Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Ohio Wesleyan 1,453.9672 1,450.6431 1,452.3042 36.00 47.62 -0.039
2nd Wittenberg 1,450.1848 1,447.5341 1,448.8588 40.09 35.42 -0.046
3rd Denison 1,367.1760 1,364.0129 1,365.5936 35.44 34.41 -0.126
4th Hiram 1,329.3547 1,326.7795 1,328.0665 34.72 36.36 -0.171
5th DePauw 1,261.8501 1,258.8693 1,260.3588 32.38 32.69 -0.253
6th Wooster 1,206.4733 1,203.3706 1,204.9210 36.90 27.36 -0.209
7th Kenyon 1,105.4615 1,102.5293 1,103.9944 31.32 19.88 -0.395

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Ohio Wesleyan 0.2591 35.53 9.62 30.39 45.33 5.98 9.80
2nd Hiram 0.2202 37.15 15.13 33.54 41.15 8.38 8.28
3rd Denison 0.1951 32.01 12.49 28.89 47.88 7.36 7.92
4th Wittenberg 0.1720 32.08 14.88 29.07 45.24 6.16 9.00
5th DePauw 0.1413 26.12 11.99 23.57 54.31 6.07 8.28
6th Wooster 0.1363 27.91 14.27 23.16 52.49 6.63 10.47
7th Kenyon 0.0553 24.07 18.54 20.56 53.91 7.53 8.26

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wittenberg 0.2182 27.25 5.44 26.97 64.60 4.46 5.84
2nd Ohio Wesleyan 0.2979 30.13 0.34 28.23 63.86 2.08 4.41
3rd Denison 0.3215 33.03 0.89 32.71 57.01 3.29 2.68
4th Wooster 0.3450 35.96 1.46 33.77 52.98 1.36 9.88
5th Hiram 0.3916 40.10 0.94 37.47 50.13 1.62 3.04
6th DePauw 0.3947 39.19 -0.27 37.69 50.60 1.86 7.54
7th Kenyon 0.4499 45.48 0.49 42.43 48.04 3.85 8.08

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,309.1568 1,321.5597 1,318.0063 1,328.0665 1,319.1973
Difference 12.4030 8.8495 18.9097 13.3874

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Ohio Wesleyan 27 432 234 54 69 54.17 8.0 6.3 336 135 36 51 59.82 9.3 6.6
Wittenberg 27 518 276 38 52 53.28 13.6 10.0 461 230 40 62 50.11 11.5 7.4
Denison 25 345 188 44 36 54.49 7.8 9.6 335 182 27 50 45.67 12.4 6.7
DePauw 25 441 228 43 39 51.70 10.3 11.3 451 241 45 52 46.56 10.0 8.7
Hiram 10 190 90 16 18 47.37 11.9 10.6 220 119 11 24 45.91 20.0 9.2
Wooster 18 319 151 21 44 47.34 15.2 7.3 424 247 48 28 41.75 8.8 15.1
Kenyon 7 113 54 9 18 47.79 12.6 6.3 170 112 16 10 34.12 10.6 17.0
Conference Average 20 337 174 32 39 50.88 11.3 8.7 342 181 32 40 46.28 11.8 10.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

66.94

2021-04-09
Wittenberg
Denison
3
2
25
19
25
22
24
26
21
25
16
14
GAME

66.49

2021-03-27 Delaware, Ohio, USA
Ohio Wesleyan
Wittenberg
3
1
21
25
28
26
25
22
25
11
GAME

66.27

2021-03-27 Delaware, Ohio, USA
Ohio Wesleyan
Wittenberg
3
1
25
11
24
26
25
19
25
21
GAME

62.64

2021-03-20 Delaware, Ohio, USA
Ohio Wesleyan
DePauw
3
0
25
22
25
11
25
19
GAME

60.17

2021-04-09
Wittenberg
Denison
3
0
25
23
25
18
25
9
GAME

59.79

2021-04-17
Wittenberg
Hiram
3
1
25
13
23
25
25
15
25
16
GAME

57.97

2021-03-27
Denison
Wooster
3
1
25
17
25
12
21
25
25
16
GAME

56.80

2021-03-27
Denison
Wooster
3
1
25
17
25
17
19
25
25
19
GAME

56.58

2021-03-13
Wooster
Ohio Wesleyan
0
3
19
25
10
25
15
25
GAME

56.13

2021-03-13
Wooster
Ohio Wesleyan
1
3
12
25
25
16
16
25
19
25

HuskerGeek NCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
D
D

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 4.5186
2 3.8754
3 3.5282
4 3.4795
5 3.4282
6 3.2883
7 3.0110
8 3.0058
9 2.8851
10 2.6916

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 3.0196
2 2.1904
3 2.0832
4 1.8687
5 1.7760
6 1.4820
7 1.2339
8 1.2207
9 1.1920
10 1.1912

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 3.0487
2 2.8290
3 2.6743
4 2.4437
5 2.3660
6 2.2361
7 2.0496
8 1.9574
9 1.9513
10 1.6850

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2153
2 0.2152
3 0.1960
4 0.1923
5 0.1827
6 0.1753
7 0.1714
8 0.1657
9 0.1495
10 0.1431

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1438
2 0.1217
3 0.1157
4 0.1011
5 0.0988
6 0.0890
7 0.0887
8 0.0814
9 0.0772
10 0.0745

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1572
2 0.1452
3 0.1337
4 0.1139
5 0.1127
6 0.1118
7 0.1084
8 0.1062
9 0.0979
10 0.0973


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek