Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

MIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Gust. Adolphus 1,597.8881 1,597.2717 1,597.5799 62.99 59.16 0.264
2nd Bethel (MN) 1,574.0049 1,575.2069 1,574.6058 61.43 56.47 0.239
3rd Hamline 1,520.2336 1,516.3401 1,518.2856 60.88 51.94 0.160
4th St. Olaf 1,518.1199 1,515.9418 1,517.0305 57.71 55.85 0.178
5th Augsburg 1,497.4143 1,499.7695 1,498.5914 59.52 53.87 0.184
6th Saint Benedict 1,475.6192 1,474.3791 1,474.9990 57.42 51.43 0.105
7th St. Catherine 1,463.4413 1,461.1597 1,462.3001 59.58 49.19 0.109
8th St. Scholastica 1,411.8162 1,412.3786 1,412.0974 55.98 47.79 0.069
9th Saint Mary's (MN) 1,381.4460 1,381.7145 1,381.5802 54.34 47.74 0.017
10th Concordia-M'head 1,363.2019 1,357.2415 1,360.2184 56.06 45.16 0.027
11th Carleton 1,333.0367 1,333.2898 1,333.1632 48.59 51.32 0.001
12th Macalester 1,322.5616 1,324.7129 1,323.6368 50.40 45.91 0.015

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Gust. Adolphus 0.3200 42.13 10.12 38.86 39.81 2.41 10.04
2nd Bethel (MN) 0.2975 41.93 12.18 37.98 45.72 3.23 9.07
3rd Augsburg 0.2826 40.76 12.51 37.65 47.12 2.56 9.19
4th St. Olaf 0.2791 42.15 14.24 39.76 40.11 4.11 10.71
5th Hamline 0.2536 38.54 13.18 33.78 48.71 2.85 11.87
6th Saint Benedict 0.2161 36.51 14.90 33.43 48.94 4.21 9.87
7th St. Catherine 0.2070 33.95 13.26 29.52 48.70 2.89 9.96
8th St. Scholastica 0.2064 33.86 13.21 31.71 51.84 3.89 8.20
9th Carleton 0.1944 35.11 15.67 32.18 51.71 4.35 10.14
10th Saint Mary's (MN) 0.1916 34.70 15.54 31.84 49.90 3.82 9.04
11th Concordia-M'head 0.1679 30.80 14.01 28.24 56.52 3.32 9.59
12th Macalester 0.1458 31.96 17.38 30.66 53.53 4.60 9.15

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Gust. Adolphus 0.0563 22.60 16.97 20.40 57.89 5.12 3.59
2nd Bethel (MN) 0.0587 24.14 18.26 21.96 61.91 6.42 3.68
3rd Hamline 0.0931 26.15 16.84 23.85 59.53 5.18 4.43
4th St. Catherine 0.0978 26.54 16.76 23.44 54.01 4.78 6.52
5th Augsburg 0.0989 27.28 17.39 25.39 59.39 6.13 6.17
6th St. Olaf 0.1009 26.50 16.41 23.49 58.54 5.00 6.80
7th Saint Benedict 0.1115 26.43 15.27 23.73 60.19 3.58 4.97
8th Macalester 0.1312 30.61 17.49 27.66 54.84 4.75 6.55
9th St. Scholastica 0.1370 27.96 14.26 25.16 57.83 3.47 6.87
10th Concordia-M'head 0.1411 28.95 14.83 26.43 55.68 4.27 6.72
11th Saint Mary's (MN) 0.1741 33.07 15.65 29.57 52.29 4.42 6.26
12th Carleton 0.1934 34.81 15.47 31.58 48.14 4.90 9.87

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,454.5074 1,453.2872 1,453.1378 1,457.7664 1,454.6747
Difference -1.2202 -1.3695 3.2591 0.2231

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Gust. Adolphus 117 2,380 1,355 199 252 56.93 12.0 9.4 1,971 917 105 162 53.48 18.8 12.2
Bethel (MN) 104 2,211 1,228 153 160 55.54 14.5 13.8 1,881 917 103 150 51.25 18.3 12.5
Hamline 107 1,948 1,107 219 195 56.83 8.9 10.0 1,679 865 107 156 48.48 15.7 10.8
Augsburg 102 2,082 1,112 145 163 53.41 14.4 12.8 2,005 1,023 165 156 48.98 12.2 12.9
St. Olaf 99 1,873 955 163 196 50.99 11.5 9.6 1,823 905 163 153 50.36 11.2 11.9
St. Catherine 87 1,761 973 139 147 55.25 12.7 12.0 1,713 928 134 147 45.83 12.8 11.7
Concordia-M'head 82 1,386 767 135 113 55.34 10.3 12.3 1,440 815 129 127 43.40 11.2 11.3
Saint Benedict 77 1,439 720 113 90 50.04 12.7 16.0 1,536 827 102 126 46.16 15.1 12.2
St. Scholastica 59 1,242 634 69 60 51.05 18.0 20.7 1,359 761 109 118 44.00 12.5 11.5
Carleton 96 1,667 773 158 189 46.37 10.6 8.8 1,932 1,008 233 182 47.83 8.3 10.6
Saint Mary's (MN) 96 1,561 789 139 153 50.55 11.2 10.2 1,773 1,000 162 200 43.60 10.9 8.9
Macalester 91 1,540 773 138 175 50.20 11.2 8.8 1,689 947 144 158 43.93 11.7 10.7
Conference Average 93 1,758 932 148 158 52.71 12.3 12.0 1,733 909 138 153 47.27 13.2 11.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the MIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.68

2021-09-15 Moorhead , Minn.
Concordia-M'head
Augsburg
0
3
25
27
17
25
16
25
GAME

74.69

2021-10-22
Augsburg
Bethel (MN)
2
3
23
25
25
23
21
25
27
25
12
15
GAME

74.28

2021-10-30
Bethel (MN)
Hamline
3
2
25
19
25
22
21
25
21
25
16
14
GAME

73.31

2021-10-09
Gust. Adolphus
St. Olaf
3
2
22
25
21
25
25
23
25
18
15
4
GAME

73.23

2021-09-22
Saint Benedict
Hamline
1
3
26
28
21
25
25
22
21
25
GAME

72.94

2021-11-06
Gust. Adolphus
Bethel (MN)
3
1
15
25
27
25
25
21
25
18
GAME

72.74

2021-10-16
Augsburg
St. Olaf
1
3
22
25
27
25
22
25
23
25
GAME

72.63

2021-10-15
Bethel (MN)
St. Olaf
3
2
25
21
25
16
19
25
25
27
15
6
GAME

72.09

2021-11-05
Bethel (MN)
Hamline
3
1
25
23
25
18
16
25
25
20
GAME

71.24

2021-10-22
St. Olaf
Saint Benedict
0
3
24
26
25
27
24
26

HuskerGeek MIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 20.4219
2 20.2387
3 19.7884
4 17.8739
5 17.1143
6 16.5791
7 16.0804
8 15.2413
9 15.0892
10 14.6000

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.6760
2 12.8406
3 12.6763
4 11.4243
5 10.0596
6 9.1875
7 9.0098
8 8.5926
9 8.0791
10 8.0307

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.8068
2 14.3481
3 12.6115
4 12.3486
5 11.5842
6 11.3997
7 11.0955
8 10.9309
9 10.8898
10 10.6492

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2275
2 0.2255
3 0.2127
4 0.2086
5 0.1912
6 0.1881
7 0.1827
8 0.1802
9 0.1775
10 0.1756

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1457
2 0.1425
3 0.1332
4 0.1324
5 0.1203
6 0.1102
7 0.1026
8 0.0995
9 0.0985
10 0.0929

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2093
2 0.1734
3 0.1647
4 0.1450
5 0.1438
6 0.1433
7 0.1393
8 0.1341
9 0.1273
10 0.1225


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek