Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

MEAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Howard 1,431.5354 1,397.4231 1,414.3764 39.23 54.52 -0.047
2nd Florida A&M 1,380.9607 1,357.2465 1,369.0522 38.29 50.08 -0.112
3rd Morgan St. 1,378.0517 1,338.2163 1,357.9879 36.39 50.22 -0.113
4th Bethune-Cookman 1,357.5101 1,326.1240 1,341.7253 36.78 49.62 -0.133
5th UMES 1,342.1484 1,322.6874 1,332.3823 35.87 49.83 -0.114
6th N.C. A&T 1,333.7618 1,312.6134 1,323.1453 34.58 48.41 -0.160
7th N.C. Central 1,301.8744 1,290.6089 1,296.2294 33.90 46.69 -0.199
8th Coppin St. 1,291.2801 1,265.0338 1,278.0896 32.53 45.69 -0.214
9th Norfolk St. 1,231.6065 1,210.5827 1,221.0493 29.32 43.55 -0.276
10th Delaware St. 1,209.1976 1,195.1382 1,202.1474 27.89 43.38 -0.326
11th Savannah St. 1,182.1173 1,161.5522 1,171.7896 29.43 40.38 -0.303
12th South Carolina St. 1,148.4691 1,130.5550 1,139.4769 27.03 37.33 -0.365

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Howard 0.1650 33.71 17.21 30.91 50.16 5.83 4.26
2nd UMES 0.1638 32.85 16.47 30.70 55.16 5.23 7.15
3rd Morgan St. 0.1509 31.60 16.51 29.24 53.30 5.72 5.60
4th Florida A&M 0.1391 29.65 15.74 27.23 56.02 6.33 4.08
5th Bethune-Cookman 0.1134 28.65 17.31 27.25 57.45 5.61 3.75
6th N.C. A&T 0.0917 30.88 21.71 28.14 52.41 6.10 5.54
7th Coppin St. 0.0916 30.13 20.97 27.38 51.78 7.69 4.07
8th N.C. Central 0.0770 26.59 18.90 25.21 59.34 6.85 3.54
9th Norfolk St. 0.0684 28.02 21.17 25.87 56.16 6.81 5.53
10th Delaware St. 0.0409 26.32 22.23 23.68 56.60 7.48 6.34
11th Savannah St. 0.0359 26.13 22.55 24.66 58.13 6.94 6.54
12th South Carolina St. 0.0066 24.10 23.44 21.39 59.45 8.57 5.87

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Howard 0.2118 35.72 14.54 32.45 50.20 4.20 5.56
2nd Bethune-Cookman 0.2466 38.92 14.26 36.27 47.48 5.68 6.84
3rd Florida A&M 0.2509 39.17 14.08 36.18 46.92 4.97 6.89
4th N.C. A&T 0.2514 39.42 14.28 36.31 46.04 4.60 7.59
5th Morgan St. 0.2644 40.71 14.27 37.79 45.50 4.77 6.62
6th N.C. Central 0.2755 41.03 13.47 38.98 44.58 5.25 7.01
7th UMES 0.2775 42.50 14.75 39.15 42.60 5.19 9.18
8th Coppin St. 0.3058 43.89 13.31 40.03 42.19 5.04 8.84
9th Savannah St. 0.3386 46.85 12.99 43.97 39.47 5.34 10.85
10th Norfolk St. 0.3446 46.73 12.27 42.85 38.83 4.15 9.27
11th Delaware St. 0.3670 48.05 11.35 43.83 39.44 3.25 8.28
12th South Carolina St. 0.3717 49.40 12.23 44.81 38.26 3.41 10.55

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,287.2876 1,289.3598 1,294.0946 1,298.7702 1,292.3781
Difference 2.0722 6.8069 11.4826 6.7872

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Howard 108 2,332 1,059 132 314 45.41 17.7 7.4 2,253 957 123 221 57.52 18.3 10.2
Morgan St. 109 2,433 1,100 181 282 45.21 13.4 8.6 2,353 1,029 138 217 56.27 17.1 10.8
N.C. A&T 88 1,885 863 153 257 45.78 12.3 7.3 1,854 832 127 185 55.12 14.6 10.0
Bethune-Cookman 123 2,567 1,169 145 165 45.54 17.7 15.6 2,546 1,151 163 256 54.79 15.6 9.9
Florida A&M 100 2,133 944 113 136 44.26 18.9 15.7 2,219 1,037 144 224 53.27 15.4 9.9
UMES 87 1,819 770 154 225 42.33 11.8 8.1 1,931 897 173 221 53.55 11.2 8.7
N.C. Central 91 1,901 823 106 117 43.29 17.9 16.2 2,034 977 128 180 51.97 15.9 11.3
Coppin St. 127 2,478 1,034 153 282 41.73 16.2 8.8 2,753 1,322 241 306 51.98 11.4 9.0
Norfolk St. 70 1,380 541 107 169 39.20 12.9 8.2 1,642 826 153 195 49.70 10.7 8.4
Delaware St. 99 1,808 659 150 207 36.45 12.1 8.7 2,296 1,171 189 243 49.00 12.1 9.4
Savannah St. 81 1,426 538 113 188 37.73 12.6 7.6 1,899 1,033 192 182 45.60 9.9 10.4
South Carolina St. 79 1,372 503 110 189 36.66 12.5 7.3 1,911 1,074 189 166 43.80 10.1 11.5
Conference Average 97 1,961 834 135 211 41.97 14.7 10.0 2,141 1,026 163 216 51.88 13.5 10.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the MEAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

65.61

2018-10-26 Baltimore, Md.
Morgan St.
Howard
1
3
25
20
22
25
23
25
21
25
GAME

65.20

2018-10-05 Daytona Beach, Fla.
Bethune-Cookman
Florida A&M
3
1
25
23
25
18
21
25
25
18
GAME

63.24

2018-09-28 Durham, N.C.
N.C. Central
Bethune-Cookman
3
2
23
15
17
25
25
21
23
25
16
14
GAME

63.24

2018-11-04 Washington, D.C.
Howard
UMES
2
3
25
21
26
28
25
21
23
25
12
15
GAME

62.33

2018-11-02 Tallahassee, Fla.
Florida A&M
Bethune-Cookman
3
1
25
23
17
25
25
21
28
26
GAME

62.32

2018-09-08 New Orleans, La.
Bethune-Cookman
Morgan St.
3
2
25
22
25
23
22
25
17
25
15
8
GAME

62.31

2018-11-11 Princess Anne, Md.
UMES
Morgan St.
3
0
26
24
26
24
25
20
GAME

62.10

2018-10-28 Tallahassee, Fla.
Florida A&M
N.C. Central
3
1
21
25
25
23
25
14
25
18
GAME

61.98

2018-11-18
Howard
N.C. A&T
3
0
25
23
27
25
25
16
GAME

61.66

2018-11-16
Florida A&M
Morgan St.
3
2
21
25
25
16
23
25
25
19
15
10

HuskerGeek MEAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.6970
2 23.0622
3 18.6078
4 18.4021
5 17.7661
6 16.5225
7 16.0601
8 15.9526
9 15.9270
10 15.8509

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.0258
2 12.1401
3 11.1590
4 10.7353
5 10.6830
6 10.4552
7 10.0617
8 9.2946
9 9.2748
10 9.2527

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.6558
2 15.0419
3 14.9713
4 12.6947
5 11.5263
6 11.1055
7 10.4962
8 9.6553
9 9.3551
10 8.8481

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2239
2 0.2148
3 0.2059
4 0.1707
5 0.1660
6 0.1652
7 0.1606
8 0.1564
9 0.1546
10 0.1529

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1459
2 0.1387
3 0.1074
4 0.1020
5 0.0977
6 0.0968
7 0.0938
8 0.0927
9 0.0909
10 0.0903

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1497
2 0.1433
3 0.1423
4 0.1361
5 0.1111
6 0.1076
7 0.1061
8 0.0897
9 0.0890
10 0.0885


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek