Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

OVC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Morehead St. 1,474.1568 1,484.7043 1,479.4211 45.98 61.81 0.067
2nd Belmont 1,386.9343 1,407.3312 1,397.0955 40.18 59.10 -0.001
3rd Southeast Mo. St. 1,402.6621 1,388.8011 1,395.7144 42.60 58.40 -0.004
4th Austin Peay 1,384.0994 1,376.6034 1,380.3463 39.83 59.00 -0.013
5th Tennessee St. 1,350.8173 1,363.4770 1,357.1324 40.03 55.86 -0.062
6th Jacksonville St. 1,341.5258 1,342.7059 1,342.1157 40.87 54.88 -0.037
7th Eastern Ill. 1,338.3084 1,339.2120 1,338.7601 38.71 56.59 -0.038
8th SIUE 1,342.1941 1,316.7941 1,329.4334 41.03 53.68 -0.061
9th Eastern Ky. 1,323.5717 1,324.3454 1,323.9585 39.06 53.98 -0.092
10th Murray St. 1,289.8410 1,278.6014 1,284.2089 38.29 52.22 -0.099
11th UT Martin 1,282.8412 1,262.4413 1,272.6004 37.42 53.26 -0.102
12th Tennessee Tech 1,233.7797 1,254.9815 1,244.3354 36.75 48.89 -0.123

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Austin Peay 0.2184 36.38 14.53 33.98 49.10 5.37 5.39
2nd Morehead St. 0.2176 38.51 16.75 35.69 45.28 5.81 5.99
3rd Belmont 0.2047 34.23 13.76 32.52 52.32 5.50 5.22
4th Eastern Ill. 0.2003 36.73 16.70 34.62 46.85 6.57 5.82
5th Southeast Mo. St. 0.1945 32.27 12.81 30.05 55.40 5.02 5.43
6th Jacksonville St. 0.1761 31.70 14.09 29.10 51.77 5.31 5.50
7th Tennessee St. 0.1642 35.14 18.72 32.55 47.33 6.13 6.51
8th SIUE 0.1496 31.42 16.45 28.94 56.14 5.44 4.95
9th Murray St. 0.1461 33.21 18.60 31.08 48.90 7.70 4.92
10th Eastern Ky. 0.1433 31.19 16.86 29.04 53.85 6.32 6.92
11th UT Martin 0.1365 30.87 17.23 28.64 54.57 6.53 6.21
12th Tennessee Tech 0.1147 28.17 16.70 26.76 58.21 6.08 4.64

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Morehead St. 0.1511 30.81 15.71 28.91 55.17 6.43 4.03
2nd Southeast Mo. St. 0.1989 35.00 15.11 33.32 50.36 5.54 4.96
3rd Belmont 0.2059 34.81 14.22 32.41 51.57 4.69 3.82
4th SIUE 0.2109 35.89 14.80 33.36 50.71 5.12 4.86
5th Jacksonville St. 0.2128 35.53 14.25 32.71 50.57 4.78 4.76
6th Tennessee St. 0.2261 36.99 14.37 34.51 49.27 4.22 4.75
7th Austin Peay 0.2313 37.81 14.68 35.06 49.00 4.80 4.41
8th Eastern Ky. 0.2357 38.26 14.69 36.05 49.01 4.19 6.08
9th Tennessee Tech 0.2379 39.46 15.67 36.48 44.53 6.92 6.88
10th Eastern Ill. 0.2380 38.44 14.64 35.81 47.40 5.90 5.60
11th UT Martin 0.2389 37.31 13.42 34.78 49.79 4.57 4.85
12th Murray St. 0.2452 38.77 14.25 36.46 46.41 5.03 4.97

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,345.4269 1,342.1366 1,343.9587 1,345.2911 1,344.2033
Difference -3.2903 -1.4681 -0.1358 -1.6314

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Morehead St. 122 2,775 1,323 161 235 47.68 17.2 11.8 2,379 905 102 203 61.96 23.3 11.7
Southeast Mo. St. 134 2,802 1,235 158 142 44.08 17.7 19.7 2,673 1,092 145 213 59.15 18.4 12.5
Tennessee St. 118 2,583 1,125 178 258 43.55 14.5 10.0 2,555 1,082 121 215 57.65 21.1 11.9
Austin Peay 121 2,656 1,097 136 197 41.30 19.5 13.5 2,637 1,073 120 204 59.31 22.0 12.9
Belmont 128 2,773 1,130 139 329 40.75 19.9 8.4 2,804 1,168 113 234 58.35 24.8 12.0
Jacksonville St. 121 2,457 1,069 145 271 43.51 16.9 9.1 2,512 1,119 131 252 55.45 19.2 10.0
SIUE 101 1,954 845 106 143 43.25 18.4 13.7 2,010 909 120 177 54.78 16.8 11.4
Eastern Ill. 124 2,630 1,033 145 247 39.28 18.1 10.6 2,801 1,226 160 207 56.23 17.5 13.5
Eastern Ky. 105 2,182 889 144 178 40.74 15.2 12.3 2,346 1,066 145 231 54.56 16.2 10.2
UT Martin 118 2,427 967 152 234 39.84 16.0 10.4 2,665 1,219 130 218 54.26 20.5 12.2
Murray St. 93 1,930 783 95 127 40.57 20.3 15.2 2,109 986 110 164 53.25 19.2 12.9
Tennessee Tech 99 1,899 759 95 110 39.97 20.0 17.3 2,236 1,126 160 157 49.64 14.0 14.2
Conference Average 115 2,422 1,021 138 206 42.04 17.8 12.7 2,477 1,081 130 206 56.22 19.4 12.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the OVC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

69.64

2012-10-12 Cape Girardeau, Mo.
Southeast Mo. St.
Belmont
3
2
25
18
23
25
18
25
25
23
15
13
GAME

69.60

2012-10-12 Jacksonville, Ala.
Jacksonville St.
Morehead St.
2
3
28
26
25
22
20
25
23
25
9
15
GAME

68.56

2012-11-03 Clarksville, TN
Austin Peay
Southeast Mo. St.
3
2
19
25
20
25
25
23
27
25
15
7
GAME

67.80

2012-09-21 Clarksville, TN
Austin Peay
Jacksonville St.
1
3
32
30
22
25
20
25
23
25
GAME

67.61

2012-10-27 Morehead, Ky.
Morehead St.
Jacksonville St.
3
2
25
14
25
13
26
28
23
25
15
13
GAME

67.04

2012-10-20 Richmond, Ky.
Eastern Ky.
Southeast Mo. St.
3
2
19
25
27
25
25
23
20
25
15
8
GAME

66.63

2012-11-15 Morehead, Ky.
Jacksonville St.
Southeast Mo. St.
1
3
22
25
20
25
25
19
21
25
GAME

66.18

2012-10-06 Edwardsville, Ill.
SIUE
Morehead St.
1
3
21
25
17
25
25
18
22
25
GAME

66.08

2012-10-05 Charleston, Ill.
Eastern Ill.
Morehead St.
2
3
22
25
13
25
25
22
25
22
12
15
GAME

65.75

2012-11-03 Nashville, Tenn.
Belmont
Morehead St.
1
3
25
23
14
25
16
25
18
25

HuskerGeek OVC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 30.3776
2 25.3408
3 24.8266
4 24.4510
5 23.0412
6 22.7191
7 21.8152
8 21.4450
9 20.5704
10 19.5932

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.7926
2 16.5616
3 15.0590
4 14.6847
5 13.3077
6 12.5487
7 12.3209
8 11.6267
9 11.3366
10 11.1097

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.4856
2 20.2404
3 18.5022
4 17.7447
5 17.6278
6 17.4562
7 17.1983
8 14.9012
9 14.6912
10 12.8243

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2392
2 0.2094
3 0.2052
4 0.2021
5 0.1920
6 0.1914
7 0.1893
8 0.1853
9 0.1817
10 0.1757

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1480
2 0.1369
3 0.1276
4 0.1214
5 0.1167
6 0.1071
7 0.1046
8 0.1026
9 0.0961
10 0.0922

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1797
2 0.1757
3 0.1662
4 0.1588
5 0.1581
6 0.1499
7 0.1457
8 0.1421
9 0.1263
10 0.1060


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek