Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Ohio Wesleyan | 1,453.9672 | 1,450.6431 | 1,452.3042 | 36.00 | 47.62 | -0.039 |
2nd | Wittenberg | 1,450.1848 | 1,447.5341 | 1,448.8588 | 40.09 | 35.42 | -0.046 |
3rd | Denison | 1,367.1760 | 1,364.0129 | 1,365.5936 | 35.44 | 34.41 | -0.126 |
4th | Hiram | 1,329.3547 | 1,326.7795 | 1,328.0665 | 34.72 | 36.36 | -0.171 |
5th | DePauw | 1,261.8501 | 1,258.8693 | 1,260.3588 | 32.38 | 32.69 | -0.253 |
6th | Wooster | 1,206.4733 | 1,203.3706 | 1,204.9210 | 36.90 | 27.36 | -0.209 |
7th | Kenyon | 1,105.4615 | 1,102.5293 | 1,103.9944 | 31.32 | 19.88 | -0.395 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.2591 | 35.53 | 9.62 | 30.39 | 45.33 | 5.98 | 9.80 |
2nd | Hiram | 0.2202 | 37.15 | 15.13 | 33.54 | 41.15 | 8.38 | 8.28 |
3rd | Denison | 0.1951 | 32.01 | 12.49 | 28.89 | 47.88 | 7.36 | 7.92 |
4th | Wittenberg | 0.1720 | 32.08 | 14.88 | 29.07 | 45.24 | 6.16 | 9.00 |
5th | DePauw | 0.1413 | 26.12 | 11.99 | 23.57 | 54.31 | 6.07 | 8.28 |
6th | Wooster | 0.1363 | 27.91 | 14.27 | 23.16 | 52.49 | 6.63 | 10.47 |
7th | Kenyon | 0.0553 | 24.07 | 18.54 | 20.56 | 53.91 | 7.53 | 8.26 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Wittenberg | 0.2182 | 27.25 | 5.44 | 26.97 | 64.60 | 4.46 | 5.84 |
2nd | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.2979 | 30.13 | 0.34 | 28.23 | 63.86 | 2.08 | 4.41 |
3rd | Denison | 0.3215 | 33.03 | 0.89 | 32.71 | 57.01 | 3.29 | 2.68 |
4th | Wooster | 0.3450 | 35.96 | 1.46 | 33.77 | 52.98 | 1.36 | 9.88 |
5th | Hiram | 0.3916 | 40.10 | 0.94 | 37.47 | 50.13 | 1.62 | 3.04 |
6th | DePauw | 0.3947 | 39.19 | -0.27 | 37.69 | 50.60 | 1.86 | 7.54 |
7th | Kenyon | 0.4499 | 45.48 | 0.49 | 42.43 | 48.04 | 3.85 | 8.08 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,309.1568 | 1,321.5597 | 1,318.0063 | 1,328.0665 | 1,319.1973 |
Difference | 12.4030 | 8.8495 | 18.9097 | 13.3874 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Ohio Wesleyan | 27 | 432 | 234 | 54 | 69 | 54.17 | 8.0 | 6.3 | 336 | 135 | 36 | 51 | 59.82 | 9.3 | 6.6 |
Wittenberg | 27 | 518 | 276 | 38 | 52 | 53.28 | 13.6 | 10.0 | 461 | 230 | 40 | 62 | 50.11 | 11.5 | 7.4 |
Denison | 25 | 345 | 188 | 44 | 36 | 54.49 | 7.8 | 9.6 | 335 | 182 | 27 | 50 | 45.67 | 12.4 | 6.7 |
DePauw | 25 | 441 | 228 | 43 | 39 | 51.70 | 10.3 | 11.3 | 451 | 241 | 45 | 52 | 46.56 | 10.0 | 8.7 |
Hiram | 10 | 190 | 90 | 16 | 18 | 47.37 | 11.9 | 10.6 | 220 | 119 | 11 | 24 | 45.91 | 20.0 | 9.2 |
Wooster | 18 | 319 | 151 | 21 | 44 | 47.34 | 15.2 | 7.3 | 424 | 247 | 48 | 28 | 41.75 | 8.8 | 15.1 |
Kenyon | 7 | 113 | 54 | 9 | 18 | 47.79 | 12.6 | 6.3 | 170 | 112 | 16 | 10 | 34.12 | 10.6 | 17.0 |
Conference Average | 20 | 337 | 174 | 32 | 39 | 50.88 | 11.3 | 8.7 | 342 | 181 | 32 | 40 | 46.28 | 11.8 | 10.1 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
66.94 |
2021-04-09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
66.49 |
2021-03-27 | Delaware, Ohio, USA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
66.27 |
2021-03-27 | Delaware, Ohio, USA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
62.64 |
2021-03-20 | Delaware, Ohio, USA |
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
60.17 |
2021-04-09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
GAME |
59.79 |
2021-04-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
57.97 |
2021-03-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
56.80 |
2021-03-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GAME |
56.58 |
2021-03-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
GAME |
56.13 |
2021-03-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Sarah Hettich | Wittenberg | A |
Elise Monroe | DePauw | A |
Eliza Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan | A |
Abbie Staggs | DePauw | A |
Meghan Schwallie | Ohio Wesleyan | D |
Grace Filbrun | DePauw | S |
Molly Jewett | Ohio Wesleyan | S |
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Erin Bitzer | Ohio Wesleyan | A |
Sarah Herman | DePauw | A |
Amelia Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan | A |
Jessica Levy | DePauw | D |
Kaitlyn Peters | Ohio Wesleyan | D |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Grace Filbrun | DePauw |
2 | Eliza Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan |
3 | Molly Jewett | Ohio Wesleyan |
4 | Meghan Schwallie | Ohio Wesleyan |
5 | Jessica Levy | DePauw |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Eliza Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan |
2 | Elise Monroe | DePauw |
3 | Abbie Staggs | DePauw |
4 | Sarah Hettich | Wittenberg |
5 | Amelia Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Grace Filbrun | DePauw |
2 | Molly Jewett | Ohio Wesleyan |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Meghan Schwallie | Ohio Wesleyan |
2 | Jessica Levy | DePauw |
3 | Kaitlyn Peters | Ohio Wesleyan |
4 | Jenna Purichia | DePauw |
5 | Dakota White | Wittenberg |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Grace Filbrun | DePauw | 4.5186 |
2 | Eliza Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan | 3.8754 |
3 | Molly Jewett | Ohio Wesleyan | 3.5282 |
4 | Jessica Levy | DePauw | 3.4795 |
5 | Katie Hiestand | Wittenberg | 3.4282 |
6 | Meghan Schwallie | Ohio Wesleyan | 3.2883 |
7 | Mack Ricketts | Wittenberg | 3.0110 |
8 | Jenna Purichia | DePauw | 3.0058 |
9 | Hayley Nash | Wooster | 2.8851 |
10 | Kaitlyn Peters | Ohio Wesleyan | 2.6916 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Grace Filbrun | DePauw | 3.0196 |
2 | Eliza Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan | 2.1904 |
3 | Molly Jewett | Ohio Wesleyan | 2.0832 |
4 | Elise Monroe | DePauw | 1.8687 |
5 | Mack Ricketts | Wittenberg | 1.7760 |
6 | Hayley Nash | Wooster | 1.4820 |
7 | Abbie Staggs | DePauw | 1.2339 |
8 | Lucy Anderson | Denison | 1.2207 |
9 | Katie Hiestand | Wittenberg | 1.1920 |
10 | Amelia Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan | 1.1912 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jenna Purichia | DePauw | 3.0487 |
2 | Meghan Schwallie | Ohio Wesleyan | 2.8290 |
3 | Nicole Belanger | Wittenberg | 2.6743 |
4 | Dakota White | Wittenberg | 2.4437 |
5 | Jessica Levy | DePauw | 2.3660 |
6 | Katie Hiestand | Wittenberg | 2.2361 |
7 | Kaitlyn Peters | Ohio Wesleyan | 2.0496 |
8 | Lexi Carr | DePauw | 1.9574 |
9 | Chloe Merritt | Ohio Wesleyan | 1.9513 |
10 | Eliza Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan | 1.6850 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eliza Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.2153 |
2 | Grace Filbrun | DePauw | 0.2152 |
3 | Molly Jewett | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.1960 |
4 | Hayley Nash | Wooster | 0.1923 |
5 | Meghan Schwallie | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.1827 |
6 | Sophie Tight | Denison | 0.1753 |
7 | Katie Hiestand | Wittenberg | 0.1714 |
8 | Jessica Levy | DePauw | 0.1657 |
9 | Kaitlyn Peters | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.1495 |
10 | Jenna Purichia | DePauw | 0.1431 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Grace Filbrun | DePauw | 0.1438 |
2 | Eliza Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.1217 |
3 | Molly Jewett | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.1157 |
4 | Sophie Tight | Denison | 0.1011 |
5 | Hayley Nash | Wooster | 0.0988 |
6 | Elise Monroe | DePauw | 0.0890 |
7 | Melissa Murray | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.0887 |
8 | Lucy Anderson | Denison | 0.0814 |
9 | Mack Ricketts | Wittenberg | 0.0772 |
10 | Amelia Richardson | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.0745 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Meghan Schwallie | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.1572 |
2 | Jenna Purichia | DePauw | 0.1452 |
3 | Nicole Belanger | Wittenberg | 0.1337 |
4 | Kaitlyn Peters | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.1139 |
5 | Jessica Levy | DePauw | 0.1127 |
6 | Katie Hiestand | Wittenberg | 0.1118 |
7 | Chloe Merritt | Ohio Wesleyan | 0.1084 |
8 | Dakota White | Wittenberg | 0.1062 |
9 | Lexi Carr | DePauw | 0.0979 |
10 | Emma Woerner | Denison | 0.0973 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.