Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NACC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Concordia Wisconsin 1,583.1776 1,580.1746 1,581.6753 62.33 55.87 0.255
2nd Aurora 1,540.7622 1,536.5400 1,538.6496 59.63 57.44 0.212
3rd St. Norbert 1,484.8273 1,485.1856 1,485.0064 59.42 50.77 0.151
4th Edgewood 1,441.1837 1,439.6035 1,440.3934 55.16 50.15 0.112
5th Benedictine (IL) 1,425.4338 1,417.3562 1,421.3892 56.81 49.75 0.094
6th Wis. Lutheran 1,417.6225 1,412.2371 1,414.9272 53.95 49.01 0.085
7th MSOE 1,406.3348 1,401.5236 1,403.9271 54.41 47.90 0.080
8th IIT 1,397.3407 1,392.2326 1,394.7843 59.11 46.19 0.063
9th Dominican (IL) 1,389.5335 1,384.4426 1,386.9857 54.86 45.90 0.044
10th Concordia Chicago 1,369.2279 1,366.9773 1,368.1021 56.23 46.50 0.028
11th Lakeland 1,364.4250 1,366.1146 1,365.2695 56.62 41.19 0.037
12th Marian (WI) 1,349.0340 1,349.3226 1,349.1783 57.32 42.98 0.032
13th Rockford 1,215.4401 1,211.2701 1,213.3533 49.63 41.88 -0.120
14th Alverno 1,148.6082 1,148.9406 1,148.7744 44.75 41.68 -0.124

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Concordia Wisconsin 0.2969 41.72 12.04 38.77 45.43 2.90 11.80
2nd Aurora 0.2843 39.59 11.16 36.69 48.14 3.70 10.09
3rd Edgewood 0.2309 38.75 15.66 36.25 45.87 4.97 10.48
4th St. Norbert 0.2221 36.38 14.17 33.85 49.38 4.04 10.10
5th Dominican (IL) 0.2123 36.70 15.46 34.00 47.68 5.05 11.38
6th MSOE 0.2082 36.13 15.31 32.20 49.61 4.06 8.77
7th Benedictine (IL) 0.2024 35.59 15.34 33.19 51.47 4.00 10.83
8th Wis. Lutheran 0.1918 35.96 16.77 33.42 51.00 4.63 8.87
9th Concordia Chicago 0.1816 33.93 15.77 31.08 54.61 4.13 10.76
10th IIT 0.1770 32.87 15.17 29.89 54.16 3.65 10.05
11th Marian (WI) 0.1596 32.39 16.43 29.03 56.96 4.45 10.66
12th Lakeland 0.1539 31.81 16.42 29.31 53.84 4.64 11.56
13th Alverno 0.1462 30.54 15.92 28.34 59.24 3.58 7.83
14th Rockford 0.1197 27.69 15.72 25.61 61.11 4.26 10.37

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Concordia Wisconsin 0.0417 22.23 18.06 20.31 61.74 6.24 6.70
2nd St. Norbert 0.0713 24.01 16.88 22.27 62.25 5.12 6.32
3rd Aurora 0.0725 25.56 18.31 23.82 58.81 5.93 5.00
4th Wis. Lutheran 0.1071 27.19 16.48 25.24 57.33 4.79 6.88
5th Benedictine (IL) 0.1081 29.53 18.72 27.69 54.98 6.23 6.83
6th IIT 0.1141 28.33 16.92 25.55 54.66 4.32 8.01
7th Lakeland 0.1167 28.05 16.38 25.50 57.28 4.78 6.34
8th Edgewood 0.1190 28.80 16.90 26.65 56.43 5.23 7.26
9th Marian (WI) 0.1271 28.63 15.91 26.16 57.63 4.24 8.47
10th MSOE 0.1285 29.19 16.34 25.93 53.98 5.33 7.29
11th Concordia Chicago 0.1539 31.69 16.30 28.67 52.59 4.33 7.11
12th Dominican (IL) 0.1685 32.33 15.48 29.30 53.12 3.98 9.16
13th Rockford 0.2401 37.63 13.61 35.06 49.68 3.60 9.24
14th Alverno 0.2705 39.63 12.58 36.22 47.31 2.83 11.90

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,393.7440 1,398.4972 1,402.9963 1,399.4723 1,398.6775
Difference 4.7532 9.2523 5.7283 6.5779

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Concordia Wisconsin 97 2,163 1,261 215 194 58.30 10.1 11.1 1,745 848 148 161 51.40 11.8 10.8
Aurora 100 2,031 1,093 171 205 53.82 11.9 9.9 1,864 891 137 171 52.20 13.6 10.9
IIT 110 2,068 1,205 240 225 58.27 8.6 9.2 2,056 1,162 203 230 43.48 10.1 8.9
St. Norbert 119 2,345 1,298 211 226 55.35 11.1 10.4 2,214 1,188 192 242 46.34 11.5 9.1
Benedictine (IL) 106 1,965 1,078 217 248 54.86 9.1 7.9 1,919 1,029 199 229 46.38 9.6 8.4
Concordia Chicago 105 1,671 928 231 205 55.54 7.2 8.2 1,698 933 184 197 45.05 9.2 8.6
Edgewood 113 2,026 1,061 215 263 52.37 9.4 7.7 1,956 1,027 207 268 47.50 9.4 7.3
MSOE 113 1,800 961 198 239 53.39 9.1 7.5 1,783 960 206 253 46.16 8.7 7.0
Marian (WI) 103 1,022 586 198 262 57.34 5.2 3.9 1,051 618 177 171 41.20 5.9 6.1
Wis. Lutheran 95 1,452 735 138 219 50.62 10.5 6.6 1,540 844 163 180 45.20 9.4 8.6
Dominican (IL) 96 1,668 862 193 205 51.68 8.6 8.1 1,864 1,071 222 235 42.54 8.4 7.9
Rockford 100 1,523 783 190 188 51.41 8.0 8.1 1,796 1,049 226 225 41.59 7.9 8.0
Lakeland 83 925 474 152 177 51.24 6.1 5.2 1,137 722 143 164 36.50 8.0 6.9
Alverno 59 643 286 78 168 44.48 8.2 3.8 930 563 184 108 39.46 5.1 8.6
Conference Average 100 1,664 901 189 216 53.48 8.8 7.7 1,682 922 185 202 44.64 9.2 8.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NACC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.40

2021-10-09
Concordia Wisconsin
Aurora
3
2
23
25
25
12
25
18
22
25
15
11
GAME

73.93

2021-11-06
Aurora
Concordia Wisconsin
3
1
25
20
25
23
19
25
25
22
GAME

71.46

2021-09-15
Edgewood
Concordia Wisconsin
3
2
15
25
25
23
26
24
16
25
17
15
GAME

69.93

2021-10-02
Aurora
St. Norbert
3
1
25
22
22
25
27
25
25
16
GAME

69.54

2021-09-21 Fond du Lac, Wis.
Marian (WI)
Edgewood
1
3
26
24
20
25
14
25
23
25
GAME

69.41

2021-10-23
Wis. Lutheran
Aurora
1
3
14
25
24
26
25
23
16
25
GAME

69.13

2021-10-23
St. Norbert
Concordia Wisconsin
3
1
25
22
17
25
25
19
25
18
GAME

68.56

2021-10-15
Benedictine (IL)
Concordia Wisconsin
1
3
13
25
28
26
10
25
20
25
GAME

68.26

2021-11-02
Benedictine (IL)
IIT
2
3
25
19
23
25
17
25
25
17
11
15
GAME

66.83

2021-10-16
Concordia Chicago
Wis. Lutheran
2
3
25
15
22
25
25
15
26
28
16
18

HuskerGeek NACC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 19.6237
2 19.4162
3 17.3734
4 17.2036
5 16.6705
6 16.4117
7 15.3420
8 15.3171
9 14.5336
10 14.5211

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.4062
2 10.0494
3 10.0066
4 8.8100
5 8.2048
6 8.1908
7 8.0493
8 7.7684
9 7.7138
10 7.1093

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.0880
2 15.1439
3 13.2538
4 11.4632
5 11.0334
6 10.9293
7 10.6336
8 10.3702
9 9.8408
10 9.4899

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2232
2 0.2070
3 0.2044
4 0.1992
5 0.1913
6 0.1870
7 0.1850
8 0.1848
9 0.1778
10 0.1773

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1300
2 0.1191
3 0.1155
4 0.1107
5 0.1095
6 0.1094
7 0.1092
8 0.0947
9 0.0892
10 0.0856

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1884
2 0.1669
3 0.1611
4 0.1477
5 0.1441
6 0.1381
7 0.1313
8 0.1313
9 0.1301
10 0.1219


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek