Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

PAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Grove City 1,386.7861 1,384.1691 1,385.4770 59.75 46.55 0.053
2nd Bethany (WV) 1,379.7287 1,380.8310 1,380.2798 54.27 46.77 0.038
3rd Allegheny 1,375.5286 1,377.1056 1,376.3169 56.99 47.45 0.071
4th Thiel 1,356.5264 1,352.7881 1,354.6560 53.94 48.81 0.042
5th Chatham 1,338.2575 1,336.1950 1,337.2258 54.37 47.88 0.009
6th Geneva 1,306.5008 1,304.7623 1,305.6313 55.11 45.50 0.001
7th Saint Vincent 1,305.4702 1,304.0278 1,304.7488 56.25 42.85 0.005
8th Wash. & Jeff. 1,298.9379 1,301.2396 1,300.0882 53.69 45.49 0.002
9th Westminster (PA) 1,276.8426 1,273.6848 1,275.2627 52.12 42.95 -0.031
10th Franciscan 1,231.8381 1,233.7213 1,232.7793 53.25 42.28 -0.064
11th Waynesburg 1,143.6101 1,144.0729 1,143.8415 54.08 34.34 -0.133

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Allegheny 0.1943 34.13 14.69 30.26 52.59 3.98 9.92
2nd Thiel 0.1856 33.04 14.49 30.72 53.87 3.70 7.56
3rd Wash. & Jeff. 0.1754 32.11 14.57 29.75 54.36 4.14 7.08
4th Bethany (WV) 0.1680 33.68 16.88 31.07 51.32 4.36 9.96
5th Chatham 0.1597 29.52 13.56 27.44 51.58 4.56 10.82
6th Grove City 0.1502 29.37 14.35 27.18 56.77 4.47 9.31
7th Geneva 0.1455 28.53 13.98 26.58 55.23 3.87 10.24
8th Saint Vincent 0.1401 28.29 14.28 25.29 59.70 3.33 7.58
9th Westminster (PA) 0.1306 28.16 15.10 24.53 59.07 3.85 7.58
10th Franciscan 0.1205 28.06 16.01 25.69 58.25 4.20 8.48
11th Waynesburg 0.0339 19.44 16.05 17.56 69.14 3.43 5.56

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Grove City 0.0971 27.04 17.33 25.36 59.03 4.59 7.12
2nd Allegheny 0.1230 30.89 18.59 27.37 51.57 6.72 8.95
3rd Bethany (WV) 0.1296 28.64 15.68 26.39 56.93 6.05 6.63
4th Saint Vincent 0.1348 28.74 15.26 26.27 58.12 3.92 8.08
5th Thiel 0.1441 29.79 15.38 27.46 57.01 4.35 8.03
6th Geneva 0.1442 29.81 15.39 27.26 50.17 4.12 8.09
7th Chatham 0.1505 27.82 12.77 25.59 57.41 3.55 7.33
8th Westminster (PA) 0.1616 31.50 15.34 28.65 52.20 3.83 10.27
9th Waynesburg 0.1669 31.32 14.63 28.85 53.21 2.70 10.89
10th Wash. & Jeff. 0.1735 31.84 14.49 29.18 53.21 3.28 10.53
11th Franciscan 0.1843 31.71 13.28 28.91 56.11 2.00 8.66

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,308.7552 1,318.5543 1,321.9900 1,320.4700 1,317.4424
Difference 9.7991 13.2348 11.7148 11.5829

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Grove City 108 1,862 1,136 208 148 61.01 9.0 12.6 1,673 909 187 170 45.67 8.9 9.8
Chatham 99 2,175 1,225 220 262 56.32 9.9 8.3 2,113 1,133 142 154 46.38 14.9 13.7
Allegheny 104 1,882 1,085 193 206 57.65 9.8 9.1 1,780 982 174 218 44.83 10.2 8.2
Thiel 124 1,420 778 197 210 54.79 7.2 6.8 1,412 759 213 215 46.25 6.6 6.6
Saint Vincent 92 1,997 1,168 145 151 58.49 13.8 13.2 1,928 1,111 151 146 42.38 12.8 13.2
Geneva 110 1,809 1,017 198 217 56.22 9.1 8.3 1,807 1,014 170 168 43.89 10.6 10.8
Bethany (WV) 120 1,899 1,047 274 203 55.13 6.9 9.4 1,785 994 178 220 44.31 10.0 8.1
Wash. & Jeff. 84 1,656 916 111 108 55.31 14.9 15.3 1,724 964 185 159 44.08 9.3 10.8
Franciscan 75 1,438 809 126 115 56.26 11.4 12.5 1,534 908 129 136 40.81 11.9 11.3
Westminster (PA) 107 1,914 1,009 129 95 52.72 14.8 20.1 2,158 1,285 240 195 40.45 9.0 11.1
Waynesburg 82 1,249 712 70 106 57.01 17.8 11.8 1,661 1,102 202 169 33.65 8.2 9.8
Conference Average 100 1,755 991 170 166 56.45 11.3 11.6 1,780 1,015 179 177 42.97 10.2 10.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the PAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.69

2022-11-01
Saint Vincent
Chatham
1
3
21
25
24
26
25
23
23
25
GAME

70.38

2022-10-07
Allegheny
Geneva
3
2
9
25
21
25
25
22
30
28
15
11
GAME

68.65

2022-10-25
Grove City
Westminster (PA)
3
2
25
20
23
25
25
23
20
25
15
5
GAME

67.91

2022-10-27
Saint Vincent
Thiel
2
3
22
25
13
25
27
25
25
21
11
15
GAME

66.59

2022-11-03
Grove City
Bethany (WV)
2
3
22
25
25
23
25
21
21
25
13
15
GAME

65.81

2022-10-29
Saint Vincent
Geneva
3
1
25
21
25
10
27
29
27
25
GAME

65.58

2022-10-11
Bethany (WV)
Grove City
1
3
27
25
23
25
14
25
21
25
GAME

65.50

2022-10-15
Wash. & Jeff.
Thiel
2
3
22
25
25
19
18
25
25
23
12
15
GAME

65.42

2022-11-05 Greenville, Pa.
Thiel
Bethany (WV)
1
3
25
19
19
25
21
25
27
29
GAME

65.16

2022-09-22
Wash. & Jeff.
Chatham
3
1
25
23
25
16
24
26
25
22

HuskerGeek PAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.9178
2 21.7333
3 19.9060
4 19.1487
5 15.8543
6 15.4583
7 15.1326
8 15.1175
9 14.9080
10 14.5350

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.1081
2 8.7512
3 8.5682
4 8.4635
5 7.8614
6 7.7807
7 7.3068
8 7.2126
9 7.0601
10 6.6651

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.2051
2 16.1371
3 14.9654
4 14.4942
5 14.0865
6 13.7587
7 13.6301
8 13.6130
9 12.5158
10 12.1453

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2687
2 0.2387
3 0.2312
4 0.2253
5 0.2212
6 0.1999
7 0.1976
8 0.1933
9 0.1932
10 0.1881

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1168
2 0.1111
3 0.1098
4 0.1023
5 0.0996
6 0.0972
7 0.0883
8 0.0874
9 0.0869
10 0.0859

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2149
2 0.1973
3 0.1868
4 0.1817
5 0.1813
6 0.1768
7 0.1701
8 0.1637
9 0.1619
10 0.1518


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek