Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

MAAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Fairfield 1,397.8978 1,407.4738 1,402.6776 48.17 50.31 -0.017
2nd Marist 1,342.3959 1,350.2798 1,346.3321 45.94 45.14 -0.095
3rd Quinnipiac 1,327.1937 1,330.7878 1,328.9895 45.28 43.17 -0.136
4th Iona 1,308.8171 1,322.4159 1,315.5989 45.72 44.59 -0.122
5th Siena 1,308.1209 1,314.7559 1,311.4342 44.85 44.90 -0.126
6th Canisius 1,302.7944 1,309.4205 1,306.1032 47.61 43.08 -0.140
7th Rider 1,297.2638 1,304.4664 1,300.8601 44.41 43.21 -0.152
8th Niagara 1,277.7819 1,284.8523 1,281.3122 44.05 43.31 -0.159
9th Saint Peter's 1,118.1973 1,122.3591 1,120.2762 39.46 34.59 -0.323
10th Manhattan 1,091.8342 1,096.5402 1,094.1847 39.54 32.85 -0.371

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Fairfield 0.1984 34.80 14.96 32.43 51.14 5.41 4.71
2nd Marist 0.1630 35.07 18.77 33.28 46.78 8.68 4.93
3rd Quinnipiac 0.1403 32.37 18.34 29.72 50.72 7.02 6.45
4th Siena 0.1310 29.90 16.80 27.82 54.68 6.23 6.59
5th Canisius 0.1274 29.64 16.90 27.64 54.31 6.64 6.70
6th Rider 0.1251 31.15 18.65 29.15 52.48 7.39 6.09
7th Iona 0.1226 28.47 16.21 26.94 56.96 6.77 5.75
8th Niagara 0.1077 26.15 15.39 24.52 57.01 5.87 3.86
9th Saint Peter's 0.0378 22.66 18.88 20.53 62.87 7.13 5.05
10th Manhattan 0.0203 22.18 20.14 20.82 63.01 7.71 6.22

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Fairfield 0.2158 37.31 15.73 34.79 46.31 6.49 6.81
2nd Iona 0.2444 37.02 12.59 34.37 50.89 4.59 7.07
3rd Siena 0.2573 38.73 13.00 36.22 47.29 4.07 8.81
4th Marist 0.2581 39.81 13.99 36.47 47.38 4.91 9.04
5th Niagara 0.2665 39.16 12.51 36.57 45.57 4.18 7.83
6th Canisius 0.2670 39.72 13.02 37.22 46.44 3.98 9.27
7th Quinnipiac 0.2767 40.45 12.78 36.67 45.08 4.15 7.60
8th Rider 0.2775 40.18 12.42 36.69 46.64 3.95 9.43
9th Saint Peter's 0.3613 48.36 12.23 43.86 37.78 3.66 11.83
10th Manhattan 0.3915 49.93 10.79 45.68 37.95 1.56 12.88

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,280.7769 1,288.8633 1,307.3830 1,308.4991 1,296.3806
Difference 8.0864 26.6061 27.7222 20.8049

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Fairfield 114 2,566 1,400 164 207 54.56 15.6 12.4 2,281 1,081 144 219 52.61 15.8 10.4
Canisius 104 2,258 1,241 190 180 54.96 11.9 12.5 2,233 1,190 189 160 46.71 11.8 14.0
Marist 107 2,199 1,167 171 168 53.07 12.9 13.1 2,095 1,078 194 220 48.54 10.8 9.5
Iona 107 2,381 1,267 185 210 53.21 12.9 11.3 2,315 1,205 149 216 47.95 15.5 10.7
Siena 112 2,422 1,266 209 252 52.27 11.6 9.6 2,404 1,245 192 179 48.21 12.5 13.4
Quinnipiac 107 2,293 1,211 195 147 52.81 11.8 15.6 2,261 1,219 152 175 46.09 14.9 12.9
Niagara 102 2,104 1,069 120 148 50.81 17.5 14.2 2,271 1,231 162 168 45.80 14.0 13.5
Rider 115 2,396 1,225 192 215 51.13 12.5 11.1 2,508 1,368 220 235 45.46 11.4 10.7
Saint Peter's 107 1,886 895 137 203 47.46 13.8 9.3 2,603 1,605 287 202 38.34 9.1 12.9
Manhattan 94 1,577 749 132 175 47.50 11.9 9.0 2,277 1,435 269 198 36.98 8.5 11.5
Conference Average 107 2,208 1,149 170 191 51.78 13.2 11.8 2,325 1,266 196 197 45.67 12.4 12.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the MAAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

66.22

2022-10-16
Siena
Canisius
3
2
23
25
25
22
18
25
25
23
15
10
GAME

65.51

2022-11-19 Kissimmee, FL
Fairfield
Quinnipiac
1
3
24
26
25
17
22
25
17
25
GAME

65.04

2022-10-29
Niagara
Iona
1
3
25
19
23
25
23
25
23
25
GAME

64.82

2022-10-05
Quinnipiac
Marist
2
3
22
25
25
21
14
25
25
21
10
15
GAME

64.40

2022-11-17 Kissimmee, FL
Iona
Quinnipiac
1
3
23
25
25
18
23
25
17
25
GAME

64.28

2022-11-17 Kissimmee, FL
Fairfield
Niagara
3
1
25
18
25
22
23
25
25
17
GAME

63.93

2022-11-18 Kissimmee, FL
Fairfield
Siena
3
1
25
21
18
25
25
18
25
22
GAME

63.89

2022-10-19
Rider
Iona
3
1
25
20
20
25
25
18
25
19
GAME

63.83

2022-10-15
Marist
Canisius
1
3
23
25
30
28
19
25
20
25
GAME

63.42

2022-10-12
Quinnipiac
Siena
1
3
22
25
26
24
24
26
22
25

HuskerGeek MAAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 25.9426
2 21.3728
3 20.8038
4 20.3775
5 19.6704
6 19.3668
7 19.3628
8 18.6708
9 18.6063
10 17.0652

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.4902
2 12.4698
3 11.9168
4 11.3663
5 11.2927
6 11.1397
7 10.9433
8 10.7209
9 10.5615
10 10.3073

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 24.6169
2 18.5649
3 15.7691
4 11.9068
5 11.7924
6 10.3383
7 10.2331
8 9.3398
9 8.9876
10 8.8753

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2425
2 0.2016
3 0.1981
4 0.1938
5 0.1917
6 0.1891
7 0.1877
8 0.1869
9 0.1777
10 0.1752

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1199
2 0.1190
3 0.1184
4 0.1140
5 0.1093
6 0.1085
7 0.1061
8 0.1051
9 0.1016
10 0.0999

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2301
2 0.1703
3 0.1516
4 0.1215
5 0.1188
6 0.1156
7 0.1061
8 0.1018
9 0.0997
10 0.0965


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek