Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Northeast - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st LIU Brooklyn 1,561.0653 1,560.7899 1,560.9276 41.60 55.53 -0.043
2nd Bryant 1,542.7515 1,533.9318 1,538.3353 41.75 53.84 -0.060
3rd Bryant 1,542.7515 1,533.9318 1,538.3353 41.75 53.84 -0.060
4th Central Conn. St. 1,532.3671 1,524.2002 1,528.2782 38.67 55.73 -0.067
5th Central Conn. St. 1,532.3671 1,524.2002 1,528.2782 38.67 55.73 -0.067
6th Sacred Heart 1,523.8949 1,518.1658 1,521.0277 39.13 55.06 -0.084
7th Sacred Heart 1,523.8949 1,518.1658 1,521.0277 39.13 55.06 -0.084
8th Robert Morris 1,524.4885 1,505.4209 1,514.9247 40.25 53.46 -0.083
9th Robert Morris 1,524.4885 1,505.4209 1,514.9247 40.25 53.46 -0.083
10th Saint Francis (PA) 1,477.4477 1,465.1395 1,471.2807 35.57 53.03 -0.116
11th Saint Francis (PA) 1,477.4477 1,465.1395 1,471.2807 35.57 53.03 -0.116
12th St. Francis Brooklyn 1,425.9502 1,418.3977 1,422.1689 32.36 49.58 -0.176
13th St. Francis Brooklyn 1,425.9502 1,418.3977 1,422.1689 32.36 49.58 -0.176
14th Fairleigh Dickinson 1,391.6439 1,382.8598 1,387.2449 34.46 45.48 -0.205
15th Fairleigh Dickinson 1,391.6439 1,382.8598 1,387.2449 34.46 45.48 -0.205

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st LIU Brooklyn 0.1658 32.05 15.48 30.21 53.31 6.56 6.00
2nd Robert Morris 0.1625 32.09 15.84 29.48 52.82 6.47 7.53
3rd Robert Morris 0.1625 32.09 15.84 29.48 52.82 6.47 7.53
4th Bryant 0.1602 33.00 16.98 30.81 50.20 6.59 5.72
5th Bryant 0.1602 33.00 16.98 30.81 50.20 6.59 5.72
6th Central Conn. St. 0.1570 31.19 15.49 29.20 55.08 6.88 4.71
7th Central Conn. St. 0.1570 31.19 15.49 29.20 55.08 6.88 4.71
8th Sacred Heart 0.1455 35.18 20.62 32.38 45.26 9.04 6.00
9th Sacred Heart 0.1455 35.18 20.62 32.38 45.26 9.04 6.00
10th Saint Francis (PA) 0.1399 29.16 15.17 27.47 58.14 5.99 4.40
11th Saint Francis (PA) 0.1399 29.16 15.17 27.47 58.14 5.99 4.40
12th St. Francis Brooklyn 0.1303 32.43 19.40 30.49 51.70 6.42 5.47
13th St. Francis Brooklyn 0.1303 32.43 19.40 30.49 51.70 6.42 5.47
14th Fairleigh Dickinson 0.0904 24.78 15.74 22.81 61.74 6.44 4.60
15th Fairleigh Dickinson 0.0904 24.78 15.74 22.81 61.74 6.44 4.60

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st LIU Brooklyn 0.2090 35.12 14.21 32.85 52.37 4.77 5.58
2nd Bryant 0.2205 36.35 14.30 34.22 48.51 4.71 5.17
3rd Bryant 0.2205 36.35 14.30 34.22 48.51 4.71 5.17
4th Central Conn. St. 0.2238 37.38 15.00 35.65 48.18 6.11 4.41
5th Central Conn. St. 0.2238 37.38 15.00 35.65 48.18 6.11 4.41
6th Sacred Heart 0.2300 37.73 14.73 34.72 48.42 5.43 4.73
7th Sacred Heart 0.2300 37.73 14.73 34.72 48.42 5.43 4.73
8th Robert Morris 0.2457 38.15 13.58 35.26 48.19 4.32 5.15
9th Robert Morris 0.2457 38.15 13.58 35.26 48.19 4.32 5.15
10th Saint Francis (PA) 0.2563 37.75 12.12 35.45 51.19 3.67 5.11
11th Saint Francis (PA) 0.2563 37.75 12.12 35.45 51.19 3.67 5.11
12th Fairleigh Dickinson 0.2958 42.34 12.77 39.28 45.03 3.64 8.37
13th Fairleigh Dickinson 0.2958 42.34 12.77 39.28 45.03 3.64 8.37
14th St. Francis Brooklyn 0.3061 44.25 13.64 40.52 41.99 5.19 8.24
15th St. Francis Brooklyn 0.3061 44.25 13.64 40.52 41.99 5.19 8.24

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,488.4966 1,490.7135 1,495.7905 1,499.2435 1,493.5610
Difference 2.2170 7.2940 10.7469 6.7526

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Central Conn. St. 110 2,474 1,100 129 156 44.46 19.2 15.9 2,338 959 107 164 58.98 21.9 14.3
Bryant 125 2,749 1,270 166 204 46.20 16.6 13.5 2,650 1,157 137 218 56.34 19.3 12.2
LIU Brooklyn 116 2,549 1,155 158 185 45.31 16.1 13.8 2,475 1,062 148 201 57.09 16.7 12.3
Sacred Heart 112 2,445 1,071 158 231 43.80 15.5 10.6 2,387 1,015 108 223 57.48 22.1 10.7
Robert Morris 119 2,607 1,162 209 243 44.57 12.5 10.7 2,569 1,127 132 228 56.13 19.5 11.3
Saint Francis (PA) 97 2,069 861 108 157 41.61 19.2 13.2 2,137 926 114 175 56.67 18.7 12.2
St. Francis Brooklyn 100 2,058 808 131 204 39.26 15.7 10.1 2,294 1,064 191 212 53.62 12.0 10.8
Fairleigh Dickinson 98 1,997 826 110 88 41.36 18.2 22.7 2,307 1,160 191 196 49.72 12.1 11.8
Conference Average 110 2,369 1,032 146 184 43.32 16.6 13.8 2,395 1,059 141 202 55.75 17.8 11.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Northeast

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.81

2017-10-06 Brooklyn, N.Y.
LIU Brooklyn
Robert Morris
3
2
26
24
25
23
21
25
23
25
15
13
GAME

75.24

2017-11-17 Brooklyn, N.Y.
Bryant
Central Conn. St.
2
3
25
15
24
26
22
25
25
20
13
15
GAME

75.16

2017-11-11 Moon Township, Pa.
Robert Morris
Central Conn. St.
2
3
19
25
32
30
28
26
20
25
7
15
GAME

74.99

2017-10-21 Loretto, PA (SFU)
Saint Francis (PA)
LIU Brooklyn
0
3
24
26
22
25
22
25
GAME

73.54

2017-11-10 Loretto, PA (SFU)
Saint Francis (PA)
Central Conn. St.
1
3
25
22
24
26
22
25
20
25
GAME

72.52

2017-11-18 Brooklyn, N.Y.
LIU Brooklyn
Central Conn. St.
3
2
25
20
24
26
26
24
21
25
15
12
GAME

72.20

2017-11-03 New Britain, CT
Central Conn. St.
Sacred Heart
3
2
25
18
25
21
22
25
21
25
15
10
GAME

72.08

2017-09-22 New Britain, CT
Central Conn. St.
LIU Brooklyn
2
3
25
22
15
25
23
25
25
16
13
15
GAME

71.80

2017-10-06 Fairfield, Conn.
Sacred Heart
Central Conn. St.
2
3
18
25
21
25
25
22
27
25
12
15
GAME

70.90

2017-10-27 Fairifield, CT
Sacred Heart
Robert Morris
2
3
25
23
25
23
22
25
20
25
16
18

HuskerGeek Northeast All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.9994
2 21.5991
3 21.0936
4 20.7016
5 20.0106
6 19.7942
7 19.2673
8 18.8105
9 17.8236
10 17.4153

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.4793
2 12.7330
3 11.8777
4 11.7366
5 10.8948
6 10.2238
7 10.0688
8 9.0758
9 8.9507
10 8.6355

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.3071
2 18.7371
3 18.0011
4 14.7510
5 13.8977
6 13.8170
7 12.3499
8 11.2663
9 11.1950
10 10.5641

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1986
2 0.1920
3 0.1883
4 0.1862
5 0.1848
6 0.1799
7 0.1796
8 0.1753
9 0.1747
10 0.1740

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1204
2 0.1061
3 0.1021
4 0.1019
5 0.0992
6 0.0956
7 0.0952
8 0.0932
9 0.0897
10 0.0878

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1856
2 0.1751
3 0.1703
4 0.1260
5 0.1234
6 0.1220
7 0.1219
8 0.1199
9 0.1154
10 0.1056


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek