Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,724.7831

Football ohio st 10.8908
Ice Hockey michigan 5.0000
Men's Soccer marshall 10.0965
Women's Soccer penn st 9.9817
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.7753
Field Hockey northwestern 9.9036

Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Hope 1,630.4168 1,628.1252 1,629.2706 63.34 58.37 0.298
2nd Calvin 1,630.7661 1,627.1141 1,628.9391 64.18 57.09 0.304
3rd Albion 1,496.5309 1,496.1433 1,496.3371 60.45 54.43 0.184
4th Adrian 1,481.0310 1,476.9877 1,479.0080 60.47 51.15 0.100
5th Trine 1,413.6385 1,407.1590 1,410.3950 56.75 46.20 0.080
6th Alma 1,345.1583 1,345.0198 1,345.0890 54.08 44.99 0.011
7th Olivet 1,337.7369 1,337.5275 1,337.6322 52.12 47.80 -0.013
8th Kalamazoo 1,326.2221 1,320.3784 1,323.2970 52.86 43.78 0.000
9th St. Mary's (IN) 1,320.8432 1,319.4191 1,320.1309 52.19 45.74 -0.036

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Hope 0.3274 43.08 10.35 38.69 43.88 2.71 11.11
2nd Calvin 0.3215 45.65 13.50 42.39 40.80 3.72 11.11
3rd Albion 0.2590 36.90 11.00 32.92 51.37 3.51 10.70
4th Trine 0.2101 35.71 14.70 33.37 49.56 3.73 9.55
5th Adrian 0.1889 32.09 13.21 29.14 53.42 3.53 12.58
6th Alma 0.1728 33.07 15.79 30.64 53.18 3.40 9.28
7th Olivet 0.1531 31.23 15.92 28.86 53.11 4.61 8.39
8th Kalamazoo 0.1463 32.41 17.78 29.71 50.56 4.15 9.32
9th St. Mary's (IN) 0.1356 31.55 17.99 29.09 53.38 5.34 7.54

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Calvin 0.0178 22.42 20.64 21.70 61.63 7.22 5.86
2nd Hope 0.0295 21.03 18.08 19.43 64.30 6.01 5.57
3rd Albion 0.0745 25.59 18.14 23.45 58.62 6.09 6.56
4th Adrian 0.0886 26.67 17.81 24.14 56.07 5.37 5.90
5th Trine 0.1302 29.15 16.13 26.37 54.24 5.20 7.96
6th Kalamazoo 0.1461 31.32 16.71 27.85 54.39 4.64 9.90
7th Alma 0.1614 31.65 15.51 29.91 54.93 4.55 7.17
8th Olivet 0.1660 30.44 13.84 28.38 57.05 3.38 7.83
9th St. Mary's (IN) 0.1715 34.07 16.92 31.15 53.08 3.63 11.16

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,441.1221 1,431.5282 1,413.6923 1,411.4974 1,424.4600
Difference -9.5939 -27.4298 -29.6248 -22.2162

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Hope 57 1,350 753 117 99 55.78 11.5 13.6 1,122 529 75 69 52.85 15.0 16.3
Calvin 58 1,353 761 111 124 56.25 12.2 10.9 1,135 556 83 116 51.01 13.7 9.8
Albion 66 1,462 797 113 117 54.51 12.9 12.5 1,442 737 113 112 48.89 12.8 12.9
Adrian 49 1,017 568 110 87 55.85 9.2 11.7 1,019 547 68 93 46.32 15.0 11.0
Olivet 65 1,180 645 127 115 54.66 9.3 10.3 1,108 584 122 144 47.29 9.1 7.7
St. Mary's (IN) 40 704 389 65 81 55.26 10.8 8.7 733 399 96 87 45.57 7.6 8.4
Alma 69 1,518 825 136 112 54.35 11.2 13.6 1,518 851 120 131 43.94 12.7 11.6
Trine 52 1,071 576 102 92 53.78 10.5 11.6 1,101 628 109 96 42.96 10.1 11.5
Kalamazoo 38 669 348 61 91 52.02 11.0 7.4 767 449 85 90 41.46 9.0 8.5
Conference Average 55 1,147 629 105 102 54.72 11.0 11.1 1,105 587 97 104 46.70 11.7 10.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn.

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

69.58

2023-09-26
Trine
Adrian
1
3
25
23
17
25
22
25
25
27
GAME

65.15

2023-09-30
Trine
Albion
0
3
22
25
22
25
19
25
GAME

64.60

2023-09-29
Alma
Adrian
0
3
26
28
15
25
19
25
GAME

63.05

2023-10-03
Alma
Albion
0
3
22
25
20
25
21
25
GAME

62.80

2023-09-29
Hope
Kalamazoo
3
0
25
18
25
9
25
20
GAME

62.60

2023-09-29
Calvin
St. Mary's (IN)
3
0
25
14
25
15
25
19
GAME

62.35

2023-09-26
Kalamazoo
St. Mary's (IN)
3
2
25
22
25
23
25
27
23
25
15
12
GAME

59.74

2023-09-26 Olivet, Mich.
Olivet
Alma
3
1
25
17
25
17
23
25
25
20
GAME

48.98

2023-09-26
Albion
Hope
1
3
19
25
12
25
30
28
22
25

HuskerGeek Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 14.5246
2 14.3345
3 11.8083
4 11.5994
5 11.1444
6 9.6782
7 9.6583
8 9.6117
9 9.5981
10 9.4338

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.4226
2 8.0502
3 7.2823
4 6.8123
5 6.2718
6 5.6901
7 5.3488
8 5.3042
9 4.8204
10 4.8138

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 9.0787
2 8.6045
3 7.6545
4 7.5077
5 7.1530
6 7.0943
7 6.4744
8 6.0277
9 5.8401
10 4.9602

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2343
2 0.2315
3 0.2312
4 0.2285
5 0.2210
6 0.2000
7 0.1965
8 0.1908
9 0.1848
10 0.1715

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1520
2 0.1428
3 0.1355
4 0.1298
5 0.1206
6 0.1175
7 0.1089
8 0.1003
9 0.0922
10 0.0869

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1788
2 0.1448
3 0.1403
4 0.1397
5 0.1388
6 0.1320
7 0.1221
8 0.1191
9 0.1120
10 0.1113


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek