Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NEC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Robert Morris 1,546.9828 1,518.1750 1,532.5112 43.36 57.72 -0.027
2nd Sacred Heart 1,541.1511 1,502.7655 1,521.8373 44.64 52.46 -0.061
3rd Central Conn. St. 1,496.2688 1,463.7630 1,479.9267 41.81 52.49 -0.084
4th Bryant 1,482.7366 1,450.9974 1,466.7811 42.86 50.23 -0.109
5th LIU 1,475.2192 1,440.7219 1,457.8685 41.02 50.82 -0.117
6th St. Francis Brooklyn 1,409.1443 1,377.0549 1,393.0072 42.83 43.17 -0.154
7th Fairleigh Dickinson 1,310.9166 1,277.6400 1,294.1714 36.40 42.04 -0.259
8th Saint Francis (PA) 1,295.0442 1,262.7316 1,278.7858 37.39 38.31 -0.248
9th Merrimack 1,197.5961 1,167.0848 1,182.2420 27.60 35.90 -0.395

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Robert Morris 0.1956 32.50 12.94 29.47 53.74 5.61 6.25
2nd Sacred Heart 0.1734 34.72 17.39 31.13 47.40 7.75 4.99
3rd Central Conn. St. 0.1695 31.45 14.50 29.94 54.52 7.13 5.10
4th LIU 0.1491 32.41 17.50 30.81 51.89 6.84 6.28
5th Bryant 0.1384 32.51 18.66 29.51 49.32 6.65 5.91
6th St. Francis Brooklyn 0.1383 28.70 14.88 26.39 57.80 5.38 5.15
7th Saint Francis (PA) 0.0922 26.96 17.74 25.67 56.86 6.85 6.09
8th Fairleigh Dickinson 0.0482 20.82 16.00 20.02 67.94 5.72 3.69
9th Merrimack 0.0114 23.84 22.70 22.38 58.63 8.37 4.87

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Robert Morris 0.2228 37.14 14.86 35.05 48.79 6.63 6.13
2nd Sacred Heart 0.2344 36.71 13.28 33.53 49.06 5.16 5.95
3rd Bryant 0.2477 38.52 13.75 35.75 46.83 4.77 5.17
4th Central Conn. St. 0.2536 38.48 13.12 35.85 49.10 4.79 5.62
5th LIU 0.2657 39.86 13.29 37.01 47.10 3.94 6.63
6th St. Francis Brooklyn 0.2918 40.91 11.73 37.24 44.21 4.39 9.28
7th Fairleigh Dickinson 0.3068 43.72 13.04 41.35 42.76 3.71 9.17
8th Saint Francis (PA) 0.3398 44.55 10.56 40.46 40.20 3.30 10.37
9th Merrimack 0.4060 50.69 10.09 46.36 35.72 2.70 12.91

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,400.7924 1,413.1969 1,418.3510 1,439.2190 1,417.8898
Difference 12.4045 17.5586 38.4266 22.7966

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Robert Morris 107 2,281 1,137 178 188 49.85 12.8 12.1 1,925 754 110 174 60.83 17.5 11.1
Sacred Heart 117 2,577 1,280 154 172 49.67 16.7 15.0 2,311 1,033 123 230 55.30 18.8 10.0
Central Conn. St. 114 2,458 1,195 146 183 48.62 16.8 13.4 2,253 988 112 197 56.15 20.1 11.4
St. Francis Brooklyn 119 2,535 1,349 167 205 53.22 15.2 12.4 2,473 1,287 210 263 47.96 11.8 9.4
Bryant 113 2,349 1,130 170 201 48.11 13.8 11.7 2,322 1,105 108 201 52.41 21.5 11.6
LIU 105 2,190 1,002 147 193 45.75 14.9 11.3 2,270 1,084 125 219 52.25 18.2 10.4
Fairleigh Dickinson 98 1,882 820 96 129 43.57 19.6 14.6 2,291 1,227 185 203 46.44 12.4 11.3
Saint Francis (PA) 93 1,666 735 119 272 44.12 14.0 6.1 2,217 1,291 207 177 41.77 10.7 12.5
Merrimack 78 1,252 458 77 160 36.58 16.3 7.8 1,888 1,124 227 166 40.47 8.3 11.4
Conference Average 105 2,132 1,012 139 189 46.61 15.6 11.6 2,217 1,099 156 203 50.40 15.5 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NEC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.95

2019-11-22 Moon Township, Pa.
Robert Morris
Central Conn. St.
2
3
24
26
20
25
25
23
26
24
12
15
GAME

72.52

2019-11-15
Central Conn. St.
Bryant
3
1
24
26
25
20
25
22
25
21
GAME

71.67

2019-11-02 Moon Township, Pa.
Robert Morris
Sacred Heart
3
1
25
20
25
21
22
25
25
23
GAME

71.57

2019-10-11
Sacred Heart
Central Conn. St.
3
1
26
24
24
26
25
14
25
20
GAME

70.35

2019-11-13
Central Conn. St.
Sacred Heart
1
3
21
25
25
20
20
25
15
25
GAME

70.28

2019-10-05
Sacred Heart
Robert Morris
1
3
18
25
22
25
28
26
23
25
GAME

70.26

2019-11-08 Moon Township, Pa.
Robert Morris
Central Conn. St.
3
2
25
18
25
23
17
25
21
25
15
8
GAME

69.97

2019-09-27
St. Francis Brooklyn
Sacred Heart
2
3
25
23
23
25
19
25
25
22
7
15
GAME

69.95

2019-10-25 Brooklyn, N.Y.
LIU
Central Conn. St.
2
3
25
13
21
25
25
19
8
25
19
21
GAME

69.41

2019-10-30
St. Francis Brooklyn
LIU
3
1
27
25
22
25
25
22
27
25

HuskerGeek NEC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.9914
2 21.6543
3 19.7690
4 19.3903
5 18.6572
6 17.9804
7 17.7618
8 17.3461
9 16.8630
10 16.7295

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.6052
2 13.2044
3 10.8496
4 10.6406
5 10.0082
6 9.9837
7 9.8994
8 9.8188
9 9.6709
10 8.8373

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.6044
2 15.6651
3 13.8860
4 13.2993
5 10.8047
6 10.6820
7 10.4826
8 10.4539
9 9.7937
10 9.7608

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2631
2 0.2043
3 0.1919
4 0.1866
5 0.1795
6 0.1744
7 0.1690
8 0.1665
9 0.1655
10 0.1645

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1807
2 0.1320
3 0.1065
4 0.1024
5 0.0985
6 0.0977
7 0.0972
8 0.0952
9 0.0924
10 0.0900

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1612
2 0.1424
3 0.1389
4 0.1187
5 0.1167
6 0.1070
7 0.1019
8 0.1002
9 0.0979
10 0.0968


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek