Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NEC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st LIU Brooklyn 1,448.1476 1,427.0098 1,437.5399 41.18 55.38 -0.046
2nd Bryant 1,425.6969 1,402.5267 1,414.0643 39.38 55.71 -0.070
3rd Sacred Heart 1,427.0450 1,401.1157 1,414.0209 39.22 54.09 -0.070
4th Central Conn. St. 1,411.8444 1,400.6565 1,406.2393 39.91 53.83 -0.053
5th Robert Morris 1,375.3743 1,357.8232 1,366.5706 37.93 51.39 -0.091
6th Saint Francis (PA) 1,355.7097 1,337.6851 1,346.6672 36.73 50.41 -0.132
7th St. Francis Brooklyn 1,326.4570 1,309.0863 1,317.7430 34.88 49.29 -0.153
8th Fairleigh Dickinson 1,245.7245 1,219.3375 1,232.4604 31.30 43.25 -0.249

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Central Conn. St. 0.1618 31.06 14.88 29.49 54.41 6.81 5.69
2nd Robert Morris 0.1585 31.93 16.09 29.74 53.72 6.53 6.38
3rd LIU Brooklyn 0.1577 32.77 17.00 31.14 52.35 7.60 4.31
4th Sacred Heart 0.1574 34.10 18.37 31.48 48.31 8.55 5.75
5th Bryant 0.1541 33.61 18.19 31.62 49.54 7.66 4.69
6th St. Francis Brooklyn 0.1326 31.30 18.04 28.83 53.24 7.38 5.80
7th Saint Francis (PA) 0.1249 29.56 17.07 27.76 57.01 6.93 4.19
8th Fairleigh Dickinson 0.0585 23.64 17.78 22.30 63.06 5.86 3.61

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st LIU Brooklyn 0.2038 35.55 15.17 33.13 50.14 5.35 5.81
2nd Central Conn. St. 0.2144 37.86 16.42 35.82 46.62 6.13 6.53
3rd Bryant 0.2245 35.64 13.20 33.43 51.43 3.66 5.38
4th Sacred Heart 0.2276 37.40 14.64 34.27 47.58 4.82 6.04
5th Robert Morris 0.2491 39.03 14.12 35.91 45.99 4.46 6.71
6th Saint Francis (PA) 0.2570 38.68 12.98 36.65 49.42 3.46 6.76
7th St. Francis Brooklyn 0.2860 41.07 12.47 37.91 45.56 3.74 8.89
8th Fairleigh Dickinson 0.3072 43.57 12.85 40.46 42.70 4.11 8.16

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,366.9132 1,377.5509 1,383.3745 1,386.4049 1,378.5609
Difference 10.6377 16.4613 19.4917 15.5302

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
LIU Brooklyn 91 2,060 938 102 132 45.53 20.2 15.6 1,972 840 111 187 57.40 17.8 10.5
Bryant 140 3,114 1,381 173 181 44.35 18.0 17.2 2,970 1,236 143 249 58.38 20.8 11.9
Sacred Heart 99 2,235 1,000 147 246 44.74 15.2 9.1 2,155 918 114 173 57.40 18.9 12.5
Central Conn. St. 91 2,010 908 130 158 45.17 15.5 12.7 1,949 847 119 149 56.54 16.4 13.1
Robert Morris 116 2,478 1,055 171 261 42.58 14.5 9.5 2,613 1,200 161 211 54.08 16.2 12.4
St. Francis Brooklyn 104 2,195 934 155 202 42.55 14.2 10.9 2,325 1,077 198 229 53.68 11.7 10.2
Saint Francis (PA) 98 2,017 825 99 155 40.90 20.4 13.0 2,248 1,067 143 162 52.54 15.7 13.9
Fairleigh Dickinson 103 1,943 753 94 135 38.76 20.7 14.4 2,414 1,264 187 215 47.64 12.9 11.2
Conference Average 105 2,257 974 134 184 43.07 17.3 12.8 2,331 1,056 147 197 54.71 16.3 12.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NEC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.38

2018-11-16 Brooklyn, N.Y.
Bryant
Central Conn. St.
3
2
21
25
25
23
23
25
25
21
15
11
GAME

71.74

2018-11-09 Smithfield, R.I.
Bryant
LIU Brooklyn
2
3
25
22
27
29
22
25
29
27
10
15
GAME

68.75

2018-10-05 Loretto, PA
Saint Francis (PA)
LIU Brooklyn
2
3
23
25
27
25
22
25
27
25
5
15
GAME

68.15

2018-10-20 Moon Township, Pa.
Robert Morris
Bryant
2
3
25
23
23
25
24
26
26
24
16
18
GAME

67.90

2018-10-12 Fairfield, Conn.
Sacred Heart
Saint Francis (PA)
3
0
27
25
25
23
31
29
GAME

67.35

2018-09-30 Brooklyn, N.Y.
LIU Brooklyn
Bryant
3
1
28
26
17
25
25
21
25
23
GAME

67.35

2018-09-28 Brooklyn, N.Y.
LIU Brooklyn
Bryant
3
1
28
26
17
25
25
21
25
23
GAME

67.29

2018-11-02 Fairfield, Conn.
Sacred Heart
Bryant
2
3
22
25
25
21
25
15
23
25
15
17
GAME

67.25

2018-10-19 Brooklyn, NY
St. Francis Brooklyn
Sacred Heart
3
2
25
22
23
25
27
25
15
25
15
13
GAME

66.44

2018-10-19 Moon Township, Pa.
Robert Morris
Central Conn. St.
1
3
21
25
25
21
24
26
19
25

HuskerGeek NEC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 25.9869
2 25.5582
3 25.3227
4 22.0480
5 21.8868
6 18.9526
7 17.4204
8 17.0334
9 15.7873
10 15.5602

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.3964
2 16.8770
3 12.4673
4 10.5891
5 10.4367
6 10.4334
7 10.3527
8 8.7905
9 8.0849
10 7.9341

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.0876
2 16.7677
3 16.2275
4 15.9394
5 14.4093
6 12.4499
7 12.3400
8 11.2977
9 10.8432
10 9.6301

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2625
2 0.1972
3 0.1914
4 0.1914
5 0.1872
6 0.1848
7 0.1826
8 0.1798
9 0.1712
10 0.1696

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1757
2 0.1370
3 0.1232
4 0.1056
5 0.1054
6 0.0954
7 0.0940
8 0.0862
9 0.0853
10 0.0840

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1783
2 0.1468
3 0.1452
4 0.1436
5 0.1399
6 0.1311
7 0.1198
8 0.1106
9 0.1035
10 0.1034


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek