Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NWC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Whitworth 1,545.9108 1,545.6840 1,545.7974 63.45 52.67 0.226
2nd Pacific Lutheran 1,522.0538 1,519.3602 1,520.7064 62.28 54.34 0.177
3rd Puget Sound 1,486.1229 1,484.4492 1,485.2858 61.58 52.27 0.152
4th George Fox 1,441.5917 1,445.3100 1,443.4496 54.48 56.33 0.096
5th Pacific (OR) 1,440.0678 1,430.3585 1,435.2050 53.70 51.49 0.097
6th Willamette 1,436.3785 1,433.1893 1,434.7830 56.28 53.04 0.073
7th Lewis & Clark 1,421.1831 1,420.9185 1,421.0508 57.10 52.18 0.108
8th Whitman 1,400.1754 1,396.4152 1,398.2940 59.30 47.86 0.059
9th Linfield 1,393.0807 1,394.0806 1,393.5806 52.09 52.79 0.084

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Whitworth 0.2759 40.26 12.67 37.43 45.22 3.89 9.38
2nd Pacific Lutheran 0.2578 38.13 12.35 35.61 47.78 3.74 9.67
3rd Puget Sound 0.2537 38.43 13.06 34.68 46.67 3.06 10.82
4th Lewis & Clark 0.2312 36.94 13.82 33.80 49.33 4.42 9.82
5th Pacific (OR) 0.2279 36.67 13.89 33.82 51.55 3.84 8.51
6th George Fox 0.2080 34.26 13.46 31.68 50.92 4.16 9.62
7th Willamette 0.1881 35.01 16.20 32.20 50.21 3.72 9.13
8th Whitman 0.1825 32.66 14.40 29.31 49.01 4.28 9.11
9th Linfield 0.1807 33.56 15.49 31.94 54.07 4.56 10.10

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Whitworth 0.0503 23.88 18.85 21.87 59.66 6.33 5.78
2nd Pacific Lutheran 0.0804 25.27 17.23 22.99 60.06 4.81 8.02
3rd Linfield 0.0965 27.53 17.88 26.31 57.31 4.99 7.75
4th Puget Sound 0.1013 26.90 16.77 24.12 56.47 4.81 7.43
5th George Fox 0.1117 28.54 17.36 26.75 55.63 4.81 7.09
6th Willamette 0.1147 27.07 15.60 24.66 59.08 3.47 6.65
7th Lewis & Clark 0.1229 27.74 15.45 25.22 58.01 4.56 8.42
8th Whitman 0.1237 28.67 16.30 24.93 50.61 5.10 6.18
9th Pacific (OR) 0.1313 28.21 15.08 25.48 59.09 4.11 6.50

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,453.1281 1,448.3964 1,443.9548 1,437.8125 1,445.8230
Difference -4.7317 -9.1732 -15.3155 -9.7401

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Pacific Lutheran 85 1,508 855 143 160 56.70 10.5 9.4 1,374 707 141 138 48.54 9.7 10.0
Whitworth 97 1,958 1,103 164 186 56.33 11.9 10.5 1,718 899 131 156 47.67 13.1 11.0
Puget Sound 94 1,606 887 184 204 55.23 8.7 7.9 1,539 815 155 190 47.04 9.9 8.1
Willamette 78 1,468 746 135 169 50.82 10.9 8.7 1,461 747 129 184 48.87 11.3 7.9
Lewis & Clark 72 1,235 648 136 171 52.47 9.1 7.2 1,254 669 151 143 46.65 8.3 8.8
George Fox 76 672 325 121 95 48.36 5.6 7.1 709 357 109 144 49.65 6.5 4.9
Whitman 86 1,536 819 131 139 53.32 11.7 11.1 1,733 994 143 160 42.64 12.1 10.8
Linfield 79 964 472 135 186 48.96 7.1 5.2 1,081 581 146 127 46.25 7.4 8.5
Pacific (OR) 78 719 341 114 132 47.43 6.3 5.4 830 456 105 164 45.06 7.9 5.1
Conference Average 83 1,296 688 140 160 52.18 9.1 8.1 1,300 692 134 156 46.93 9.6 8.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NWC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

81.49

2021-09-29 Forest Grove, OR
Pacific (OR)
George Fox
2
3
26
28
25
21
22
25
25
18
13
15
GAME

78.05

2021-10-30
Pacific Lutheran
Whitworth
1
3
18
25
23
25
26
24
24
26
GAME

71.82

2021-11-03
Whitman
Whitworth
2
3
26
24
21
25
25
15
17
25
16
18
GAME

70.99

2021-09-18
Whitworth
Pacific (OR)
3
2
25
18
25
18
26
28
26
28
15
12
GAME

70.87

2021-10-22
Puget Sound
Pacific (OR)
1
3
25
27
18
25
33
31
22
25
GAME

69.80

2021-10-01
Whitworth
Puget Sound
3
1
24
26
25
17
25
21
25
15
GAME

69.56

2021-10-08
Lewis & Clark
Whitworth
2
3
27
25
19
25
24
26
26
24
9
15
GAME

68.81

2021-10-15
Willamette
Pacific Lutheran
1
3
16
25
25
22
23
25
23
25
GAME

67.86

2021-09-17
Puget Sound
Lewis & Clark
3
1
25
18
27
25
19
25
25
22
GAME

67.86

2021-09-04
Puget Sound
Pacific Lutheran
3
2
25
20
25
16
19
25
21
25
15
10

HuskerGeek NWC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 19.7676
2 15.6678
3 13.9420
4 13.4711
5 13.1666
6 12.6993
7 12.2207
8 11.1983
9 10.5812
10 10.5749

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.2657
2 8.2490
3 7.1141
4 6.7166
5 6.1217
6 5.9458
7 5.6206
8 5.2719
9 5.2668
10 5.2244

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.7251
2 12.7566
3 11.7873
4 11.5027
5 11.5019
6 9.8394
7 9.1776
8 7.4354
9 7.0951
10 7.0449

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2926
2 0.2579
3 0.2285
4 0.2253
5 0.2196
6 0.2081
7 0.1924
8 0.1909
9 0.1895
10 0.1816

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1493
2 0.1360
3 0.1270
4 0.1231
5 0.1160
6 0.1121
7 0.1112
8 0.1110
9 0.1010
10 0.0960

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2406
2 0.2400
3 0.1822
4 0.1717
5 0.1636
6 0.1566
7 0.1352
8 0.1278
9 0.1227
10 0.1180


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek