Nerdly Nebraska.

2021-2022 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,694.2539
BPR D1 NCAAWBB South Carolina 0.7522

Football georgia 11.9075
Men's Basketball gonzaga 10.2479
Women's Basketball south carolina 11.7897
Baseball tennessee 9.4105
Softball oklahoma 13.5273
Ice Hockey minnesota st 8.3103
Men's Lacrosse maryland 11.6663
Women's Lacrosse north carolina 10.8325
Men's Soccer washington 9.3221
Women's Soccer florida st 10.8390
Men's Volleyball long beach st 10.0222
Women's Volleyball louisville 11.6893
Field Hockey iowa 10.0663

Mid-America Intercollegiate - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Neb.-Kearney 1,683.9296 1,688.9321 1,686.4290 60.07 66.09 0.245
2nd Washburn 1,681.7180 1,689.4190 1,685.5641 59.84 61.45 0.280
3rd Central Mo. 1,660.1697 1,670.9655 1,665.5588 62.59 59.25 0.249
4th Northwest Mo. St. 1,647.4863 1,654.8197 1,651.1489 60.46 58.34 0.226
5th Central Okla. 1,562.0099 1,573.4206 1,567.7049 58.08 57.49 0.140
6th Pittsburg St. 1,527.3710 1,539.0368 1,533.1928 58.69 53.17 0.116
7th Missouri Western 1,502.5327 1,513.6928 1,508.1024 56.76 52.09 0.109
8th Fort Hays St. 1,474.6887 1,482.5182 1,478.5983 52.21 52.81 0.074
9th Newman 1,463.7747 1,473.0050 1,468.3826 51.48 53.40 0.052
10th Emporia St. 1,393.5302 1,405.4913 1,399.4980 51.62 47.38 -0.017
11th Mo. Southern St. 1,348.3518 1,361.2309 1,354.7760 50.27 44.64 -0.060

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Washburn 0.3455 44.34 9.78 40.11 42.71 3.57 6.86
2nd Neb.-Kearney 0.3282 43.81 11.00 40.93 42.77 5.01 9.05
3rd Central Mo. 0.3169 41.07 9.37 37.57 46.73 3.53 8.54
4th Northwest Mo. St. 0.3128 42.66 11.38 39.06 43.89 4.14 9.61
5th Central Okla. 0.2677 37.46 10.69 33.99 49.68 3.89 6.38
6th Pittsburg St. 0.2664 40.47 13.82 37.15 45.11 3.68 9.74
7th Missouri Western 0.2406 36.03 11.97 33.37 51.86 4.12 7.82
8th Fort Hays St. 0.2190 35.52 13.62 33.07 51.49 5.06 6.47
9th Newman 0.2124 34.37 13.13 31.80 52.50 4.31 5.55
10th Emporia St. 0.1695 31.57 14.62 28.13 53.32 4.95 7.42
11th Mo. Southern St. 0.1528 32.18 16.90 29.32 53.67 4.68 9.33

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Washburn 0.0660 24.15 17.55 22.05 61.50 6.66 3.72
2nd Central Mo. 0.0680 25.00 18.20 23.11 59.66 6.70 3.49
3rd Neb.-Kearney 0.0834 26.44 18.10 24.96 59.80 6.35 4.11
4th Northwest Mo. St. 0.0865 24.53 15.88 22.42 61.86 5.07 4.67
5th Central Okla. 0.1273 27.75 15.03 25.95 58.53 4.89 3.87
6th Missouri Western 0.1313 29.04 15.91 26.44 56.22 4.68 5.70
7th Fort Hays St. 0.1454 30.90 16.36 27.82 54.15 6.22 4.25
8th Pittsburg St. 0.1506 30.85 15.79 28.11 54.78 4.25 5.29
9th Newman 0.1602 32.02 16.00 28.89 52.75 6.08 4.94
10th Emporia St. 0.1867 33.43 14.76 30.38 52.57 4.46 6.40
11th Mo. Southern St. 0.2126 35.88 14.61 32.98 49.24 4.52 8.05

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,545.3596 1,550.8612 1,553.2412 1,547.7494 1,549.3029
Difference 5.5016 7.8816 2.3898 5.2577

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Neb.-Kearney 109 1,855 1,044 184 119 56.28 10.1 15.6 1,404 558 101 117 60.26 13.9 12.0
Washburn 127 2,740 1,495 159 217 54.56 17.2 12.6 2,199 980 114 174 55.43 19.3 12.6
Central Mo. 120 2,565 1,449 181 163 56.49 14.2 15.7 2,123 991 112 131 53.32 19.0 16.2
Northwest Mo. St. 121 2,406 1,297 203 240 53.91 11.9 10.0 2,085 999 130 157 52.09 16.0 13.3
Central Okla. 102 1,932 1,036 108 121 53.62 17.9 16.0 1,797 860 95 174 52.14 18.9 10.3
Pittsburg St. 100 1,973 1,050 168 151 53.22 11.7 13.1 1,949 1,024 137 160 47.46 14.2 12.2
Missouri Western 110 2,074 1,086 155 193 52.36 13.4 10.7 2,175 1,159 152 172 46.71 14.3 12.6
Fort Hays St. 106 2,016 982 116 167 48.71 17.4 12.1 2,168 1,143 122 185 47.28 17.8 11.7
Newman 86 1,647 784 71 106 47.60 23.2 15.5 1,815 945 124 180 47.93 14.6 10.1
Emporia St. 97 1,683 774 113 127 45.99 14.9 13.3 2,100 1,192 150 159 43.24 14.0 13.2
Mo. Southern St. 101 1,664 781 145 191 46.94 11.5 8.7 2,150 1,286 198 180 40.19 10.9 11.9
Conference Average 107 2,050 1,071 146 163 51.79 14.8 13.0 1,997 1,012 130 163 49.64 15.7 12.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Mid-America Intercollegiate

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

82.66

2021-10-15
Northwest Mo. St.
Washburn
3
2
20
25
28
26
25
27
25
15
15
7
GAME

81.52

2021-10-08
Central Mo.
Neb.-Kearney
3
2
19
25
26
28
25
16
26
24
16
14
GAME

79.89

2021-10-26
Central Mo.
Northwest Mo. St.
3
2
25
22
22
25
25
20
25
27
15
9
GAME

79.56

2021-10-21
Washburn
Central Mo.
1
3
19
25
25
17
28
30
22
25
GAME

79.18

2021-10-09
Central Okla.
Northwest Mo. St.
2
3
25
18
13
25
25
20
26
28
10
15
GAME

78.88

2021-11-19 Warrensburg, MO
Northwest Mo. St.
Washburn
3
1
28
26
25
18
18
25
25
20
GAME

77.78

2021-12-02 Warrensburg, MO
Northwest Mo. St.
Neb.-Kearney
2
3
25
21
27
25
21
25
9
25
11
15
GAME

77.15

2021-11-20
Central Mo.
Northwest Mo. St.
3
2
13
25
20
25
25
20
25
18
15
10
GAME

77.03

2021-09-25
Central Okla.
Neb.-Kearney
3
1
25
20
25
22
19
25
25
21
GAME

76.68

2021-09-25
Central Mo.
Washburn
1
3
14
25
25
19
19
25
23
25

HuskerGeek Mid-America Intercollegiate All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.8667
2 20.9412
3 20.0578
4 19.2351
5 18.7231
6 18.4530
7 18.2056
8 17.9802
9 17.4753
10 17.2326

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.8122
2 14.1706
3 14.0831
4 13.1576
5 12.2960
6 11.5573
7 11.5251
8 11.3495
9 10.7047
10 10.4942

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.5876
2 16.2671
3 16.0398
4 16.0302
5 14.8458
6 14.5860
7 12.8109
8 11.5947
9 11.1165
10 10.7476

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2539
2 0.2248
3 0.2228
4 0.2104
5 0.2073
6 0.2060
7 0.1960
8 0.1910
9 0.1887
10 0.1850

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1520
2 0.1419
3 0.1400
4 0.1382
5 0.1277
6 0.1269
7 0.1198
8 0.1179
9 0.1156
10 0.1141

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1801
2 0.1741
3 0.1639
4 0.1535
5 0.1485
6 0.1458
7 0.1378
8 0.1372
9 0.1360
10 0.1318


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek