Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

OVC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st UT Martin 1,421.7812 1,424.1224 1,422.9513 49.06 48.37 -0.058
2nd Tennessee Tech 1,392.4009 1,398.8200 1,395.6067 47.39 47.97 -0.055
3rd Southeast Mo. St. 1,387.6446 1,395.2505 1,391.4423 48.44 47.97 -0.063
4th Tennessee St. 1,387.1383 1,392.1849 1,389.6593 45.86 47.22 -0.055
5th Eastern Ill. 1,384.8644 1,391.1233 1,387.9903 43.34 49.80 -0.093
6th Lindenwood 1,363.7081 1,368.1340 1,365.9192 46.20 47.73 -0.072
7th SIUE 1,356.6110 1,368.6494 1,362.6169 45.87 46.28 -0.093
8th Morehead St. 1,355.5179 1,360.4326 1,357.9730 45.16 46.64 -0.089
9th Little Rock 1,302.1996 1,311.5730 1,306.8779 42.73 43.86 -0.135
10th Southern Ind. 1,274.2370 1,281.0494 1,277.6386 42.60 43.95 -0.155

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Lindenwood 0.1861 33.06 14.46 30.82 51.81 5.84 8.23
2nd UT Martin 0.1775 33.49 15.74 30.33 51.10 5.57 6.65
3rd Tennessee Tech 0.1770 35.35 17.65 33.54 47.71 7.22 6.34
4th Morehead St. 0.1668 33.91 17.23 31.54 49.73 7.08 4.98
5th Southeast Mo. St. 0.1607 31.89 15.82 29.83 53.96 6.84 5.89
6th Tennessee St. 0.1598 33.49 17.50 30.54 49.72 5.52 5.46
7th SIUE 0.1569 32.79 17.10 30.69 50.57 7.23 6.03
8th Eastern Ill. 0.1562 34.87 19.25 32.42 47.81 7.51 6.76
9th Southern Ind. 0.1257 29.16 16.59 26.44 58.21 6.35 4.94
10th Little Rock 0.1121 29.62 18.42 27.95 54.60 6.69 5.76

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Tennessee St. 0.2152 36.00 14.48 33.23 47.92 6.38 5.53
2nd Southeast Mo. St. 0.2232 36.30 13.98 33.86 51.42 5.57 7.04
3rd Tennessee Tech 0.2319 37.81 14.62 34.42 47.34 5.75 6.85
4th UT Martin 0.2352 37.79 14.28 34.89 47.37 5.08 6.17
5th Little Rock 0.2473 39.28 14.55 36.83 45.09 6.11 8.30
6th Eastern Ill. 0.2496 38.81 13.84 36.38 48.05 4.48 5.76
7th SIUE 0.2498 38.20 13.23 35.29 46.34 5.20 6.60
8th Morehead St. 0.2560 38.50 12.90 35.26 47.62 5.10 7.09
9th Lindenwood 0.2585 38.83 12.98 35.38 46.80 4.47 7.21
10th Southern Ind. 0.2807 41.31 13.24 37.82 45.51 4.34 7.21

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,365.8676 1,369.7607 1,375.9335 1,376.5464 1,372.0271
Difference 3.8931 10.0659 10.6789 8.2126

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
UT Martin 132 2,986 1,588 210 226 53.18 14.2 13.2 2,779 1,362 159 250 50.99 17.5 11.1
Southeast Mo. St. 131 2,876 1,488 172 188 51.74 16.7 15.3 2,813 1,396 188 223 50.37 15.0 12.6
Lindenwood 112 2,272 1,143 199 325 50.31 11.4 7.0 2,328 1,160 161 182 50.17 14.5 12.8
Tennessee Tech 118 2,523 1,249 158 267 49.51 16.0 9.4 2,591 1,315 176 241 49.25 14.7 10.8
Eastern Ill. 124 2,756 1,295 183 217 46.99 15.1 12.7 2,732 1,318 142 268 51.76 19.2 10.2
Tennessee St. 143 3,105 1,536 183 253 49.47 17.0 12.3 3,054 1,553 157 239 49.15 19.5 12.8
Morehead St. 107 2,302 1,129 119 189 49.04 19.3 12.2 2,361 1,203 160 197 49.05 14.8 12.0
SIUE 117 2,505 1,233 155 210 49.22 16.2 11.9 2,558 1,322 156 240 48.32 16.4 10.7
Southern Ind. 107 2,180 1,007 119 202 46.19 18.3 10.8 2,519 1,343 175 220 46.69 14.4 11.5
Little Rock 120 2,416 1,124 141 199 46.52 17.1 12.1 2,718 1,480 216 230 45.55 12.6 11.8
Conference Average 121 2,592 1,279 164 228 49.22 16.1 11.7 2,645 1,345 169 229 49.13 15.8 11.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the OVC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.44

2022-10-21
Morehead St.
Eastern Ill.
3
1
31
33
29
27
25
21
25
22
GAME

69.62

2022-11-17 Martin, TN
Morehead St.
Tennessee St.
2
3
24
26
23
25
25
23
26
24
9
15
GAME

68.32

2022-11-11
Tennessee Tech
UT Martin
1
3
23
25
25
23
14
25
21
25
GAME

68.22

2022-10-21
UT Martin
Lindenwood
3
2
27
25
24
26
25
8
18
25
15
12
GAME

67.23

2022-11-11
Morehead St.
Southeast Mo. St.
3
2
25
21
25
22
20
25
19
25
15
8
GAME

67.18

2022-09-30
UT Martin
Southeast Mo. St.
3
1
25
19
30
28
17
25
25
19
GAME

67.15

2022-09-24
Southeast Mo. St.
Tennessee St.
3
2
25
23
21
25
23
25
25
17
15
8
GAME

67.12

2022-10-14
Eastern Ill.
UT Martin
3
2
30
28
25
18
21
25
14
25
15
13
GAME

67.08

2022-10-20
Morehead St.
Eastern Ill.
3
0
25
20
32
30
29
27
GAME

66.67

2022-11-04
Southeast Mo. St.
SIUE
3
1
25
27
25
22
25
20
25
23

HuskerGeek OVC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.0772
2 26.3928
3 24.9920
4 22.9601
5 21.7001
6 20.2713
7 19.9682
8 19.9518
9 19.9495
10 19.7308

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.2165
2 14.0662
3 14.0072
4 13.8267
5 13.3889
6 11.9033
7 11.6761
8 10.9363
9 10.8632
10 10.1603

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 25.8765
2 23.4535
3 19.7493
4 17.6955
5 16.3523
6 13.5959
7 12.5660
8 12.4147
9 11.9745
10 11.7214

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2220
2 0.2146
3 0.2030
4 0.1886
5 0.1865
6 0.1826
7 0.1772
8 0.1739
9 0.1644
10 0.1628

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1251
2 0.1197
3 0.1168
4 0.1142
5 0.1074
6 0.1072
7 0.1064
8 0.1006
9 0.0925
10 0.0842

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1975
2 0.1663
3 0.1496
4 0.1427
5 0.1398
6 0.1343
7 0.1222
8 0.1160
9 0.1152
10 0.1095


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek