Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Landmark - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Juniata 1,663.6550 1,661.6587 1,662.6565 65.60 65.81 0.352
2nd Scranton 1,455.8890 1,452.0831 1,453.9848 59.96 49.44 0.135
3rd Catholic 1,391.1567 1,392.8377 1,391.9969 55.01 53.43 0.065
4th Elizabethtown 1,387.3912 1,385.3769 1,386.3837 58.96 46.64 0.055
5th Susquehanna 1,355.1993 1,355.1801 1,355.1897 54.93 48.77 0.054
6th Drew 1,286.0667 1,282.5618 1,284.3131 55.30 42.90 -0.036
7th Lycoming 1,258.3528 1,257.4723 1,257.9125 53.14 43.24 -0.063
8th Moravian 1,226.3224 1,224.3252 1,225.3234 54.18 40.41 -0.070
9th Wilkes 1,205.0364 1,201.0135 1,203.0233 53.69 38.56 -0.113
10th Goucher 1,125.9422 1,126.1183 1,126.0302 48.83 36.72 -0.196

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Juniata 0.3557 47.02 11.45 43.63 39.68 3.06 16.30
2nd Scranton 0.2419 37.69 13.50 34.61 47.40 3.55 11.56
3rd Catholic 0.2285 35.74 12.90 33.30 50.08 5.03 8.99
4th Susquehanna 0.2119 35.84 14.66 31.79 50.04 4.37 10.15
5th Elizabethtown 0.1790 31.12 13.22 27.70 55.64 3.64 9.79
6th Drew 0.1265 27.62 14.98 25.85 59.85 3.41 10.03
7th Lycoming 0.1166 27.79 16.13 25.10 55.76 4.81 8.14
8th Moravian 0.1147 26.74 15.27 24.28 60.00 3.88 7.84
9th Wilkes 0.0967 28.32 18.65 25.99 56.30 4.98 11.79
10th Goucher 0.0486 23.06 18.20 20.62 61.01 4.62 9.22

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Juniata 0.0039 18.94 18.56 17.64 68.09 5.55 5.34
2nd Scranton 0.1074 27.87 17.13 25.48 58.81 4.51 7.09
3rd Elizabethtown 0.1240 29.54 17.14 27.13 57.03 4.58 7.60
4th Susquehanna 0.1580 31.74 15.94 28.90 54.60 4.61 8.53
5th Drew 0.1626 29.56 13.30 27.58 58.79 2.30 8.52
6th Catholic 0.1633 32.38 16.04 30.14 53.92 4.36 7.83
7th Lycoming 0.1800 33.10 15.09 30.17 50.57 3.36 10.45
8th Moravian 0.1851 34.28 15.77 31.17 51.89 3.66 10.31
9th Wilkes 0.2098 36.90 15.93 33.17 48.63 3.86 13.70
10th Goucher 0.2446 37.57 13.11 33.22 48.69 2.47 12.53

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,334.6814 1,319.7659 1,316.8532 1,320.9497 1,323.0626
Difference -14.9155 -17.8282 -13.7317 -15.4918

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Juniata 112 2,726 1,646 394 291 60.38 6.9 9.4 1,815 713 117 160 60.72 15.5 11.3
Catholic 118 2,577 1,427 228 203 55.37 11.3 12.7 2,335 1,137 213 254 51.31 11.0 9.2
Lycoming 80 1,713 1,002 161 116 58.49 10.6 14.8 1,642 928 176 155 43.48 9.3 10.6
Elizabethtown 98 2,067 1,186 192 141 57.38 10.8 14.7 2,018 1,125 182 182 44.25 11.1 11.1
Scranton 107 2,294 1,285 244 249 56.02 9.4 9.2 2,222 1,219 194 183 45.14 11.5 12.1
Moravian 95 1,649 950 173 169 57.61 9.5 9.8 1,719 1,001 209 196 41.77 8.2 8.8
Wilkes 110 2,180 1,244 272 261 57.06 8.0 8.4 2,405 1,450 328 224 39.71 7.3 10.7
Drew 97 1,930 1,060 195 249 54.92 9.9 7.8 2,126 1,240 203 206 41.68 10.5 10.3
Susquehanna 105 2,084 1,075 190 230 51.58 11.0 9.1 2,296 1,270 233 204 44.69 9.9 11.3
Goucher 80 1,388 729 157 124 52.52 8.8 11.2 1,769 1,119 238 167 36.74 7.4 10.6
Conference Average 100 2,061 1,160 221 203 56.13 9.6 10.7 2,035 1,120 209 193 44.95 10.2 10.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

HuskerGeek Landmark All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.5358
2 19.5132
3 18.7936
4 18.7201
5 18.0608
6 17.2277
7 17.1497
8 15.9612
9 15.1623
10 14.5961

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.4170
2 11.4094
3 11.2167
4 11.0115
5 8.8310
6 8.7325
7 8.6540
8 8.5424
9 8.1115
10 7.8926

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.4102
2 16.6124
3 16.3208
4 15.6343
5 13.7031
6 11.6649
7 11.1188
8 10.8498
9 9.4611
10 9.3296

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2526
2 0.2470
3 0.1950
4 0.1936
5 0.1901
6 0.1890
7 0.1724
8 0.1717
9 0.1716
10 0.1595

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1506
2 0.1147
3 0.1122
4 0.1047
5 0.1018
6 0.0960
7 0.0955
8 0.0949
9 0.0887
10 0.0873

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2103
2 0.1852
3 0.1718
4 0.1681
5 0.1597
6 0.1228
7 0.1096
8 0.1063
9 0.1020
10 0.0986


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek