Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Metro Atlantic - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Niagara 1,384.3595 1,358.6891 1,371.4642 40.31 58.55 -0.019
2nd Fairfield 1,331.5491 1,326.2885 1,328.9162 40.64 53.15 -0.061
3rd Canisius 1,293.2971 1,295.2139 1,294.2552 35.67 54.95 -0.107
4th Iona 1,290.3927 1,282.4373 1,286.4089 40.23 51.12 -0.076
5th Marist 1,293.6093 1,272.3763 1,282.9489 35.04 54.59 -0.104
6th Siena 1,271.4766 1,272.7538 1,272.1150 37.42 51.45 -0.108
7th Manhattan 1,275.1129 1,262.8707 1,268.9771 38.22 52.33 -0.113
8th Loyola Maryland 1,198.2319 1,176.3249 1,187.2279 35.37 47.16 -0.187
9th Rider 1,183.4862 1,181.7052 1,182.5954 36.12 44.17 -0.186
10th Saint Peter's 1,004.3362 1,000.9388 1,002.6361 25.90 37.85 -0.359

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Niagara 0.1999 34.09 14.10 31.70 52.19 5.01 6.21
2nd Marist 0.1757 34.14 16.57 31.81 50.58 7.05 3.79
3rd Fairfield 0.1664 34.70 18.06 32.32 49.47 6.02 4.82
4th Canisius 0.1583 32.40 16.57 29.84 51.66 6.84 4.91
5th Iona 0.1574 30.54 14.81 28.55 56.04 5.67 6.15
6th Manhattan 0.1526 31.75 16.49 29.14 51.77 6.45 4.87
7th Siena 0.1232 29.50 17.18 26.79 53.13 7.49 6.37
8th Rider 0.1176 26.24 14.47 24.49 58.64 5.92 6.02
9th Loyola Maryland 0.0974 29.05 19.31 26.66 53.37 7.10 6.92
10th Saint Peter's 0.0159 21.60 20.01 19.92 63.38 7.34 3.62

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Niagara 0.2188 35.00 13.12 32.16 53.00 3.33 5.12
2nd Fairfield 0.2276 35.94 13.19 32.54 52.41 4.09 5.78
3rd Siena 0.2312 37.37 14.25 34.24 47.54 4.90 5.47
4th Iona 0.2338 37.24 13.86 35.10 51.56 4.09 7.32
5th Canisius 0.2653 41.16 14.62 38.09 44.43 4.74 6.24
6th Manhattan 0.2658 40.23 13.65 37.15 47.36 4.35 6.69
7th Marist 0.2793 42.49 14.56 39.72 44.30 5.28 6.22
8th Loyola Maryland 0.2842 41.97 13.55 38.67 45.56 3.32 7.17
9th Rider 0.3032 42.25 11.93 39.42 42.58 3.26 9.61
10th Saint Peter's 0.3744 50.20 12.75 45.94 35.62 4.18 9.85

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,247.7545 1,262.9306 1,265.3221 1,277.6125 1,263.4049
Difference 15.1761 17.5677 29.8580 20.8672

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Niagara 119 2,746 1,257 203 297 45.78 13.5 9.2 2,471 958 124 266 61.23 19.9 9.3
Fairfield 114 2,527 1,178 157 221 46.62 16.1 11.4 2,412 1,049 142 198 56.51 17.0 12.2
Iona 94 2,056 968 155 183 47.08 13.3 11.2 1,965 877 145 199 55.37 13.6 9.9
Manhattan 115 2,436 1,107 157 137 45.44 15.5 17.8 2,347 1,025 163 212 56.33 14.4 11.1
Canisius 108 2,404 1,016 149 235 42.26 16.1 10.2 2,367 977 151 226 58.72 15.7 10.5
Marist 102 1,951 820 112 180 42.03 17.4 10.8 1,941 821 141 182 57.70 13.8 10.7
Siena 108 2,313 1,002 172 271 43.32 13.4 8.5 2,395 1,087 132 206 54.61 18.1 11.6
Rider 113 2,295 1,019 170 183 44.40 13.5 12.5 2,525 1,267 242 234 49.82 10.4 10.8
Loyola Maryland 112 2,235 927 185 252 41.48 12.1 8.9 2,535 1,253 186 230 50.57 13.6 11.0
Saint Peter's 100 1,656 567 89 202 34.24 18.6 8.2 2,418 1,375 240 224 43.14 10.1 10.8
Conference Average 109 2,262 986 155 216 43.26 15.0 10.9 2,338 1,069 167 218 54.40 14.7 10.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Metro Atlantic

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

67.52

2011-10-15 Fairfield, Conn.
Fairfield
Iona
3
2
34
32
14
25
25
11
22
25
16
14
GAME

67.33

2011-10-30 Jersey City, N.J.
Manhattan
Niagara
2
3
25
16
14
25
21
25
25
22
21
23
GAME

66.81

2011-11-20 Jersey City, NJ
Fairfield
Niagara
1
3
25
23
17
25
32
34
18
25
GAME

63.94

2011-11-06 Riverdale, N.Y.
Manhattan
Iona
3
2
21
25
12
25
25
22
25
11
17
15
GAME

63.56

2011-10-22 Niagara Univ., N.Y.
Niagara
Fairfield
3
1
18
25
25
19
25
23
25
21
GAME

63.10

2011-10-08 POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y.
Marist
Niagara
2
3
17
25
25
19
21
25
27
25
10
15
GAME

62.83

2011-10-01 New Rochelle, NY
Iona
Rider
3
2
26
24
21
25
24
26
25
21
15
13
GAME

62.82

2011-10-02 Buffalo, N.Y.
Canisius
Manhattan
2
3
25
23
22
25
15
25
25
20
15
17
GAME

62.69

2011-10-25 New Rochelle, NY
Iona
Siena
0
3
25
27
20
25
27
29
GAME

62.37

2011-10-05 Fairfield, Conn.
Fairfield
Siena
3
1
25
22
32
30
25
27
26
24

HuskerGeek Metro Atlantic All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.8700
2 22.7137
3 22.2003
4 21.7140
5 21.2625
6 20.4204
7 18.3542
8 18.3329
9 18.1093
10 17.4104

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.9314
2 14.6411
3 13.6679
4 11.5298
5 11.1750
6 11.0001
7 10.8229
8 10.7913
9 10.0487
10 9.6572

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.7075
2 17.9043
3 16.3717
4 15.3244
5 14.4648
6 11.7136
7 11.2020
8 10.8405
9 10.6434
10 10.3717

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2103
2 0.2094
3 0.2090
4 0.1974
5 0.1905
6 0.1798
7 0.1791
8 0.1787
9 0.1740
10 0.1713

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1381
2 0.1310
3 0.1224
4 0.1160
5 0.1149
6 0.1068
7 0.1035
8 0.1030
9 0.1019
10 0.1011

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1824
2 0.1742
3 0.1658
4 0.1580
5 0.1491
6 0.1085
7 0.1075
8 0.0959
9 0.0951
10 0.0941


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek