Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

MVC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st UNI 1,627.9489 1,588.6945 1,608.2019 48.07 66.31 0.126
2nd Illinois St. 1,620.9302 1,593.1581 1,606.9842 50.22 64.15 0.135
3rd Valparaiso 1,566.9497 1,538.2915 1,552.5544 45.78 62.55 0.056
4th Missouri St. 1,539.3748 1,511.9499 1,525.6007 46.60 58.60 0.049
5th Bradley 1,528.7781 1,501.9566 1,515.3080 43.57 61.41 0.034
6th Loyola Chicago 1,518.6323 1,487.6643 1,503.0686 43.40 59.70 0.029
7th Drake 1,515.6472 1,489.4215 1,502.4771 43.62 59.54 0.017
8th Indiana St. 1,455.4678 1,422.8892 1,439.0863 40.70 56.13 -0.015
9th Evansville 1,448.2585 1,426.0792 1,437.1261 40.55 54.57 -0.060
10th Southern Ill. 1,403.0725 1,379.6335 1,391.3036 38.86 52.64 -0.077

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st UNI 0.2835 42.46 14.11 39.81 43.04 4.25 5.18
2nd Illinois St. 0.2759 40.07 12.48 37.23 46.08 4.69 5.28
3rd Loyola Chicago 0.2349 37.68 14.19 35.47 48.76 5.69 6.09
4th Valparaiso 0.2227 35.63 13.36 33.11 50.22 5.45 4.87
5th Missouri St. 0.2221 37.40 15.19 35.31 47.79 6.57 4.72
6th Bradley 0.2092 34.27 13.35 31.95 52.90 5.42 5.93
7th Drake 0.1952 33.95 14.43 31.80 52.14 6.04 5.02
8th Indiana St. 0.1912 33.77 14.65 31.46 52.65 5.44 4.05
9th Evansville 0.1754 35.15 17.61 33.60 48.86 6.93 6.49
10th Southern Ill. 0.1503 30.97 15.94 29.11 56.47 5.60 5.23

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Illinois St. 0.1407 30.24 16.17 28.18 54.64 6.01 4.63
2nd UNI 0.1574 30.73 14.99 28.72 56.34 5.18 4.66
3rd Valparaiso 0.1669 31.92 15.22 30.47 54.60 5.60 4.62
4th Missouri St. 0.1728 33.11 15.83 30.98 53.08 5.99 4.46
5th Bradley 0.1749 31.74 14.25 30.10 57.08 4.56 4.42
6th Drake 0.1787 33.16 15.29 31.19 52.53 5.46 5.33
7th Indiana St. 0.2058 35.94 15.36 34.04 49.53 5.23 5.30
8th Loyola Chicago 0.2063 36.81 16.18 34.68 48.71 6.67 6.85
9th Southern Ill. 0.2269 37.68 14.99 35.52 49.31 5.26 6.57
10th Evansville 0.2351 37.33 13.81 34.57 49.74 4.49 5.08

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,508.1711 1,510.2757 1,506.3492 1,511.6136 1,509.1024
Difference 2.1046 -1.8219 3.4425 1.2417

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Illinois St. 115 2,663 1,279 124 196 48.03 21.5 13.6 2,309 900 105 200 61.02 22.0 11.5
Valparaiso 146 3,239 1,468 145 209 45.32 22.3 15.5 2,948 1,162 130 238 60.58 22.7 12.4
UNI 126 2,878 1,271 119 183 44.16 24.2 15.7 2,649 1,021 132 194 61.46 20.1 13.7
Bradley 127 2,886 1,295 172 220 44.87 16.8 13.1 2,648 1,045 109 184 60.54 24.3 14.4
Drake 125 2,785 1,228 132 201 44.09 21.1 13.9 2,702 1,141 138 217 57.77 19.6 12.5
Loyola Chicago 108 2,385 1,032 136 168 43.27 17.5 14.2 2,355 987 153 210 58.09 15.4 11.2
Missouri St. 118 2,567 1,162 110 137 45.27 23.3 18.7 2,512 1,106 108 152 55.97 23.3 16.5
Evansville 121 2,451 1,016 156 277 41.45 15.7 8.8 2,644 1,226 122 204 53.63 21.7 13.0
Indiana St. 111 2,339 937 90 144 40.06 26.0 16.2 2,548 1,166 128 218 54.24 19.9 11.7
Southern Ill. 106 2,071 791 102 165 38.19 20.3 12.6 2,472 1,224 157 208 50.49 15.7 11.9
Conference Average 120 2,626 1,148 129 190 43.47 20.9 14.2 2,579 1,098 128 203 57.38 20.5 12.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the MVC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

77.64

2018-10-27 Terre Haute, Ind.
Indiana St.
Bradley
3
1
29
27
28
26
21
25
26
24
GAME

76.05

2018-11-24 Springfield, Mo.
Illinois St.
UNI
1
3
16
25
22
25
28
26
22
25
GAME

75.16

2018-10-13 Springfield, Mo.
Missouri St.
UNI
2
3
11
25
25
22
22
25
25
23
15
17
GAME

75.14

2018-11-23 Springfield, Mo.
UNI
Valparaiso
3
1
25
22
22
25
25
21
25
22
GAME

74.91

2018-11-16 Evansville, Ind.
Evansville
UNI
3
2
25
22
23
25
25
27
25
22
15
9
GAME

74.83

2018-11-22 Springfield, Mo.
Missouri St.
Valparaiso
2
3
17
25
25
20
23
25
25
23
9
15
GAME

74.68

2018-11-23 Springfield, Mo.
Drake
Illinois St.
0
3
23
25
22
25
25
27
GAME

74.38

2018-10-05 Valparaiso, Ind.
Valparaiso
Loyola Chicago
3
2
19
25
23
25
25
19
25
22
15
12
GAME

74.27

2018-10-06 Des Moines, Iowa
Drake
Illinois St.
1
3
19
25
22
25
29
27
20
25
GAME

74.11

2018-11-03 Normal, Ill.
Illinois St.
UNI
3
2
25
20
24
26
25
14
22
25
15
11

HuskerGeek MVC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.7894
2 29.5731
3 28.5705
4 28.5297
5 27.7535
6 26.9407
7 26.4042
8 25.5935
9 25.5427
10 25.3420

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 21.2009
2 19.0001
3 17.6894
4 17.1674
5 16.2130
6 15.1959
7 14.7153
8 14.6575
9 14.0257
10 13.9370

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 25.2016
2 21.9064
3 20.1362
4 19.3688
5 18.9887
6 18.7924
7 17.7948
8 16.1597
9 15.8899
10 15.8413

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2352
2 0.2346
3 0.2283
4 0.2267
5 0.2183
6 0.2081
7 0.2079
8 0.2049
9 0.2026
10 0.2023

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1669
2 0.1508
3 0.1362
4 0.1318
5 0.1299
6 0.1288
7 0.1280
8 0.1264
9 0.1236
10 0.1212

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1984
2 0.1751
3 0.1641
4 0.1569
5 0.1500
6 0.1491
7 0.1456
8 0.1427
9 0.1401
10 0.1393


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek