Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

OVC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Austin Peay 1,627.2248 1,615.7623 1,621.4834 44.82 59.04 0.016
2nd SIUE 1,589.7014 1,563.9567 1,576.7765 43.78 57.08 -0.003
3rd Murray St. 1,564.9428 1,558.2194 1,561.5775 42.47 55.81 -0.047
4th Eastern Ill. 1,541.8008 1,534.8597 1,538.3263 40.16 55.87 -0.051
5th Belmont 1,545.6834 1,520.6570 1,533.1191 40.00 56.82 -0.018
6th Eastern Ky. 1,534.5023 1,520.7353 1,527.6033 40.28 55.17 -0.067
7th UT Martin 1,526.9258 1,510.1046 1,518.4919 39.82 53.25 -0.074
8th Jacksonville St. 1,516.7260 1,505.4185 1,511.0617 38.08 53.99 -0.086
9th Southeast Mo. St. 1,504.8153 1,497.7545 1,501.2808 39.52 51.89 -0.077
10th Morehead St. 1,491.5361 1,478.7190 1,485.1137 37.38 52.92 -0.091
11th Tennessee St. 1,482.8977 1,462.2378 1,472.5315 36.72 52.17 -0.106
12th Tennessee Tech 1,440.4685 1,423.4210 1,431.9194 34.93 49.04 -0.146

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Austin Peay 0.2240 37.15 14.75 35.19 48.39 6.15 6.25
2nd SIUE 0.1976 36.27 16.51 34.06 49.66 6.00 5.40
3rd Eastern Ill. 0.1790 33.14 15.24 30.68 53.33 6.17 5.85
4th Southeast Mo. St. 0.1777 33.94 16.17 31.61 51.12 5.82 5.32
5th Murray St. 0.1769 33.80 16.11 31.81 50.80 6.90 6.63
6th Belmont 0.1716 34.81 17.66 32.07 49.03 6.17 6.84
7th Morehead St. 0.1647 35.00 18.53 33.22 48.39 6.43 5.89
8th Jacksonville St. 0.1629 33.05 16.76 31.20 51.36 7.20 2.89
9th Eastern Ky. 0.1580 33.30 17.50 30.87 49.48 6.91 4.43
10th UT Martin 0.1487 33.19 18.32 30.59 50.71 7.00 4.34
11th Tennessee St. 0.1466 31.93 17.28 29.85 53.14 5.35 4.80
12th Tennessee Tech 0.1246 29.27 16.81 26.73 54.74 6.20 4.26

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Belmont 0.1893 34.06 15.13 31.72 50.77 5.31 5.79
2nd SIUE 0.2008 34.16 14.08 31.89 53.49 5.05 5.39
3rd Austin Peay 0.2076 34.50 13.74 31.91 53.12 4.90 4.99
4th UT Martin 0.2230 36.92 14.62 34.44 48.32 5.86 5.93
5th Murray St. 0.2244 35.15 12.71 32.83 53.81 3.05 5.64
6th Eastern Ky. 0.2254 37.53 14.99 35.23 48.33 4.81 4.51
7th Eastern Ill. 0.2297 36.97 13.99 34.52 48.46 5.49 5.26
8th Jacksonville St. 0.2485 39.39 14.54 37.33 45.92 5.68 6.57
9th Tennessee St. 0.2524 37.91 12.67 34.59 48.59 3.87 6.71
10th Southeast Mo. St. 0.2550 39.81 14.31 36.52 45.78 5.94 6.81
11th Morehead St. 0.2561 39.63 14.02 37.42 45.94 5.97 6.97
12th Tennessee Tech 0.2709 39.52 12.43 36.19 47.94 3.32 6.32

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,523.2738 1,522.5882 1,522.0718 1,521.6472 1,522.3952
Difference -0.6855 -1.2020 -1.6266 -1.1714

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Austin Peay 132 3,020 1,437 199 208 47.58 15.2 14.5 2,704 1,097 133 187 59.43 20.3 14.5
SIUE 119 2,695 1,270 152 176 47.12 17.7 15.3 2,462 1,020 128 220 58.57 19.2 11.2
Jacksonville St. 142 3,116 1,425 129 150 45.73 24.2 20.8 2,931 1,226 178 272 58.17 16.5 10.8
Murray St. 117 2,648 1,214 185 202 45.85 14.3 13.1 2,516 1,070 134 231 57.47 18.8 10.9
Eastern Ill. 113 2,484 1,077 150 193 43.36 16.6 12.9 2,457 1,057 122 142 56.98 20.1 17.3
Morehead St. 103 2,286 993 152 207 43.44 15.0 11.0 2,279 986 151 183 56.74 15.1 12.5
Belmont 113 2,413 1,015 167 340 42.06 14.4 7.1 2,448 1,047 131 222 57.23 18.7 11.0
Southeast Mo. St. 121 2,555 1,130 148 160 44.23 17.3 16.0 2,633 1,217 176 209 53.78 15.0 12.6
UT Martin 110 2,380 1,026 115 190 43.11 20.7 12.5 2,473 1,130 144 189 54.31 17.2 13.1
Eastern Ky. 129 2,709 1,141 128 199 42.12 21.2 13.6 2,829 1,268 129 258 55.18 21.9 11.0
Tennessee St. 112 2,267 906 120 195 39.97 18.9 11.6 2,553 1,205 165 232 52.80 15.5 11.0
Tennessee Tech 97 1,980 767 96 177 38.74 20.6 11.2 2,313 1,125 140 184 51.36 16.5 12.6
Conference Average 117 2,546 1,117 145 200 43.61 18.0 13.3 2,550 1,121 144 211 56.00 17.9 12.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the OVC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.21

2017-09-22 Clarksville, TN
Austin Peay
SIUE
3
2
25
19
24
26
25
21
17
25
19
17
GAME

78.02

2017-10-21 Charleston, Ill.
Eastern Ill.
Jacksonville St.
3
2
23
25
21
25
27
25
27
25
15
11
GAME

76.88

2017-11-18 Clarksville, TN
Austin Peay
Murray St.
3
2
21
25
25
23
20
25
25
21
15
10
GAME

76.01

2017-11-08 Clarksville, TN
Austin Peay
Murray St.
1
3
25
19
19
25
21
25
21
25
GAME

75.99

2017-10-27 Edwardsville, Ill.
SIUE
Murray St.
3
2
25
22
25
19
16
25
23
25
15
13
GAME

74.41

2017-09-23 Murray, Ky
Murray St.
SIUE
3
2
26
24
20
25
26
24
18
25
15
13
GAME

74.09

2017-10-28 Edwardsville, Ill.
SIUE
Austin Peay
2
3
25
23
25
22
20
25
20
25
8
15
GAME

73.94

2017-11-17 Clarksville, TN
Eastern Ill.
Murray St.
1
3
25
21
24
26
19
25
17
25
GAME

73.80

2017-09-23 Clarksville, TN
Austin Peay
Eastern Ill.
3
1
16
25
25
10
31
29
25
18
GAME

73.65

2017-10-28 Charleston, Ill.
Eastern Ill.
Murray St.
1
3
27
25
20
25
17
25
21
25

HuskerGeek OVC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.5182
2 26.3509
3 22.6588
4 22.6419
5 22.6190
6 22.1826
7 21.7340
8 21.4504
9 20.4073
10 20.0797

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.3309
2 16.4656
3 15.4601
4 14.7709
5 14.2090
6 13.6486
7 12.3186
8 11.6691
9 11.2248
10 11.1718

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.4191
2 17.7650
3 17.6051
4 16.3045
5 16.1324
6 16.1135
7 14.9935
8 14.7122
9 14.4950
10 13.1235

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2332
2 0.2160
3 0.1937
4 0.1919
5 0.1852
6 0.1791
7 0.1776
8 0.1725
9 0.1700
10 0.1693

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1389
2 0.1310
3 0.1307
4 0.1257
5 0.1159
6 0.1090
7 0.1064
8 0.1008
9 0.1008
10 0.0993

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1600
2 0.1462
3 0.1439
4 0.1428
5 0.1394
6 0.1387
7 0.1356
8 0.1251
9 0.1160
10 0.1154


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek