Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NSIC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wayne St. (NE) 1,693.9990 1,700.3078 1,697.1505 60.13 65.33 0.258
2nd Concordia-St. Paul 1,690.7117 1,689.2095 1,689.9605 60.14 59.68 0.267
3rd St. Cloud St. 1,619.8274 1,621.9399 1,620.8833 57.63 57.21 0.173
4th Southwest Minn. St. 1,610.6451 1,618.0472 1,614.3419 58.70 57.62 0.165
5th Minn. Duluth 1,597.8786 1,599.7947 1,598.8364 56.24 56.09 0.153
6th Northern St. 1,561.7501 1,568.9350 1,565.3384 57.13 53.65 0.125
7th Winona St. 1,555.8948 1,560.9129 1,558.4019 56.53 52.71 0.121
8th Sioux Falls 1,554.6942 1,559.5153 1,557.1029 57.26 51.88 0.128
9th Augustana (SD) 1,510.1293 1,512.8721 1,511.5001 53.92 50.53 0.062
10th Minnesota St. 1,498.4529 1,501.2530 1,499.8523 52.65 52.81 0.081
11th Bemidji St. 1,465.0840 1,472.5457 1,468.8101 51.38 47.56 0.027
12th MSU Moorhead 1,436.6730 1,439.4474 1,438.0595 52.77 49.11 0.007
13th Mary 1,398.4186 1,399.5774 1,398.9979 51.29 46.05 -0.036
14th Minn.-Crookston 1,371.2061 1,369.9607 1,370.5832 50.13 44.45 -0.079
15th Minot St. 1,324.6929 1,325.2618 1,324.9773 47.94 41.84 -0.106

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Concordia-St. Paul 0.3720 49.02 11.83 45.72 35.95 3.19 9.81
2nd Wayne St. (NE) 0.3661 43.87 7.26 40.22 46.75 2.53 8.55
3rd St. Cloud St. 0.2866 44.22 15.57 40.67 39.35 5.86 9.41
4th Southwest Minn. St. 0.2769 39.45 11.76 36.54 45.44 5.49 8.93
5th Sioux Falls 0.2716 41.16 14.00 38.20 41.81 6.29 8.70
6th Minn. Duluth 0.2674 41.47 14.73 38.47 42.74 4.61 7.81
7th Winona St. 0.2557 37.40 11.83 34.67 46.14 3.65 7.62
8th Northern St. 0.2439 37.18 12.79 34.76 48.91 5.05 8.62
9th Minnesota St. 0.2348 36.92 13.44 34.22 47.87 4.40 8.41
10th Bemidji St. 0.2172 37.79 16.06 34.60 45.55 4.80 9.51
11th Augustana (SD) 0.2154 37.45 15.92 34.88 45.97 5.45 8.25
12th MSU Moorhead 0.1989 34.14 14.25 31.08 51.84 4.77 7.23
13th Mary 0.1680 30.96 14.16 28.52 55.57 5.06 7.76
14th Minn.-Crookston 0.1521 29.64 14.43 27.34 54.13 5.12 7.21
15th Minot St. 0.1179 28.58 16.80 26.41 52.64 4.96 7.31

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Concordia-St. Paul 0.1050 27.74 17.24 25.71 56.28 7.12 5.27
2nd Wayne St. (NE) 0.1085 28.91 18.07 27.84 55.52 7.20 5.27
3rd Southwest Minn. St. 0.1121 27.69 16.48 25.69 57.76 6.02 3.74
4th St. Cloud St. 0.1131 28.45 17.13 26.40 56.91 5.73 5.18
5th Minn. Duluth 0.1149 27.84 16.35 25.81 55.57 6.22 5.71
6th Northern St. 0.1192 28.38 16.46 26.09 58.23 6.35 6.17
7th Winona St. 0.1346 28.10 14.65 25.73 55.63 4.97 5.64
8th Sioux Falls 0.1431 30.66 16.35 28.06 51.54 6.54 6.83
9th Augustana (SD) 0.1535 30.18 14.83 28.41 54.95 5.64 5.01
10th Minnesota St. 0.1539 32.82 17.43 29.78 50.31 7.24 7.27
11th Bemidji St. 0.1899 33.78 14.79 30.40 52.21 5.30 8.99
12th MSU Moorhead 0.1924 35.37 16.13 32.29 49.84 5.06 5.67
13th Mary 0.2035 34.39 14.04 31.83 50.14 5.29 6.39
14th Minot St. 0.2238 35.73 13.35 32.68 46.89 3.06 10.10
15th Minn.-Crookston 0.2310 36.42 13.32 34.03 48.54 3.51 6.69

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,527.6531 1,530.2053 1,530.1932 1,534.6937 1,530.6863
Difference 2.5522 2.5401 7.0406 4.0443

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wayne St. (NE) 116 2,704 1,482 189 145 54.81 14.3 18.6 2,183 871 139 223 60.10 15.7 9.8
Concordia-St. Paul 116 2,763 1,506 222 269 54.51 12.4 10.3 2,233 1,008 134 156 54.86 16.7 14.3
Southwest Minn. St. 104 2,397 1,294 179 174 53.98 13.4 13.8 2,106 983 87 138 53.32 24.2 15.3
St. Cloud St. 109 2,414 1,279 199 213 52.98 12.1 11.3 2,109 1,000 132 191 52.58 16.0 11.0
Northern St. 101 2,149 1,182 166 144 55.00 12.9 14.9 1,966 978 140 147 50.25 14.0 13.4
Minn. Duluth 104 2,199 1,137 159 182 51.71 13.8 12.1 2,013 977 140 170 51.47 14.4 11.8
Winona St. 104 2,302 1,227 145 179 53.30 15.9 12.9 2,179 1,117 143 188 48.74 15.2 11.6
Minnesota St. 93 2,040 1,047 156 191 51.32 13.1 10.7 1,979 990 153 173 49.98 12.9 11.4
Sioux Falls 100 2,180 1,145 151 146 52.52 14.4 14.9 2,167 1,131 165 137 47.81 13.1 15.8
Augustana (SD) 103 2,227 1,134 157 194 50.92 14.2 11.5 2,250 1,191 134 156 47.07 16.8 14.4
MSU Moorhead 93 1,880 941 116 142 50.05 16.2 13.2 2,132 1,157 143 169 45.73 14.9 12.6
Mary 105 2,083 1,054 152 154 50.60 13.7 13.5 2,347 1,318 166 175 43.84 14.1 13.4
Bemidji St. 99 1,970 971 171 249 49.29 11.5 7.9 2,125 1,174 209 211 44.75 10.2 10.1
Minn.-Crookston 88 1,623 787 104 149 48.49 15.6 10.9 2,053 1,200 148 160 41.55 13.9 12.8
Minot St. 100 1,798 845 118 163 47.00 15.2 11.0 2,344 1,413 248 198 39.72 9.5 11.8
Conference Average 102 2,182 1,135 159 180 51.77 13.9 12.5 2,146 1,101 152 173 48.78 14.8 12.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

HuskerGeek NSIC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.5469
2 25.8670
3 25.3437
4 24.1043
5 24.0192
6 21.4243
7 21.3124
8 21.0892
9 20.6403
10 20.5749

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.7672
2 16.6856
3 15.9742
4 15.9059
5 15.7980
6 15.7123
7 15.3455
8 14.3561
9 12.7470
10 12.5856

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.0401
2 16.7580
3 15.5334
4 14.8085
5 14.7059
6 14.6608
7 14.6519
8 13.8822
9 13.3517
10 12.4713

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2553
2 0.2464
3 0.2292
4 0.2243
5 0.2211
6 0.2145
7 0.2128
8 0.2013
9 0.1998
10 0.1967

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1604
2 0.1586
3 0.1496
4 0.1459
5 0.1414
6 0.1398
7 0.1367
8 0.1358
9 0.1332
10 0.1246

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1849
2 0.1822
3 0.1542
4 0.1532
5 0.1527
6 0.1494
7 0.1423
8 0.1357
9 0.1341
10 0.1229


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek