Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Liberty League - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Clarkson 1,534.4570 1,500.9126 1,517.5921 61.23 65.16 0.199
2nd Ithaca 1,526.9065 1,487.3979 1,507.0227 57.44 63.00 0.241
3rd RIT 1,444.1829 1,400.6254 1,422.2374 50.26 59.19 0.142
4th Skidmore 1,365.1985 1,324.4808 1,344.6855 51.14 55.05 0.053
5th St. Lawrence 1,359.9841 1,322.9170 1,341.3225 54.99 48.66 0.076
6th Union (NY) 1,343.6709 1,312.0979 1,327.7906 50.23 53.43 0.057
7th Vassar 1,317.3139 1,275.5745 1,296.2762 47.57 53.71 0.019
8th Bard 1,116.0047 1,078.9278 1,097.3097 45.03 39.70 -0.191

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Ithaca 0.2892 43.02 14.10 39.67 42.29 4.34 8.92
2nd Clarkson 0.2733 38.56 11.24 35.98 48.55 2.81 11.60
3rd RIT 0.2637 40.35 13.97 37.86 40.53 3.08 9.40
4th Union (NY) 0.2293 35.81 12.88 32.63 51.76 3.36 9.95
5th Skidmore 0.1935 33.80 14.45 31.99 51.64 4.48 8.62
6th Vassar 0.1865 31.71 13.07 29.74 56.28 3.18 8.56
7th St. Lawrence 0.1777 32.00 14.24 30.45 54.06 3.76 8.96
8th Bard 0.0277 20.93 18.16 19.50 66.59 4.15 9.03

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Ithaca 0.0481 22.80 17.99 20.74 63.06 5.80 7.74
2nd Clarkson 0.0743 24.63 17.20 23.03 62.34 4.16 4.26
3rd St. Lawrence 0.1018 26.95 16.77 24.68 61.17 5.55 6.83
4th RIT 0.1213 28.68 16.54 25.99 55.92 4.24 8.28
5th Skidmore 0.1410 30.83 16.73 28.83 55.14 5.07 9.34
6th Vassar 0.1671 31.95 15.23 29.59 55.40 3.26 9.99
7th Union (NY) 0.1727 31.31 14.05 29.06 57.12 3.19 7.25
8th Bard 0.2183 35.92 14.09 32.27 52.67 1.46 10.98

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,356.7796 1,373.2225 1,359.0090 1,343.0040 1,358.0038
Difference 16.4429 2.2294 -13.7756 1.6322

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Clarkson 106 2,478 1,492 252 187 60.21 9.8 13.3 1,787 741 87 201 58.53 20.5 8.9
Ithaca 101 2,219 1,100 157 232 49.57 14.1 9.6 2,028 904 181 171 55.42 11.2 11.9
Skidmore 88 1,881 966 162 111 51.36 11.6 16.9 1,806 868 159 146 51.94 11.4 12.4
RIT 111 2,101 1,005 218 223 47.83 9.6 9.4 2,037 939 182 196 53.90 11.2 10.4
St. Lawrence 117 2,216 1,232 223 282 55.60 9.9 7.9 2,122 1,159 174 192 45.38 12.2 11.1
Union (NY) 100 1,892 969 213 225 51.22 8.9 8.4 1,846 928 154 191 49.73 12.0 9.7
Vassar 102 1,907 908 159 239 47.61 12.0 8.0 2,033 1,024 232 222 49.63 8.8 9.2
Bard 95 1,439 723 201 261 50.24 7.2 5.5 1,784 1,052 204 216 41.03 8.7 8.3
Conference Average 103 2,017 1,049 198 220 51.71 10.4 9.9 1,930 952 172 192 50.70 12.0 10.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Liberty League

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

68.58

2019-10-25 Potsdam, NY
Clarkson
Ithaca
3
1
25
21
24
26
25
16
25
21
GAME

66.14

2019-10-23 Rochester, N.Y.
RIT
Ithaca
0
3
20
25
18
25
27
29
GAME

66.05

2019-09-28 Rochester, N.Y.
RIT
Union (NY)
3
0
25
20
30
28
25
15
GAME

65.14

2019-10-02 Saratoga Springs, NY
Skidmore
Union (NY)
3
2
25
17
22
25
25
19
22
25
15
6
GAME

64.72

2019-10-26 Rochester, NY
RIT
Clarkson
3
2
17
25
25
23
25
18
14
25
15
11
GAME

64.58

2019-09-27 Rochester, N.Y.
RIT
Skidmore
1
3
25
20
22
25
21
25
25
27
GAME

63.77

2019-10-25
St. Lawrence
RIT
2
3
22
25
25
12
21
25
27
25
12
15
GAME

63.66

2019-11-08 Potsdam, NY
Ithaca
RIT
3
0
25
18
25
20
25
22
GAME

63.57

2019-10-26 Saratoga Springs, NY
Skidmore
Vassar
3
0
26
24
25
20
25
23
GAME

63.41

2019-09-28
St. Lawrence
Vassar
3
2
22
25
20
25
25
19
26
24
15
13

HuskerGeek Liberty League All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 20.8224
2 20.3914
3 18.8383
4 18.6955
5 18.4584
6 18.3488
7 15.8318
8 15.2857
9 14.5640
10 14.2709

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.2343
2 12.4349
3 12.3259
4 10.3031
5 9.0307
6 8.3247
7 7.7085
8 7.1777
9 7.1418
10 7.0439

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.8073
2 14.5957
3 12.7193
4 11.6896
5 11.3606
6 11.3078
7 10.7469
8 10.4957
9 9.3383
10 9.1225

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2147
2 0.2101
3 0.2039
4 0.2005
5 0.2004
6 0.1952
7 0.1846
8 0.1777
9 0.1636
10 0.1615

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1364
2 0.1323
3 0.1311
4 0.1030
5 0.1028
6 0.0918
7 0.0903
8 0.0893
9 0.0890
10 0.0814

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1870
2 0.1681
3 0.1489
4 0.1379
5 0.1313
6 0.1279
7 0.1164
8 0.1136
9 0.1086
10 0.1073


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek