Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

MIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Gust. Adolphus 1,558.0629 1,568.3541 1,563.2000 60.45 68.45 0.262
2nd Saint Benedict 1,533.5339 1,555.4085 1,544.4325 58.83 68.41 0.259
3rd St. Thomas (MN) 1,526.9446 1,545.0158 1,535.9537 57.62 68.93 0.230
4th Augsburg 1,496.9970 1,519.6193 1,508.2657 57.33 66.73 0.236
5th Bethel (MN) 1,484.8915 1,507.3428 1,496.0750 55.85 66.86 0.206
6th St. Olaf 1,461.2196 1,481.4701 1,471.3100 54.24 65.10 0.178
7th Saint Mary's (MN) 1,402.3104 1,421.0440 1,411.6461 49.95 63.17 0.092
8th Concordia-M'head 1,388.7590 1,418.3571 1,403.4800 52.02 61.00 0.111
9th St. Catherine 1,389.3254 1,411.9455 1,400.5898 52.08 59.95 0.105
10th Hamline 1,365.5264 1,393.1665 1,379.2772 51.50 58.39 0.083
11th Carleton 1,328.3293 1,347.3727 1,337.8171 48.05 56.81 0.042
12th Macalester 1,204.8751 1,221.3601 1,213.0896 42.82 50.13 -0.074

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Gust. Adolphus 0.3006 41.83 11.77 38.95 44.96 3.18 11.13
2nd Augsburg 0.2946 39.02 9.56 36.19 49.57 2.09 8.23
3rd Saint Benedict 0.2938 38.59 9.21 36.38 50.70 2.90 7.94
4th St. Thomas (MN) 0.2793 40.76 12.83 38.56 45.50 4.35 8.82
5th St. Olaf 0.2785 43.10 15.26 40.70 42.32 3.92 8.57
6th Bethel (MN) 0.2757 38.04 10.46 35.96 51.62 2.41 9.66
7th Saint Mary's (MN) 0.2372 38.63 14.90 35.57 46.77 4.24 9.12
8th Concordia-M'head 0.2308 36.75 13.66 34.66 52.89 2.99 8.37
9th Carleton 0.2215 37.98 15.83 35.37 49.74 3.58 11.47
10th Hamline 0.2180 36.19 14.39 33.59 50.67 3.46 10.94
11th St. Catherine 0.2124 34.44 13.20 32.09 53.22 2.97 10.34
12th Macalester 0.1075 29.60 18.86 27.60 57.26 4.81 9.14

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Saint Benedict 0.0346 22.47 19.01 20.92 60.95 6.70 3.86
2nd Gust. Adolphus 0.0385 22.16 18.31 20.35 64.37 5.40 3.98
3rd St. Thomas (MN) 0.0494 23.79 18.85 22.53 63.18 6.26 4.67
4th Augsburg 0.0583 22.99 17.16 21.79 61.77 6.31 7.04
5th Bethel (MN) 0.0695 24.63 17.68 23.58 62.18 6.33 4.95
6th St. Olaf 0.1000 27.42 17.42 25.99 58.93 5.79 5.27
7th St. Catherine 0.1073 26.82 16.09 24.67 61.21 4.51 5.33
8th Concordia-M'head 0.1199 29.17 17.19 27.84 57.75 5.66 6.45
9th Hamline 0.1346 29.88 16.41 27.94 56.63 3.68 7.35
10th Saint Mary's (MN) 0.1455 29.56 15.01 26.80 57.48 3.56 4.33
11th Carleton 0.1798 35.46 17.48 32.99 48.90 5.15 9.20
12th Macalester 0.1811 34.26 16.16 31.34 53.50 3.67 9.74

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,438.7614 1,448.8847 1,450.8247 1,448.5611 1,446.7580
Difference 10.1233 12.0633 9.7997 10.6621

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Gust. Adolphus 113 2,505 1,274 211 228 50.86 11.9 11.0 2,106 851 107 161 59.59 19.7 13.1
Saint Benedict 123 2,655 1,330 154 145 50.09 17.2 18.3 2,272 913 129 179 59.82 17.6 12.7
St. Olaf 104 2,377 1,174 166 174 49.39 14.3 13.7 2,062 834 119 185 59.55 17.3 11.1
Augsburg 114 2,369 1,174 157 189 49.56 15.1 12.5 2,053 847 180 202 58.74 11.4 10.2
St. Thomas (MN) 123 2,825 1,367 170 159 48.39 16.6 17.8 2,474 992 142 191 59.90 17.4 13.0
Bethel (MN) 111 2,553 1,221 187 190 47.83 13.7 13.4 2,283 935 132 169 59.05 17.3 13.5
St. Catherine 95 2,094 1,006 191 187 48.04 11.0 11.2 1,994 905 117 155 54.61 17.0 12.9
Hamline 88 1,868 895 180 142 47.91 10.4 13.2 1,812 846 140 154 53.31 12.9 11.8
Carleton 85 1,738 783 172 143 45.05 10.1 12.2 1,801 849 174 159 52.86 10.4 11.3
Saint Mary's (MN) 108 2,195 928 151 153 42.28 14.5 14.3 2,286 1,023 128 207 55.25 17.9 11.0
Concordia-M'head 82 1,769 775 104 108 43.81 17.0 16.4 1,841 857 138 146 53.45 13.3 12.6
Macalester 97 1,857 793 156 185 42.70 11.9 10.0 2,207 1,152 228 214 47.80 9.7 10.3
Conference Average 104 2,234 1,060 167 167 47.16 13.6 13.7 2,099 917 145 177 56.16 15.2 12.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the MIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.62

2018-10-30 Arden Hills, Minn.
Bethel (MN)
Augsburg
2
3
25
20
30
28
21
25
19
25
13
15
GAME

75.15

2018-11-03 Saint Peter, Minn.
Gust. Adolphus
Saint Benedict
3
2
25
21
25
19
24
26
21
25
15
13
GAME

75.02

2018-10-24 Minneapolis, Minn.
Augsburg
Gust. Adolphus
1
3
26
24
20
25
20
25
16
25
GAME

74.88

2018-11-01 St. Joseph, Minn.
Saint Benedict
St. Thomas (MN)
3
2
22
25
25
16
23
25
25
13
15
13
GAME

72.76

2018-09-19 St. Joseph, Minn.
Saint Benedict
St. Thomas (MN)
3
1
20
25
25
21
25
23
25
20
GAME

72.58

2018-11-01 St. Peter, Minn.
Gust. Adolphus
Augsburg
3
2
25
19
23
25
20
25
25
20
15
6
GAME

72.43

2018-10-19 St. Peter, Minn.
Gust. Adolphus
Concordia-M'head
3
1
27
25
25
15
20
25
25
14
GAME

71.40

2018-10-20 Saint Peter, Minn.
Gust. Adolphus
Saint Benedict
3
1
20
25
25
7
25
17
25
23
GAME

70.50

2018-10-10
St. Thomas (MN)
Gust. Adolphus
1
3
20
25
21
25
25
19
22
25
GAME

70.20

2018-09-26 St. Paul, Minn.
St. Thomas (MN)
St. Olaf
3
1
25
22
25
13
22
25
25
20

HuskerGeek MIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.1119
2 23.4094
3 21.9610
4 20.5017
5 20.2143
6 20.0196
7 19.3772
8 19.1626
9 18.5595
10 18.3297

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.5813
2 13.7706
3 13.7121
4 12.7393
5 12.1149
6 11.9233
7 11.8051
8 11.7549
9 11.5744
10 10.0315

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.2542
2 17.6126
3 15.6610
4 15.6190
5 14.9826
6 14.8302
7 13.8282
8 13.0796
9 12.8784
10 12.3183

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2295
2 0.2233
3 0.2033
4 0.1963
5 0.1902
6 0.1856
7 0.1791
8 0.1743
9 0.1741
10 0.1713

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1443
2 0.1344
3 0.1296
4 0.1175
5 0.1120
6 0.1104
7 0.1098
8 0.1082
9 0.1060
10 0.1044

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1684
2 0.1574
3 0.1446
4 0.1441
5 0.1440
6 0.1432
7 0.1335
8 0.1328
9 0.1320
10 0.1211


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek