Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NEWMAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Babson 1,501.1149 1,466.5277 1,483.7205 54.89 67.97 0.231
2nd MIT 1,497.4648 1,464.4174 1,480.8489 59.56 58.67 0.214
3rd Wellesley 1,500.5041 1,457.8778 1,479.0374 59.02 57.40 0.187
4th Coast Guard 1,414.6511 1,382.7416 1,398.6054 53.09 57.17 0.109
5th Springfield 1,414.0785 1,382.7525 1,398.3278 55.67 57.75 0.129
6th Emerson 1,413.6355 1,378.7465 1,396.0820 52.86 59.36 0.132
7th Wheaton (MA) 1,362.2216 1,327.0744 1,344.5332 53.27 54.78 0.071
8th WPI 1,354.1612 1,318.5194 1,336.2215 50.73 56.62 0.076
9th Clark (MA) 1,311.7452 1,271.5122 1,291.4720 49.75 52.11 0.010
10th Smith 1,245.6625 1,202.3736 1,223.8267 46.80 47.64 -0.054
11th Mount Holyoke 1,171.4513 1,130.5320 1,150.8098 42.52 45.97 -0.147

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Babson 0.2956 40.75 11.19 37.16 46.98 2.75 11.31
2nd MIT 0.2933 43.26 13.93 40.02 41.49 3.98 11.00
3rd Wellesley 0.2640 41.00 14.59 38.38 45.89 4.28 11.73
4th Emerson 0.2574 38.22 12.48 34.86 49.77 2.84 8.65
5th Springfield 0.2520 36.78 11.59 34.14 51.80 2.72 9.63
6th Coast Guard 0.2347 38.28 14.81 36.00 47.63 4.18 11.12
7th WPI 0.2144 35.40 13.95 32.42 51.35 3.89 10.39
8th Wheaton (MA) 0.1963 35.19 15.56 32.69 51.08 4.13 10.84
9th Clark (MA) 0.1638 29.65 13.27 28.42 57.60 4.73 5.94
10th Smith 0.1201 29.08 17.07 27.00 60.60 4.07 10.91
11th Mount Holyoke 0.0902 28.90 19.88 26.97 58.60 4.85 9.64

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Babson 0.0643 24.82 18.39 23.09 59.69 4.87 6.68
2nd Wellesley 0.0773 27.11 19.38 24.43 56.43 5.27 8.61
3rd MIT 0.0795 26.79 18.83 25.35 57.99 6.42 8.41
4th Springfield 0.1228 27.94 15.67 26.06 56.40 4.96 8.10
5th Coast Guard 0.1254 28.52 15.98 25.39 58.34 4.12 7.12
6th Wheaton (MA) 0.1255 28.11 15.56 26.18 57.38 3.93 8.99
7th Emerson 0.1257 29.15 16.58 26.95 57.53 4.75 8.47
8th WPI 0.1383 31.43 17.60 28.82 52.02 4.60 8.92
9th Clark (MA) 0.1537 31.72 16.34 29.09 53.41 3.22 11.01
10th Smith 0.1737 33.32 15.95 30.56 53.67 5.04 11.55
11th Mount Holyoke 0.2376 39.83 16.07 36.25 45.85 4.11 13.16

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,362.1350 1,372.1061 1,377.7542 1,374.7540 1,371.6873
Difference 9.9711 15.6192 12.6190 12.7364

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Babson 111 2,522 1,307 291 370 51.82 8.7 6.8 1,953 699 139 250 64.21 14.1 7.8
MIT 112 2,593 1,433 262 238 55.26 9.9 10.9 2,136 983 184 188 53.98 11.6 11.4
Wellesley 99 2,208 1,202 251 221 54.44 8.8 10.0 1,884 898 164 192 52.34 11.5 9.8
Springfield 106 2,322 1,190 203 252 51.25 11.4 9.2 2,199 1,034 186 217 52.98 11.8 10.1
Emerson 95 2,150 1,064 183 191 49.49 11.7 11.3 2,003 908 180 182 54.67 11.1 11.0
WPI 105 2,163 1,079 239 263 49.88 9.1 8.2 2,064 974 197 222 52.81 10.5 9.3
Coast Guard 109 2,153 1,066 250 315 49.51 8.6 6.8 2,075 996 172 248 52.00 12.1 8.4
Wheaton (MA) 112 1,981 1,052 275 294 53.10 7.2 6.7 1,930 1,012 199 221 47.57 9.7 8.7
Clark (MA) 106 1,905 921 114 146 48.35 16.7 13.0 2,061 1,064 245 194 48.38 8.4 10.6
Mount Holyoke 88 1,745 842 216 192 48.25 8.1 9.1 1,893 998 229 184 47.28 8.3 10.3
Smith 108 2,119 1,014 250 258 47.85 8.5 8.2 2,378 1,288 271 216 45.84 8.8 11.0
Conference Average 105 2,169 1,106 230 249 50.84 9.9 9.1 2,052 987 197 210 52.00 10.7 9.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NEWMAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

69.86

2019-09-24 Boston, Mass.
Emerson
Babson
3
1
26
24
15
25
25
21
25
23
GAME

68.52

2019-09-28 New London, Conn.
Coast Guard
MIT
2
3
22
25
25
20
30
28
17
25
8
15
GAME

67.96

2019-10-29 Babson Park, MA
Babson
Wellesley
3
2
25
22
20
25
19
25
25
23
15
12
GAME

67.60

2019-11-02 Worcester, MA
WPI
MIT
2
3
25
21
23
25
25
20
23
25
14
16
GAME

66.64

2019-11-02 Boston, Mass.
Emerson
Springfield
3
1
26
24
23
25
25
16
25
22
GAME

65.99

2019-11-05
MIT
Emerson
2
3
25
17
25
21
18
25
23
25
11
15
GAME

65.83

2019-10-29
MIT
Emerson
3
0
28
26
25
21
25
22
GAME

65.69

2019-10-15 Norton, Mass.
Wheaton (MA)
Babson
1
3
25
17
22
25
11
25
24
26
GAME

65.66

2019-09-17 Cambridge, Mass.
MIT
Springfield
3
2
25
19
23
25
22
25
25
20
15
10
GAME

65.50

2019-10-08 Babson Park, MA
Babson
MIT
3
1
23
25
25
13
25
21
25
20

HuskerGeek NEWMAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.4697
2 21.7724
3 21.5190
4 18.8819
5 18.8023
6 17.9116
7 16.4222
8 15.6394
9 15.0648
10 15.0286

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.8921
2 14.1989
3 13.7572
4 12.3285
5 12.2137
6 11.7402
7 11.5755
8 10.8253
9 9.6586
10 9.6286

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.5641
2 14.3061
3 12.6812
4 11.3028
5 10.5726
6 9.4632
7 9.4451
8 8.9220
9 8.9037
10 8.6208

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2416
2 0.2339
3 0.2075
4 0.2035
5 0.1919
6 0.1809
7 0.1711
8 0.1699
9 0.1685
10 0.1606

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1527
2 0.1495
3 0.1392
4 0.1375
5 0.1298
6 0.1272
7 0.1246
8 0.1223
9 0.1166
10 0.1093

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1522
2 0.1414
3 0.1165
4 0.1132
5 0.1014
6 0.1014
7 0.1007
8 0.0994
9 0.0979
10 0.0889


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek