Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NE10 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Bentley 1,475.4319 1,440.2016 1,457.7103 50.04 49.74 0.028
2nd New Haven 1,473.4424 1,441.1127 1,457.1879 50.92 49.65 0.019
3rd St. Anselm 1,458.0433 1,420.2453 1,439.0202 48.15 49.98 -0.003
4th American Int'l 1,449.6775 1,411.3480 1,430.3844 42.80 38.03 -0.012
5th Stonehill 1,421.4724 1,384.5716 1,402.9007 46.50 46.86 -0.038
6th Adelphi 1,407.2649 1,375.2726 1,391.1768 44.25 52.17 -0.019
7th Franklin Pierce 1,401.8023 1,362.3797 1,381.9504 44.40 46.90 -0.083
8th Southern N.H. 1,389.4430 1,359.0151 1,374.1448 44.87 48.19 -0.068
9th Le Moyne 1,389.2542 1,351.7945 1,370.3964 44.91 46.39 -0.091
10th Southern Conn. St. 1,383.9959 1,340.5997 1,362.1249 45.11 49.61 -0.069
11th Saint Rose 1,357.4968 1,322.1102 1,339.6867 45.00 42.60 -0.094
12th Pace 1,331.5872 1,294.1844 1,312.7526 40.35 46.04 -0.143
13th Assumption 1,268.3389 1,239.7777 1,253.9770 45.55 37.22 -0.179
14th Saint Michael's 1,116.6171 1,076.4806 1,096.3652 18.13 20.49 -0.350

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st St. Anselm 0.2047 34.52 14.05 31.86 50.00 5.88 8.31
2nd Bentley 0.1981 33.21 13.40 31.18 52.30 5.02 6.31
3rd New Haven 0.1861 30.87 12.26 28.75 55.71 5.09 7.93
4th American Int'l 0.1786 32.61 14.76 30.29 50.89 6.62 9.65
5th Adelphi 0.1619 32.60 16.41 30.54 53.83 4.62 7.76
6th Franklin Pierce 0.1552 30.43 14.91 28.47 54.41 5.79 6.96
7th Le Moyne 0.1503 30.62 15.59 28.42 53.51 5.87 7.08
8th Stonehill 0.1488 32.74 17.86 30.71 49.70 6.65 6.91
9th Southern N.H. 0.1441 29.82 15.41 27.12 53.44 5.37 7.89
10th Southern Conn. St. 0.1411 29.06 14.95 27.19 55.22 4.77 7.60
11th Saint Rose 0.1217 28.39 16.21 26.81 55.62 5.46 7.13
12th Pace 0.1151 28.81 17.30 26.77 53.53 5.39 7.45
13th Assumption 0.0675 23.81 17.07 22.44 60.86 4.92 7.43
14th Saint Michael's 0.0260 22.36 19.76 20.64 61.08 8.81 14.44

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st New Haven 0.1670 31.28 14.58 28.25 56.34 3.80 7.62
2nd Bentley 0.1697 32.27 15.30 30.36 54.25 4.32 7.62
3rd Adelphi 0.1806 34.08 16.02 31.84 52.64 5.17 7.70
4th Stonehill 0.1872 34.60 15.87 31.60 52.86 4.12 7.05
5th American Int'l 0.1906 33.05 13.99 30.29 54.79 3.66 5.71
6th St. Anselm 0.2078 34.74 13.96 32.14 52.22 3.26 9.40
7th Southern Conn. St. 0.2102 34.18 13.17 31.75 52.71 3.18 8.65
8th Southern N.H. 0.2116 35.28 14.12 32.19 50.02 3.66 5.99
9th Saint Rose 0.2156 36.06 14.50 33.12 48.37 5.01 9.47
10th Franklin Pierce 0.2382 37.05 13.23 34.75 50.03 3.62 8.48
11th Le Moyne 0.2415 38.06 13.90 34.99 48.71 3.37 8.81
12th Assumption 0.2469 38.88 14.19 35.32 46.32 4.45 9.30
13th Pace 0.2582 38.52 12.70 34.39 49.01 3.09 8.23
14th Saint Michael's 0.3760 47.58 9.97 44.01 41.74 1.76 10.17

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,362.1270 1,376.3086 1,380.4538 1,381.5956 1,375.1212
Difference 14.1815 18.3268 19.4686 17.3256

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Bentley 115 2,571 1,475 185 218 57.37 13.9 11.8 2,226 1,088 187 204 51.12 11.9 10.9
New Haven 105 2,388 1,349 204 194 56.49 11.7 12.3 2,107 1,053 166 167 50.02 12.7 12.6
Southern Conn. St. 110 2,470 1,325 212 243 53.64 11.7 10.2 2,276 1,098 197 193 51.76 11.6 11.8
St. Anselm 128 2,705 1,486 249 265 54.94 10.9 10.2 2,497 1,238 250 252 50.42 10.0 9.9
Adelphi 96 2,171 1,095 192 311 50.44 11.3 7.0 2,010 922 155 183 54.13 13.0 11.0
Stonehill 99 2,261 1,219 176 229 53.91 12.8 9.9 2,087 1,055 152 219 49.45 13.7 9.5
Franklin Pierce 100 2,227 1,186 183 109 53.26 12.2 20.4 2,090 1,057 184 204 49.43 11.4 10.2
Le Moyne 101 2,121 1,096 183 153 51.67 11.6 13.9 2,092 1,058 186 217 49.43 11.2 9.6
Southern N.H. 101 1,938 998 190 170 51.50 10.2 11.4 1,904 960 141 218 49.58 13.5 8.7
Saint Rose 102 2,057 1,060 168 124 51.53 12.2 16.6 2,168 1,196 213 209 44.83 10.2 10.4
Pace 97 1,960 934 157 148 47.65 12.5 13.2 2,162 1,141 182 192 47.23 11.9 11.3
Assumption 83 1,611 871 132 155 54.07 12.2 10.4 1,892 1,148 182 191 39.32 10.4 9.9
American Int'l 120 1,750 858 194 288 49.03 9.0 6.1 3,113 2,433 192 202 21.84 16.2 15.4
Saint Michael's 63 420 110 78 97 26.19 5.4 4.3 1,955 1,833 203 124 6.24 9.6 15.8
Conference Average 101 2,046 1,076 179 193 50.83 11.3 11.3 2,184 1,234 185 198 43.91 11.9 11.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NE10

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.31

2019-09-24
American Int'l
New Haven
1
3
19
26
26
24
23
25
25
27
GAME

70.46

2019-10-26
Le Moyne
Bentley
2
3
27
25
21
25
25
16
13
25
15
17
GAME

69.47

2019-11-19
St. Anselm
New Haven
3
2
25
13
23
25
23
25
26
24
15
10
GAME

69.20

2019-11-09 Pleasantville, N.Y.
Pace
Franklin Pierce
2
3
29
31
25
21
25
21
20
25
10
15
GAME

69.00

2019-10-01
St. Anselm
Bentley
2
3
21
25
25
27
25
23
25
16
12
15
GAME

68.90

2019-11-09
American Int'l
Bentley
3
1
25
23
19
25
25
23
25
13
GAME

68.81

2019-10-12
New Haven
Le Moyne
2
3
25
13
23
25
15
25
25
12
14
16
GAME

68.72

2019-11-22
Bentley
St. Anselm
3
2
25
16
17
25
22
25
25
17
15
13
GAME

68.70

2019-09-20
American Int'l
St. Anselm
1
3
21
25
27
25
20
25
22
25
GAME

68.60

2019-10-22
American Int'l
Franklin Pierce
3
2
23
25
25
20
18
25
25
20
15
11

HuskerGeek NE10 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.3001
2 21.8388
3 20.3603
4 20.2870
5 20.1555
6 19.9530
7 18.0883
8 17.9935
9 17.9435
10 16.9430

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.1679
2 12.7447
3 12.5481
4 12.0738
5 11.9943
6 10.4610
7 10.3543
8 10.2484
9 9.6349
10 9.4848

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.1928
2 16.1350
3 16.0334
4 16.0021
5 15.3264
6 15.0368
7 14.5633
8 13.8189
9 12.5090
10 12.3056

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2184
2 0.2181
3 0.1936
4 0.1922
5 0.1920
6 0.1900
7 0.1884
8 0.1799
9 0.1794
10 0.1753

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1417
2 0.1370
3 0.1220
4 0.1164
5 0.1120
6 0.1082
7 0.1015
8 0.0993
9 0.0986
10 0.0951

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1791
2 0.1613
3 0.1600
4 0.1566
5 0.1527
6 0.1421
7 0.1367
8 0.1314
9 0.1288
10 0.1269


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek