Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Pac-12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Southern California 1,697.5275 1,696.5678 1,697.0476 54.96 74.08 0.274
2nd UCLA 1,697.8264 1,678.2595 1,688.0146 54.53 72.81 0.261
3rd Stanford 1,646.9188 1,618.8259 1,632.8119 53.79 69.86 0.242
4th Washington 1,644.7706 1,615.7010 1,630.1710 51.94 72.42 0.219
5th Oregon 1,623.8350 1,606.2639 1,615.0255 51.91 69.62 0.193
6th California 1,624.3781 1,592.7057 1,608.4640 52.09 69.91 0.233
7th Arizona 1,568.2770 1,551.8846 1,560.0593 49.23 67.37 0.156
8th Oregon St. 1,521.7939 1,511.8716 1,516.8246 48.54 62.64 0.116
9th Arizona St. 1,508.5519 1,511.7747 1,510.1624 46.99 64.08 0.102
10th Utah 1,506.3949 1,484.9916 1,495.6550 45.28 65.02 0.127
11th Washington St. 1,486.0858 1,462.4719 1,474.2316 45.54 61.80 0.068
12th Colorado 1,449.8604 1,452.4832 1,451.1712 44.45 60.69 0.049

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Southern California 0.3674 46.49 9.75 42.65 41.77 3.97 6.35
2nd UCLA 0.3309 45.80 12.71 42.94 40.24 4.20 5.22
3rd Stanford 0.3243 42.88 10.44 40.38 45.88 3.34 5.23
4th California 0.3216 43.69 11.53 40.53 44.21 4.98 5.04
5th Washington 0.3177 41.34 9.58 38.13 48.69 3.56 7.16
6th Oregon 0.3103 43.94 12.92 40.34 41.16 5.53 5.99
7th Arizona 0.2907 41.69 12.63 38.30 43.20 4.37 6.04
8th Washington St. 0.2606 40.75 14.69 37.80 44.52 6.02 6.41
9th Utah 0.2573 37.88 12.15 34.88 50.62 4.06 4.83
10th Oregon St. 0.2536 38.42 13.06 35.11 48.23 5.14 5.88
11th Arizona St. 0.2450 38.44 13.94 35.37 46.79 5.45 5.73
12th Colorado 0.2305 37.47 14.42 34.33 46.27 5.10 5.63

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st UCLA 0.0695 26.72 19.77 25.13 57.83 7.72 3.15
2nd Stanford 0.0824 27.67 19.43 25.78 56.66 9.01 4.22
3rd California 0.0882 27.98 19.16 25.95 56.34 8.24 5.38
4th Southern California 0.0937 28.43 19.06 26.73 57.15 6.78 2.64
5th Washington 0.0987 30.43 20.56 29.42 52.98 9.17 3.32
6th Oregon 0.1170 29.18 17.48 27.28 56.47 6.25 3.06
7th Utah 0.1304 32.42 19.39 30.40 49.45 8.73 4.76
8th Arizona 0.1346 30.86 17.40 28.32 54.56 6.78 4.56
9th Oregon St. 0.1375 31.64 17.89 29.59 53.76 7.41 4.31
10th Arizona St. 0.1426 31.84 17.58 29.93 53.27 6.70 4.04
11th Colorado 0.1813 35.22 17.09 31.87 49.56 5.76 4.21
12th Washington St. 0.1929 36.72 17.42 34.35 47.03 6.71 5.63

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,573.3032 1,573.1420 1,571.1467 1,573.4511 1,572.7608
Difference -0.1612 -2.1565 0.1479 -0.7233

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Southern California 111 2,599 1,207 135 201 46.44 19.3 12.9 2,174 741 70 179 65.92 31.1 12.1
Washington 108 2,522 1,146 161 198 45.44 15.7 12.7 2,156 751 76 229 65.17 28.4 9.4
UCLA 124 2,849 1,309 127 175 45.95 22.4 16.3 2,441 867 93 227 64.48 26.2 10.8
California 116 2,699 1,242 114 185 46.02 23.7 14.6 2,352 862 135 236 63.35 17.4 10.0
Stanford 113 2,604 1,175 104 174 45.12 25.0 15.0 2,336 897 115 172 61.60 20.3 13.6
Oregon 114 2,602 1,148 133 226 44.12 19.6 11.5 2,363 903 84 214 61.79 28.1 11.0
Arizona 109 2,438 1,035 124 232 42.45 19.7 10.5 2,334 927 111 206 60.28 21.0 11.3
Oregon St. 120 2,513 1,060 131 202 42.18 19.2 12.4 2,586 1,143 119 200 55.80 21.7 12.9
Utah 107 2,289 885 92 240 38.66 24.9 9.5 2,415 1,019 126 198 57.81 19.2 12.2
Arizona St. 116 2,473 967 114 214 39.10 21.7 11.6 2,656 1,160 116 211 56.33 22.9 12.6
Washington St. 122 2,493 979 139 237 39.27 17.9 10.5 2,699 1,203 162 271 55.43 16.7 10.0
Colorado 109 2,215 839 104 186 37.88 21.3 11.9 2,507 1,150 112 184 54.13 22.4 13.6
Conference Average 114 2,525 1,083 123 206 42.72 20.9 12.5 2,418 969 110 211 60.17 23.0 11.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Pac-12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.06

2011-09-23 Los Angeles, Calif.
UCLA
Stanford
3
2
25
18
25
18
23
25
27
29
15
9
GAME

77.34

2011-10-14 Berkeley, CA
California
Washington
3
1
25
20
22
25
25
18
27
25
GAME

77.30

2011-11-25 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
California
1
3
26
24
27
29
23
25
14
25
GAME

76.60

2011-11-04 Los Angeles, Calif.
UCLA
Washington
3
0
28
26
25
13
28
26
GAME

76.34

2011-11-18 Berkeley, CA
California
Oregon St.
2
3
22
25
25
23
21
25
25
14
15
17
GAME

76.27

2011-11-25 Los Angeles, Calif.
UCLA
Southern California
1
3
26
24
24
26
21
25
20
25
GAME

76.12

2011-11-12 Seattle, Wash.
Washington
California
1
3
21
25
23
25
25
22
23
25
GAME

76.07

2011-11-19 Berkeley, CA
California
Oregon
2
3
25
23
25
19
18
25
24
26
9
15
GAME

75.94

2011-10-14 Los Angeles, Calif.
Southern California
Oregon
3
1
25
15
25
27
25
23
25
21
GAME

75.76

2011-10-08 Tempe, Ariz.
Arizona St.
Southern California
1
3
25
22
17
25
20
25
27
29

HuskerGeek Pac-12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.7506
2 28.9210
3 27.0561
4 25.0656
5 24.9856
6 24.6063
7 24.0656
8 23.7782
9 23.1514
10 22.8805

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.6602
2 16.7734
3 16.5659
4 16.1607
5 15.4988
6 15.4902
7 14.6088
8 14.6019
9 14.5610
10 14.3628

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.8659
2 17.4892
3 17.0088
4 16.5983
5 16.3761
6 16.1072
7 15.3340
8 13.9493
9 12.7373
10 12.6933

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2633
2 0.2559
3 0.2394
4 0.2279
5 0.2211
6 0.2093
7 0.2050
8 0.2031
9 0.2017
10 0.1999

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1563
2 0.1484
3 0.1430
4 0.1358
5 0.1347
6 0.1336
7 0.1315
8 0.1301
9 0.1281
10 0.1271

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1713
2 0.1519
3 0.1495
4 0.1482
5 0.1474
6 0.1413
7 0.1365
8 0.1354
9 0.1262
10 0.1225


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek