-10-01 Towson, MD
Scranton
Elizabethtown
3
0
25
16
25
19
25
18
GAME

64.11

2022-10-05 Huntingdon, Pa.
Juniata
Catholic
3
0
25
12
25
17
25
21

HuskerGeek Landmark All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 21.3205
2 18.4341
3 18.0502
4 17.9905
5 16.5829
6 16.5791
7 16.3113
8 15.7700
9 15.6379
10 15.4153

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.4365
2 10.1954
3 9.4661
4 9.4054
5 8.2178
6 8.1590
7 8.1104
8 7.4845
9 7.4488
10 7.4395

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.9137
2 15.6959
3 14.6211
4 13.5519
5 12.9232
6 11.7672
7 11.6633
8 9.0007
9 8.4238
10 8.3342

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1982
2 0.1919
3 0.1907
4 0.1875
5 0.1822
6 0.1692
7 0.1665
8 0.1658
9 0.1611
10 0.1583

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1198
2 0.1148
3 0.1096
4 0.0966
5 0.0922
6 0.0893
7 0.0891
8 0.0891
9 0.0816
10 0.0766

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1804
2 0.1492
3 0.1445
4 0.1405
5 0.1375
6 0.1329
7 0.1032
8 0.1016
9 0.0947
10 0.0886


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek