Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

MAAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Canisius 1,433.0406 1,416.7419 1,424.8679 39.87 54.76 -0.041
2nd Iona 1,431.0897 1,416.5988 1,423.8258 39.16 55.00 -0.050
3rd Rider 1,381.7902 1,363.7332 1,372.7320 37.94 50.42 -0.120
4th Marist 1,364.6083 1,334.8551 1,349.6497 35.91 50.96 -0.108
5th Fairfield 1,358.0110 1,340.7505 1,349.3532 37.71 50.13 -0.116
6th Quinnipiac 1,334.0187 1,311.1550 1,322.5375 34.05 49.16 -0.185
7th Niagara 1,297.2904 1,272.6811 1,284.9268 31.18 48.11 -0.197
8th Saint Peter's 1,290.5137 1,264.1395 1,277.2585 32.66 46.12 -0.196
9th Manhattan 1,248.6343 1,217.1498 1,232.7916 32.64 41.71 -0.232
10th Siena 1,233.8990 1,208.6917 1,221.2303 31.93 42.54 -0.244

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Canisius 0.2070 34.98 14.28 31.55 50.11 5.21 5.25
2nd Iona 0.1721 34.30 17.09 32.35 49.96 6.97 5.43
3rd Marist 0.1374 31.95 18.22 30.28 52.85 6.35 4.85
4th Niagara 0.1223 27.28 15.05 25.53 61.29 5.34 3.15
5th Quinnipiac 0.1210 30.77 18.67 28.74 51.76 7.64 4.57
6th Rider 0.1183 28.76 16.93 26.94 55.79 6.44 4.66
7th Fairfield 0.1137 30.65 19.28 29.29 54.56 6.50 3.73
8th Saint Peter's 0.0979 26.11 16.33 24.35 60.60 6.00 4.13
9th Siena 0.0848 26.87 18.38 24.63 58.23 7.39 4.73
10th Manhattan 0.0788 25.71 17.84 23.41 59.48 6.53 7.54

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Iona 0.2225 35.81 13.56 34.25 52.26 4.93 6.09
2nd Fairfield 0.2299 36.72 13.73 34.96 50.33 4.26 6.94
3rd Rider 0.2385 38.01 14.15 35.68 47.37 5.46 7.02
4th Marist 0.2455 39.42 14.87 36.90 46.45 5.16 8.66
5th Canisius 0.2476 37.77 13.01 35.58 47.94 4.03 7.05
6th Saint Peter's 0.2940 42.95 13.55 40.20 43.40 3.58 8.32
7th Quinnipiac 0.3056 43.27 12.71 40.52 42.71 4.32 6.55
8th Manhattan 0.3105 45.09 14.04 41.51 41.36 4.48 10.57
9th Niagara 0.3189 44.64 12.75 42.09 42.07 4.41 8.42
10th Siena 0.3287 45.18 12.30 42.15 41.72 3.10 9.32

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,325.9173 1,326.6344 1,326.0763 1,326.6168 1,326.3112
Difference 0.7171 0.1590 0.6995 0.5252

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Canisius 104 2,375 1,120 163 217 47.16 14.6 10.9 2,140 882 136 187 58.79 15.7 11.4
Iona 106 2,413 1,120 168 299 46.42 14.4 8.1 2,220 909 115 169 59.05 19.3 13.1
Rider 116 2,546 1,202 170 192 47.21 15.0 13.3 2,382 1,034 147 225 56.59 16.2 10.6
Fairfield 107 2,338 1,059 125 153 45.30 18.7 15.3 2,342 1,066 151 201 54.48 15.5 11.7
Marist 115 2,468 1,073 157 224 43.48 15.7 11.0 2,531 1,122 201 219 55.67 12.6 11.6
Quinnipiac 116 2,435 1,014 152 191 41.64 16.0 12.7 2,608 1,203 149 232 53.87 17.5 11.2
Saint Peter's 133 2,688 1,116 159 271 41.52 16.9 9.9 2,967 1,426 221 266 51.94 13.4 11.2
Niagara 105 2,136 847 103 134 39.65 20.7 15.9 2,396 1,116 184 229 53.42 13.0 10.5
Manhattan 112 2,113 861 195 283 40.75 10.8 7.5 2,595 1,377 248 267 46.94 10.5 9.7
Siena 114 2,104 825 130 220 39.21 16.2 9.6 2,655 1,408 225 234 46.97 11.8 11.3
Conference Average 113 2,362 1,024 152 218 43.23 15.9 11.4 2,484 1,154 178 223 53.77 14.6 11.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the MAAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.89

2018-10-01 New Rochelle, NY
Iona
Rider
3
2
25
27
25
23
22
25
25
23
15
13
GAME

67.06

2018-09-29 New Rochelle, NY
Iona
Canisius
3
1
26
24
25
21
20
25
25
23
GAME

66.52

2018-11-11 Fairfield, Conn.
Fairfield
Canisius
1
3
17
25
23
25
26
24
23
25
GAME

66.07

2018-11-04 Lawrenceville, NJ
Rider
Iona
3
2
25
12
22
25
25
13
23
25
18
16
GAME

65.62

2018-09-23 Fairfield, Conn.
Fairfield
Iona
3
1
26
24
25
22
23
25
25
22
GAME

65.51

2018-11-10 Fairfield, Conn.
Fairfield
Niagara
3
2
24
26
22
25
25
20
25
15
20
18
GAME

64.73

2018-11-15 Lake Buena Vista, FL
Niagara
Quinnipiac
2
3
22
25
25
17
22
25
25
23
13
15
GAME

64.57

2018-11-04 Hamden, Conn.
Quinnipiac
Siena
3
1
28
26
27
29
26
24
25
13
GAME

64.52

2018-11-16 Lake Buena Vista, FL
Canisius
Rider
3
1
25
13
25
19
24
26
25
21
GAME

64.11

2018-10-12 New Rochelle, NY
Iona
Fairfield
3
1
25
20
25
22
22
25
25
14

HuskerGeek MAAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.7062
2 22.5719
3 22.0024
4 20.6861
5 19.6601
6 18.8714
7 18.5325
8 18.4912
9 18.3511
10 17.2275

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.7074
2 12.8858
3 12.2603
4 12.2042
5 11.5441
6 10.9005
7 10.7704
8 10.2257
9 9.8278
10 9.3390

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.9806
2 17.5981
3 15.5923
4 15.5601
5 15.4030
6 14.1387
7 12.7227
8 12.1746
9 11.6804
10 11.0827

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2183
2 0.2076
3 0.1952
4 0.1946
5 0.1815
6 0.1787
7 0.1744
8 0.1625
9 0.1601
10 0.1598

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1414
2 0.1216
3 0.1141
4 0.1057
5 0.1028
6 0.1012
7 0.0995
8 0.0979
9 0.0927
10 0.0895

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1729
2 0.1517
3 0.1471
4 0.1440
5 0.1219
6 0.1197
7 0.1149
8 0.1143
9 0.1097
10 0.1081


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek