Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Louisville 1,717.9455

Football georgia 12.7744
Men's Soccer new hampshire 10.6445
Women's Soccer north carolina 11.4036
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.1463
Field Hockey penn st 9.6697

Mid-America Intercollegiate - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Central Mo. 1,726.3042 1,723.7872 1,725.0452 80.29 72.94 0.287
2nd Washburn 1,704.7103 1,702.6089 1,703.6593 74.68 79.03 0.299
3rd Neb.-Kearney 1,662.8298 1,659.3806 1,661.1043 72.12 85.34 0.218
4th Northwest Mo. St. 1,661.2895 1,659.7350 1,660.5121 75.00 75.14 0.228
5th Central Okla. 1,640.0686 1,634.2080 1,637.1357 75.68 75.88 0.184
6th Pittsburg St. 1,594.6268 1,591.3016 1,592.9634 75.32 71.76 0.157
7th Missouri Western 1,557.9511 1,557.3330 1,557.6420 75.65 68.07 0.133
8th Fort Hays St. 1,525.2780 1,519.6053 1,522.4390 66.86 73.20 0.096
9th Newman 1,497.9492 1,494.2554 1,496.1012 69.22 69.93 0.075
10th Emporia St. 1,459.6836 1,457.0801 1,458.3812 69.68 63.70 0.004
11th Mo. Southern St. 1,413.1149 1,410.6568 1,411.8853 63.05 62.35 -0.040

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Washburn 0.4402 45.04 1.02 40.47 43.30 2.70 6.03
2nd Central Mo. 0.3897 41.27 2.30 37.47 45.65 3.59 7.29
3rd Neb.-Kearney 0.3818 41.34 3.16 38.12 45.70 5.32 6.34
4th Central Okla. 0.3802 40.41 2.40 35.90 45.27 4.14 6.85
5th Northwest Mo. St. 0.3750 41.72 4.22 38.01 42.88 3.96 9.73
6th Pittsburg St. 0.3630 41.95 5.66 37.97 42.46 3.97 8.64
7th Missouri Western 0.3349 37.33 3.84 34.56 50.41 3.92 9.95
8th Newman 0.3090 34.21 3.32 31.11 52.79 4.17 5.63
9th Fort Hays St. 0.3088 36.50 5.62 34.00 49.68 5.32 4.64
10th Mo. Southern St. 0.2578 33.19 7.41 29.99 50.25 4.71 8.34
11th Emporia St. 0.2424 30.40 6.17 26.44 53.90 4.12 5.82

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Central Mo. 0.1027 21.74 11.47 20.33 62.33 6.52 5.09
2nd Washburn 0.1408 25.40 11.33 23.21 59.11 7.49 6.29
3rd Northwest Mo. St. 0.1469 22.80 8.11 21.01 62.70 5.16 4.67
4th Neb.-Kearney 0.1642 26.67 10.25 25.32 59.13 5.97 5.61
5th Central Okla. 0.1961 27.87 8.26 26.08 57.30 5.06 6.58
6th Missouri Western 0.2017 29.35 9.18 26.81 55.81 4.97 7.42
7th Pittsburg St. 0.2056 29.35 8.79 26.97 55.72 4.33 6.22
8th Fort Hays St. 0.2124 31.61 10.37 28.74 53.36 6.91 5.77
9th Newman 0.2341 30.93 7.51 28.09 53.76 5.19 7.52
10th Emporia St. 0.2382 31.45 7.63 29.13 55.12 4.30 8.99
11th Mo. Southern St. 0.2980 36.23 6.44 32.70 47.75 3.76 8.46

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,584.2608 1,587.7709 1,589.6997 1,594.1384 1,588.9674
Difference 3.5101 5.4389 9.8776 6.2755

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Neb.-Kearney 38 561 309 61 43 55.08 9.2 13.0 419 154 35 43 63.25 12.0 9.7
Washburn 45 808 448 65 76 55.45 12.4 10.6 617 259 39 64 58.02 15.8 9.6
Central Okla. 43 760 412 59 50 54.21 12.9 15.2 640 276 35 66 56.88 18.3 9.7
Central Mo. 41 838 489 61 65 58.35 13.7 12.9 690 332 39 51 51.88 17.7 13.5
Missouri Western 42 706 409 89 85 57.93 7.9 8.3 688 367 61 75 46.66 11.3 9.2
Pittsburg St. 43 808 439 76 80 54.33 10.6 10.1 755 379 66 94 49.80 11.4 8.0
Northwest Mo. St. 42 707 363 74 112 51.34 9.6 6.3 639 310 39 79 51.49 16.4 8.1
Newman 32 561 279 39 44 49.73 14.4 12.8 558 269 49 62 51.79 11.4 9.0
Fort Hays St. 47 842 412 54 91 48.93 15.6 9.3 828 396 47 94 52.17 17.6 8.8
Mo. Southern St. 37 600 290 67 77 48.33 9.0 7.8 632 341 58 80 46.04 10.9 7.9
Emporia St. 39 583 262 47 49 44.94 12.4 11.9 738 399 56 70 45.94 13.2 10.5
Conference Average 41 707 374 63 70 52.60 11.6 10.7 655 317 48 71 52.17 14.2 9.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Mid-America Intercollegiate

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.24

2021-09-25
Central Mo.
Washburn
1
3
14
25
25
19
19
25
23
25
GAME

77.91

2021-09-25
Central Okla.
Neb.-Kearney
3
1
25
20
25
22
19
25
25
21
GAME

75.85

2021-09-25
Newman
Fort Hays St.
2
3
25
23
19
25
21
25
25
21
13
15
GAME

75.50

2021-09-17
Pittsburg St.
Central Okla.
3
0
27
25
25
23
27
25
GAME

74.02

2021-09-25
Northwest Mo. St.
Pittsburg St.
3
1
24
26
25
16
25
16
25
20
GAME

73.13

2021-09-18
Newman
Central Okla.
1
3
26
24
18
25
19
25
18
25
GAME

73.00

2021-09-24
Missouri Western
Pittsburg St.
3
1
20
25
25
21
25
22
25
23
GAME

71.78

2021-09-17
Northwest Mo. St.
Central Mo.
0
3
14
25
20
25
18
25
GAME

71.13

2021-09-14
Central Mo.
Missouri Western
3
0
25
15
25
14
25
20
GAME

70.84

2021-09-18
Fort Hays St.
Emporia St.
3
2
20
25
24
26
25
23
25
16
15
9

HuskerGeek Mid-America Intercollegiate All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 9.4143
2 8.5006
3 7.5900
4 7.4391
5 7.3688
6 7.2172
7 6.7269
8 6.6393
9 6.3781
10 6.2958

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 5.0468
2 5.0031
3 4.7734
4 4.6266
5 4.3812
6 3.8437
7 3.8095
8 3.6498
9 3.6323
10 3.6174

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 5.7245
2 5.2926
3 5.1621
4 4.9898
5 4.7891
6 4.6409
7 4.5442
8 4.1901
9 4.0891
10 3.7894

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.3766
2 0.2500
3 0.2374
4 0.2371
5 0.2306
6 0.2188
7 0.2187
8 0.2169
9 0.2165
10 0.2047

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1909
2 0.1826
3 0.1628
4 0.1471
5 0.1398
6 0.1328
7 0.1322
8 0.1292
9 0.1287
10 0.1253

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1916
2 0.1890
3 0.1856
4 0.1684
5 0.1665
6 0.1610
7 0.1455
8 0.1262
9 0.1232
10 0.1187


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek