Nerdly Nebraska.

2022-2023 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Texas 1,730.6611

Football georgia 11.6118
Men's Basketball houston 9.4563
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.7610
Softball columbia 5.0000
Ice Hockey minnesota 8.5914
Men's Lacrosse marquette 7.9259
Men's Soccer kentucky 8.7687
Women's Soccer ucla 11.0741
Men's Volleyball long beach st 9.3011
Women's Volleyball texas 12.4762
Field Hockey north carolina 10.0384

Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Calvin 1,617.4250 1,611.5369 1,614.4783 65.80 61.12 0.294
2nd Hope 1,535.9437 1,533.4016 1,534.6721 60.57 56.56 0.229
3rd Albion 1,526.0428 1,527.4874 1,526.7649 61.59 57.12 0.208
4th Adrian 1,392.5295 1,388.6860 1,390.6064 59.04 47.96 0.056
5th Trine 1,376.5485 1,376.2882 1,376.4183 56.11 46.94 0.062
6th Alma 1,304.2760 1,299.8658 1,302.0691 52.06 46.86 -0.007
7th St. Mary's (IN) 1,272.9804 1,269.5364 1,271.2572 49.77 45.95 -0.026
8th Kalamazoo 1,261.6636 1,256.5719 1,259.1152 51.68 42.88 -0.071
9th Olivet 1,242.3028 1,237.6660 1,239.9822 46.30 44.36 -0.084

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Calvin 0.3337 43.51 10.13 41.05 42.55 3.69 11.47
2nd Hope 0.3151 42.86 11.34 40.19 42.35 3.12 11.16
3rd Albion 0.2995 41.29 11.34 37.43 46.72 3.31 11.78
4th Adrian 0.1720 31.62 14.41 28.99 51.42 3.78 11.49
5th Trine 0.1697 33.05 16.08 30.55 54.15 3.18 10.52
6th St. Mary's (IN) 0.1643 32.47 16.04 30.94 55.29 4.98 10.08
7th Alma 0.1491 31.10 16.19 29.48 55.69 3.25 11.28
8th Olivet 0.1130 29.43 18.13 27.90 55.82 4.62 11.41
9th Kalamazoo 0.0976 29.14 19.38 27.28 54.07 5.16 9.39

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Calvin 0.0402 22.45 18.43 20.85 63.88 5.50 6.09
2nd Hope 0.0857 24.59 16.02 21.48 60.50 5.60 6.06
3rd Albion 0.0914 27.74 18.60 25.46 57.10 6.51 5.82
4th Trine 0.1079 28.42 17.64 26.71 58.20 5.47 8.30
5th Adrian 0.1156 27.54 15.98 24.71 57.93 4.52 6.19
6th Alma 0.1557 31.48 15.91 29.21 54.57 4.70 8.26
7th Kalamazoo 0.1686 34.01 17.15 30.63 49.86 4.08 10.23
8th St. Mary's (IN) 0.1902 34.15 15.12 31.25 48.57 3.28 9.29
9th Olivet 0.1966 35.09 15.43 32.20 52.65 3.43 12.03

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,390.5960 1,380.1290 1,373.4232 1,356.3646 1,375.1282
Difference -10.4669 -17.1728 -34.2314 -20.6237

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Calvin 105 2,417 1,428 218 212 59.08 11.1 11.4 1,914 862 156 176 54.96 12.3 10.9
Albion 113 2,301 1,341 249 201 58.28 9.2 11.4 1,925 916 159 188 52.42 12.1 10.2
Hope 113 2,224 1,186 232 223 53.33 9.6 10.0 2,027 1,016 182 192 49.88 11.1 10.6
Adrian 88 1,478 838 186 185 56.70 7.9 8.0 1,447 805 129 169 44.37 11.2 8.6
Trine 82 1,709 929 154 186 54.36 11.1 9.2 1,732 968 168 170 44.11 10.3 10.2
Alma 94 1,738 862 177 154 49.60 9.8 11.3 2,011 1,137 200 198 43.46 10.1 10.2
St. Mary's (IN) 89 1,456 716 146 154 49.18 10.0 9.5 1,699 973 220 173 42.73 7.7 9.8
Kalamazoo 69 1,164 581 107 128 49.91 10.9 9.1 1,477 894 185 162 39.47 8.0 9.1
Olivet 90 1,596 743 187 170 46.55 8.5 9.4 1,925 1,103 254 192 42.70 7.6 10.0
Conference Average 94 1,787 958 184 179 53.00 9.8 9.9 1,795 964 184 180 46.01 10.0 9.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn.

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.98

2022-09-20
Hope
Albion
3
2
25
22
24
26
21
25
26
24
15
11
GAME

73.49

2022-10-27
Calvin
Albion
3
1
25
19
24
26
25
16
25
15
GAME

72.54

2022-11-12
Calvin
Hope
2
3
22
25
25
16
17
25
25
23
12
15
GAME

69.25

2022-09-28
Calvin
Hope
3
0
25
20
25
21
25
12
GAME

67.91

2022-11-05
Calvin
Albion
3
0
25
20
25
14
25
20
GAME

67.51

2022-10-21
Hope
Calvin
0
3
15
25
12
25
19
25
GAME

67.17

2022-10-07
Albion
Adrian
3
1
25
14
26
24
20
25
25
15
GAME

66.78

2022-11-04 Grand Rapids, MI
Hope
Albion
0
3
19
25
20
25
14
25
GAME

65.24

2022-10-18
Calvin
Adrian
3
0
25
12
25
17
25
21
GAME

64.27

2022-09-24
Albion
Trine
3
0
25
19
25
18
25
20

HuskerGeek Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.4870
2 21.2951
3 19.6661
4 19.0551
5 17.7728
6 17.0800
7 16.0888
8 15.0360
9 13.6677
10 13.4844

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.2775
2 13.7190
3 13.4641
4 12.5598
5 12.4843
6 11.5505
7 8.5175
8 8.3850
9 7.8112
10 6.9156

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.0511
2 12.0462
3 11.3596
4 11.1910
5 9.6899
6 9.6127
7 9.4678
8 9.2094
9 9.0709
10 8.7027

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2578
2 0.2088
3 0.1986
4 0.1953
5 0.1906
6 0.1693
7 0.1685
8 0.1675
9 0.1649
10 0.1609

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1608
2 0.1372
3 0.1360
4 0.1345
5 0.1256
6 0.1155
7 0.0948
8 0.0916
9 0.0835
10 0.0831

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1479
2 0.1378
3 0.1243
4 0.1217
5 0.1196
6 0.1136
7 0.1127
8 0.0969
9 0.0952
10 0.0926


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek