Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wittenberg 1,548.9155 1,509.5145 1,529.0881 58.13 61.79 0.197
2nd DePauw 1,492.8599 1,460.7756 1,476.7306 59.68 56.60 0.186
3rd Hiram 1,463.9945 1,429.0804 1,446.4321 55.90 59.07 0.133
4th Denison 1,450.3620 1,411.5119 1,430.8051 57.12 54.99 0.115
5th Ohio Wesleyan 1,446.6898 1,402.3584 1,424.3516 51.77 59.09 0.128
6th Kenyon 1,370.7270 1,334.8388 1,352.6639 50.67 52.65 0.058
7th Wooster 1,338.1064 1,303.6363 1,320.7589 49.72 51.97 0.054
8th Oberlin 1,306.9179 1,274.4202 1,290.5668 48.25 49.62 0.016
9th Allegheny 1,247.7668 1,215.0952 1,231.3227 50.59 44.72 -0.062

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st DePauw 0.2594 37.98 12.05 34.82 49.61 3.37 9.22
2nd Wittenberg 0.2495 38.09 13.14 35.40 46.67 4.14 10.08
3rd Ohio Wesleyan 0.2330 37.66 14.36 34.87 48.26 3.21 12.95
4th Denison 0.2299 35.16 12.17 31.94 53.34 3.40 12.14
5th Hiram 0.2230 35.76 13.47 33.60 51.77 3.27 11.52
6th Kenyon 0.2142 34.80 13.38 31.92 52.26 4.33 10.57
7th Wooster 0.2040 34.41 14.01 31.57 51.24 4.25 9.82
8th Oberlin 0.1862 33.89 15.27 31.86 54.82 3.72 8.45
9th Allegheny 0.1234 28.25 15.91 25.86 58.67 3.81 7.98

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wittenberg 0.0523 22.23 17.00 20.33 64.37 5.13 4.59
2nd DePauw 0.0730 24.13 16.83 22.82 62.89 4.67 7.62
3rd Hiram 0.0904 25.60 16.56 23.72 62.12 4.34 4.62
4th Ohio Wesleyan 0.1052 28.63 18.11 26.78 56.04 5.53 8.66
5th Denison 0.1144 27.98 16.54 26.35 57.14 5.17 7.73
6th Wooster 0.1496 28.81 13.85 25.83 57.71 2.88 9.34
7th Kenyon 0.1567 31.27 15.60 28.52 53.59 5.31 8.24
8th Oberlin 0.1704 32.80 15.76 29.71 54.78 4.18 8.09
9th Allegheny 0.1857 32.55 13.99 30.18 53.00 3.71 9.47

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,389.1911 1,391.7584 1,395.0023 1,402.6069 1,394.6397
Difference 2.5673 5.8112 13.4158 7.2648

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
DePauw 99 1,942 1,142 156 144 58.81 12.4 13.5 1,623 817 168 169 49.66 9.7 9.6
Denison 76 1,606 887 188 131 55.23 8.5 12.3 1,485 746 132 150 49.76 11.3 9.9
Wittenberg 89 1,753 894 130 169 51.00 13.5 10.4 1,631 769 108 167 52.85 15.1 9.8
Hiram 108 2,003 1,013 224 204 50.57 8.9 9.8 1,897 899 122 185 52.61 15.5 10.3
Ohio Wesleyan 109 2,081 970 252 270 46.61 8.3 7.7 2,111 1,011 226 189 52.11 9.3 11.2
Wooster 95 1,824 884 169 232 48.47 10.8 7.9 1,967 1,034 200 158 47.43 9.8 12.4
Oberlin 85 1,297 635 133 199 48.96 9.8 6.5 1,387 756 149 124 45.49 9.3 11.2
Kenyon 95 1,734 813 161 169 46.89 10.8 10.3 1,923 1,011 196 151 47.43 9.8 12.7
Allegheny 91 1,549 806 132 144 52.03 11.7 10.8 1,748 1,016 197 199 41.88 8.9 8.8
Conference Average 94 1,754 894 172 185 50.95 10.5 9.9 1,752 895 166 166 48.80 11.0 10.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.56

2019-10-08 Delaware, Ohio, USA
Ohio Wesleyan
Denison
2
3
27
25
26
28
25
19
23
25
13
15
GAME

67.54

2019-10-22
DePauw
Wittenberg
0
3
21
25
20
25
24
26
GAME

67.37

2019-10-02
DePauw
Denison
0
3
24
26
24
26
23
25
GAME

66.02

2019-10-29 Springfield, OH
Wittenberg
Denison
3
0
25
17
25
19
25
14
GAME

65.76

2019-09-27 Hiram, Ohio
Hiram
Wittenberg
0
3
18
25
13
25
29
31
GAME

65.40

2019-10-26 Delaware, Ohio, USA
Ohio Wesleyan
DePauw
3
0
25
21
25
19
25
23
GAME

65.40

2019-10-17
Kenyon
DePauw
0
3
15
25
21
25
28
30
GAME

65.06

2019-10-12 Wooster, Ohio
Wooster
Denison
3
1
18
25
25
23
25
21
25
21
GAME

64.96

2019-09-28 Hiram, Ohio
Hiram
DePauw
0
3
18
25
22
25
16
25
GAME

64.84

2019-10-12 Delaware, Ohio, USA
Ohio Wesleyan
Hiram
3
2
11
25
25
16
19
25
25
23
15
7

HuskerGeek NCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 18.3213
2 15.8751
3 15.4266
4 15.2958
5 14.9681
6 14.6221
7 13.6932
8 13.6040
9 13.4506
10 13.3111

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.5535
2 10.5223
3 9.6285
4 9.4354
5 9.2615
6 7.7714
7 7.6744
8 7.5787
9 7.2728
10 6.6655

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.6388
2 13.5353
3 12.0086
4 11.7863
5 11.7528
6 10.5161
7 10.0974
8 9.0615
9 8.9973
10 8.7309

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2349
2 0.2095
3 0.2089
4 0.2038
5 0.1987
6 0.1955
7 0.1765
8 0.1733
9 0.1707
10 0.1680

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1382
2 0.1353
3 0.1348
4 0.1131
5 0.1102
6 0.1035
7 0.0934
8 0.0913
9 0.0903
10 0.0861

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1713
2 0.1683
3 0.1560
4 0.1557
5 0.1507
6 0.1339
7 0.1182
8 0.1139
9 0.1131
10 0.1101


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek