Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Pac-12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Stanford 1,697.4835 1,679.5589 1,688.4974 55.24 73.15 0.294
2nd Oregon 1,696.9116 1,678.9975 1,687.9308 53.83 74.45 0.264
3rd UCLA 1,683.1403 1,669.1336 1,676.1223 54.74 72.45 0.271
4th Southern California 1,648.5626 1,645.6729 1,647.1171 53.08 71.56 0.233
5th Washington 1,653.9720 1,636.1580 1,645.0409 52.10 72.64 0.253
6th California 1,580.8774 1,580.4074 1,580.6424 49.20 69.13 0.196
7th Arizona St. 1,584.4029 1,575.1889 1,579.7892 51.41 66.52 0.157
8th Arizona 1,560.7211 1,546.6014 1,553.6452 49.55 66.43 0.159
9th Utah 1,551.5334 1,550.5238 1,551.0285 49.35 65.92 0.178
10th Washington St. 1,515.2207 1,510.2677 1,512.7421 47.58 65.00 0.130
11th Oregon St. 1,524.4784 1,487.7130 1,505.9835 49.49 62.68 0.129
12th Colorado 1,473.9508 1,465.0524 1,469.4948 44.90 62.04 0.082

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st UCLA 0.3807 48.38 10.30 44.92 39.56 3.14 5.69
2nd Oregon 0.3735 49.97 12.62 46.23 34.60 5.79 6.92
3rd Stanford 0.3573 44.63 8.89 40.96 45.44 2.85 5.45
4th Southern California 0.3339 43.79 10.40 40.47 44.19 3.79 6.30
5th Washington 0.3279 42.93 10.15 39.76 45.69 3.08 7.86
6th California 0.3233 43.53 11.20 40.61 44.74 4.70 5.90
7th Utah 0.3074 43.16 12.42 39.59 44.89 4.56 5.89
8th Arizona 0.2923 42.79 13.56 39.96 43.22 3.88 6.04
9th Arizona St. 0.2804 42.13 14.09 39.08 42.88 6.24 6.33
10th Washington St. 0.2726 40.76 13.50 37.04 45.48 5.61 5.62
11th Oregon St. 0.2604 38.76 12.72 35.06 47.54 4.39 6.57
12th Colorado 0.2444 40.34 15.90 36.85 42.74 6.02 5.75

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Stanford 0.0636 25.45 19.09 24.14 58.50 8.59 3.65
2nd Washington 0.0751 28.96 21.45 28.27 52.63 10.55 3.50
3rd Southern California 0.1013 28.43 18.30 27.09 57.44 7.13 3.17
4th Oregon 0.1094 27.77 16.82 26.20 57.53 6.68 2.62
5th UCLA 0.1095 30.27 19.32 28.75 52.72 8.94 2.54
6th Arizona St. 0.1237 29.52 17.15 28.43 55.13 6.99 3.00
7th California 0.1268 30.95 18.27 28.92 52.68 8.50 4.74
8th Utah 0.1295 32.86 19.91 30.87 49.08 9.58 4.82
9th Oregon St. 0.1315 31.10 17.95 29.25 52.46 8.13 5.15
10th Arizona 0.1335 31.41 18.06 29.20 52.84 7.46 4.67
11th Washington St. 0.1428 32.69 18.42 31.00 50.88 7.51 3.97
12th Colorado 0.1621 34.56 18.36 31.79 48.00 7.14 6.21

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,591.5029 1,594.0042 1,593.2660 1,592.8772 1,592.9126
Difference 2.5014 1.7631 1.3744 1.8796

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Oregon 123 2,820 1,265 167 223 44.86 16.9 12.6 2,399 817 81 189 65.94 29.6 12.7
Stanford 121 2,823 1,301 120 181 46.09 23.5 15.6 2,416 863 115 198 64.28 21.0 12.2
Southern California 122 2,876 1,322 155 239 45.97 18.6 12.0 2,483 893 93 236 64.04 26.7 10.5
UCLA 108 2,527 1,150 114 160 45.51 22.2 15.8 2,200 795 75 194 63.86 29.3 11.3
Washington 112 2,600 1,128 174 308 43.39 14.9 8.4 2,336 832 96 226 64.38 24.3 10.3
Arizona St. 131 2,905 1,284 156 213 44.20 18.6 13.6 2,754 1,118 100 204 59.41 27.5 13.5
Arizona 113 2,493 1,059 126 180 42.48 19.8 13.9 2,445 1,005 132 214 58.90 18.5 11.4
California 113 2,482 1,009 117 181 40.65 21.2 13.7 2,418 950 134 176 60.71 18.0 13.7
Utah 125 2,723 1,150 138 232 42.23 19.7 11.7 2,693 1,117 152 202 58.52 17.7 13.3
Washington St. 113 2,481 1,040 120 167 41.92 20.7 14.9 2,443 1,018 118 207 58.33 20.7 11.8
Oregon St. 118 2,515 1,057 143 194 42.03 17.6 13.0 2,617 1,178 155 205 54.99 16.9 12.8
Colorado 113 2,349 938 113 202 39.93 20.8 11.6 2,516 1,112 177 216 55.80 14.2 11.6
Conference Average 118 2,633 1,142 137 207 43.27 19.5 13.1 2,477 975 119 206 60.76 22.1 12.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Pac-12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

84.95

2012-11-15 Los Angeles, Calif.
Southern California
Stanford
3
1
25
19
25
20
27
29
25
22
GAME

83.36

2012-11-16 Seattle, Wash.
Washington
Oregon
3
2
26
24
16
25
21
25
32
30
25
23
GAME

83.23

2012-09-26 Seattle, Wash.
Washington
UCLA
3
2
22
25
30
28
19
25
28
26
16
14
GAME

83.22

2012-10-12 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
UCLA
3
2
25
23
19
25
28
26
17
25
16
14
GAME

80.90

2012-11-16 Los Angeles, Calif.
Southern California
California
3
2
23
25
25
21
18
25
29
27
15
11
GAME

80.15

2012-10-26 Los Angeles, Calif.
Southern California
Washington
3
2
23
25
25
22
22
25
25
23
15
10
GAME

79.73

2012-10-05 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
Oregon
3
2
25
23
18
25
23
25
25
20
15
10
GAME

79.64

2012-11-16 Los Angeles, Calif.
UCLA
Stanford
1
3
22
25
18
25
25
15
25
27
GAME

78.77

2012-10-28 Los Angeles, Calif.
UCLA
Washington
3
1
25
18
25
22
22
25
28
26
GAME

77.31

2012-11-20 Eugene, Ore.
Oregon
UCLA
3
0
26
24
25
23
25
21

HuskerGeek Pac-12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.6044
2 27.4437
3 27.4153
4 26.1366
5 26.0112
6 25.7970
7 25.1230
8 25.0085
9 24.1529
10 23.9914

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.1374
2 19.2355
3 18.1085
4 17.0755
5 16.6299
6 16.2593
7 16.2120
8 15.8413
9 15.2476
10 14.1187

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.6609
2 19.3963
3 17.7165
4 17.1328
5 15.3270
6 15.0247
7 13.9840
8 13.0193
9 12.8132
10 12.5108

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2487
2 0.2472
3 0.2233
4 0.2186
5 0.2166
6 0.2158
7 0.2157
8 0.2150
9 0.2118
10 0.2093

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1751
2 0.1677
3 0.1630
4 0.1461
5 0.1441
6 0.1344
7 0.1337
8 0.1314
9 0.1309
10 0.1303

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1590
2 0.1514
3 0.1501
4 0.1416
5 0.1378
6 0.1333
7 0.1238
8 0.1227
9 0.1152
10 0.1144


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek