Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

PAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Westminster (PA) 1,394.9051 1,361.3227 1,378.0116 53.55 54.90 0.065
2nd Geneva 1,387.7224 1,350.9525 1,369.2140 54.83 51.52 0.053
3rd Bethany (WV) 1,335.9718 1,300.0471 1,317.8871 50.74 48.73 0.029
4th Grove City 1,333.4077 1,299.4454 1,316.3170 49.67 55.86 0.025
5th Saint Vincent 1,316.1377 1,275.4271 1,295.6225 49.48 52.07 0.001
6th Thiel 1,288.6899 1,250.9285 1,269.6688 47.56 50.95 -0.028
7th Wash. & Jeff. 1,264.8490 1,233.1023 1,248.8748 31.44 21.10 -0.043
8th Chatham 1,210.8786 1,174.8503 1,192.7284 50.03 40.77 -0.089
9th Waynesburg 1,164.0270 1,122.9644 1,143.3113 43.58 42.52 -0.146

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Bethany (WV) 0.1933 34.58 15.26 31.48 50.72 3.62 9.15
2nd Westminster (PA) 0.1831 31.08 12.78 28.02 58.34 3.36 7.26
3rd Geneva 0.1756 32.06 14.50 29.42 55.06 3.56 10.10
4th Saint Vincent 0.1695 30.31 13.36 27.53 57.85 3.91 7.10
5th Grove City 0.1682 31.76 14.94 29.43 54.56 3.93 7.21
6th Thiel 0.1300 27.77 14.76 25.42 57.28 3.59 8.44
7th Wash. & Jeff. 0.1241 26.53 14.12 24.97 60.83 6.40 14.26
8th Chatham 0.0816 25.29 17.13 22.95 61.01 3.62 7.63
9th Waynesburg 0.0621 25.13 18.92 24.14 60.93 4.26 8.29

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Westminster (PA) 0.1185 27.11 15.26 25.35 58.66 3.97 7.71
2nd Geneva 0.1226 28.00 15.73 26.09 56.92 4.02 5.80
3rd Grove City 0.1437 28.95 14.58 26.42 56.80 3.77 7.67
4th Thiel 0.1580 31.77 15.97 28.56 56.88 3.81 9.86
5th Bethany (WV) 0.1641 30.52 14.11 27.67 53.51 4.23 8.54
6th Wash. & Jeff. 0.1675 31.27 14.52 28.96 55.79 3.94 5.53
7th Saint Vincent 0.1686 31.69 14.83 29.36 55.53 4.11 9.17
8th Chatham 0.1707 32.21 15.14 28.85 54.48 3.12 9.15
9th Waynesburg 0.2078 34.88 14.10 31.56 53.09 3.10 10.99

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,281.2928 1,287.1875 1,289.6740 1,293.8695 1,288.0060
Difference 5.8947 8.3812 12.5766 8.9508

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Grove City 107 2,097 1,264 172 199 60.28 12.2 10.5 1,617 728 138 178 54.98 11.7 9.1
Westminster (PA) 114 2,430 1,489 170 111 61.28 14.3 21.9 1,827 863 149 198 52.76 12.3 9.2
Geneva 109 2,277 1,345 237 236 59.07 9.6 9.6 1,961 987 112 142 49.67 17.5 13.8
Saint Vincent 118 2,508 1,430 160 214 57.02 15.7 11.7 2,207 1,096 207 193 50.34 10.7 11.4
Thiel 105 1,800 1,003 155 188 55.72 11.6 9.6 1,692 888 193 186 47.52 8.8 9.1
Bethany (WV) 119 2,299 1,296 211 223 56.37 10.9 10.3 2,090 1,114 216 178 46.70 9.7 11.7
Chatham 88 1,853 1,080 134 137 58.28 13.8 13.5 1,897 1,120 164 141 40.96 11.6 13.5
Waynesburg 92 1,619 893 143 161 55.16 11.3 10.1 1,777 1,042 204 177 41.36 8.7 10.0
Wash. & Jeff. 96 735 240 99 109 32.65 7.4 6.7 3,257 3,008 154 181 7.65 21.1 18.0
Conference Average 105 1,958 1,116 165 175 55.09 11.9 11.6 2,036 1,205 171 175 43.55 12.4 11.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the PAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

82.11

2019-10-05 Greenville, Pa.
Wash. & Jeff.
Saint Vincent
3
2
24
26
25
22
25
22
22
25
15
11
GAME

76.23

2019-10-03 Washington, Pa.
Wash. & Jeff.
Westminster (PA)
2
3
25
19
25
21
21
25
23
25
7
15
GAME

74.25

2019-09-28
Wash. & Jeff.
Grove City
1
3
26
24
17
25
15
25
22
25
GAME

72.72

2019-10-31 Washington, Pa.
Wash. & Jeff.
Chatham
2
3
27
25
25
18
15
25
22
25
12
15
GAME

72.18

2019-10-22 Washington, Pa.
Wash. & Jeff.
Bethany (WV)
1
3
24
26
17
25
25
19
19
25
GAME

67.54

2019-10-12
Geneva
Westminster (PA)
2
3
20
25
14
25
25
21
26
24
14
16
GAME

65.56

2019-10-15 Greenville, Pa.
Thiel
Grove City
3
2
26
24
25
22
17
25
18
25
16
14
GAME

65.22

2019-10-29
Bethany (WV)
Westminster (PA)
3
2
25
20
20
25
25
20
20
25
16
14
GAME

63.67

2019-09-28
Grove City
Geneva
1
3
23
25
25
22
14
25
22
25
GAME

63.55

2019-09-14 New Wilmington, PA
Westminster (PA)
Grove City
3
1
25
20
25
20
25
27
25
21

HuskerGeek PAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.0392
2 23.9201
3 21.7586
4 20.8864
5 19.9763
6 19.7724
7 19.2322
8 19.1733
9 18.9513
10 18.0563

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.2454
2 13.5013
3 11.2999
4 10.4911
5 10.1317
6 9.0668
7 8.4439
8 8.0676
9 7.4526
10 7.0831

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 25.2847
2 19.1411
3 18.2220
4 17.0370
5 15.0836
6 13.8974
7 13.2005
8 12.9262
9 11.3221
10 11.2675

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2788
2 0.2688
3 0.2316
4 0.2246
5 0.2229
6 0.2125
7 0.2112
8 0.1983
9 0.1966
10 0.1954

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1778
2 0.1251
3 0.1239
4 0.1049
5 0.1037
6 0.1021
7 0.1019
8 0.0944
9 0.0871
10 0.0808

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2841
2 0.2036
3 0.1862
4 0.1756
5 0.1672
6 0.1494
7 0.1452
8 0.1447
9 0.1410
10 0.1337


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek