Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Pac-12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Washington 1,832.0811 1,707.8624 1,768.8817 55.38 75.86 0.301
2nd Southern California 1,817.9185 1,684.3622 1,749.8666 54.20 74.39 0.288
3rd Stanford 1,774.2615 1,643.0717 1,707.4070 51.55 72.58 0.242
4th UCLA 1,759.8896 1,630.4470 1,693.9323 53.18 68.97 0.208
5th Oregon 1,721.3468 1,599.9600 1,659.5439 49.49 68.13 0.180
6th Arizona 1,713.3902 1,575.7268 1,643.1174 50.02 67.58 0.169
7th Arizona St. 1,711.8044 1,568.2937 1,638.4786 50.52 66.79 0.164
8th Colorado 1,696.3629 1,578.9777 1,636.6182 48.51 66.25 0.170
9th Washington St. 1,696.5096 1,563.9089 1,628.8605 49.91 63.80 0.120
10th Oregon St. 1,647.4253 1,527.8581 1,586.5157 44.85 63.74 0.087
11th Utah 1,639.2070 1,514.0033 1,575.3618 45.79 63.06 0.098
12th California 1,621.4259 1,509.3641 1,564.3919 44.32 63.03 0.073

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Washington 0.3754 46.93 9.39 43.59 41.48 3.22 7.15
2nd Southern California 0.3645 46.70 10.24 43.46 41.94 3.63 7.94
3rd Stanford 0.3605 46.19 10.14 42.43 42.42 4.15 6.34
4th Oregon 0.3197 44.34 12.37 41.30 42.96 4.88 5.76
5th UCLA 0.3034 42.66 12.32 40.01 43.79 4.78 5.78
6th Colorado 0.3017 43.89 13.72 40.51 41.13 5.37 5.59
7th Arizona 0.2793 41.03 13.10 37.46 46.62 4.29 4.82
8th Arizona St. 0.2650 39.77 13.27 36.89 45.62 4.88 5.05
9th California 0.2648 40.51 14.03 37.90 45.38 5.51 4.55
10th Oregon St. 0.2539 37.66 12.27 34.85 50.93 4.85 6.12
11th Washington St. 0.2450 38.71 14.21 35.89 49.31 4.87 7.08
12th Utah 0.2419 39.01 14.82 36.71 48.33 5.87 6.48

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Washington 0.0741 27.62 20.21 26.19 56.21 9.33 3.40
2nd Southern California 0.0765 26.07 18.42 24.50 58.03 8.02 3.38
3rd UCLA 0.0949 27.70 18.21 26.61 57.33 7.30 3.57
4th Arizona St. 0.1014 29.99 19.86 28.94 52.51 8.98 3.16
5th Arizona 0.1107 28.62 17.55 27.41 57.26 7.09 3.45
6th Stanford 0.1184 30.88 19.03 29.38 51.12 9.09 4.06
7th Washington St. 0.1246 31.62 19.16 29.75 50.41 8.90 3.16
8th Colorado 0.1317 32.10 18.93 29.94 50.04 8.17 5.13
9th Oregon 0.1399 30.55 16.56 29.08 54.45 6.63 4.47
10th Utah 0.1435 31.61 17.26 29.19 52.93 7.05 4.78
11th Oregon St. 0.1671 33.77 17.06 32.01 51.44 6.85 4.46
12th California 0.1913 34.86 15.73 32.65 50.65 5.87 5.74

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,654.4146 1,651.9702 1,649.3092 1,650.0918 1,651.4465
Difference -2.4444 -5.1054 -4.3228 -3.9576

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Washington 116 2,764 1,321 165 247 47.79 16.8 11.2 2,173 685 84 228 68.48 25.9 9.5
Southern California 130 3,087 1,430 200 297 46.32 15.4 10.4 2,514 828 95 222 67.06 26.5 11.3
Stanford 110 2,523 1,075 123 218 42.61 20.5 11.6 2,268 806 98 201 64.46 23.1 11.3
UCLA 123 2,821 1,257 124 166 44.56 22.8 17.0 2,599 1,009 105 230 61.18 24.8 11.3
Arizona 124 2,796 1,208 105 206 43.21 26.6 13.6 2,629 1,041 103 200 60.40 25.5 13.1
Arizona St. 115 2,504 1,085 98 165 43.33 25.6 15.2 2,422 986 84 225 59.29 28.8 10.8
Oregon 112 2,509 1,050 111 213 41.85 22.6 11.8 2,427 961 122 193 60.40 19.9 12.6
Washington St. 114 2,529 1,109 155 195 43.85 16.3 13.0 2,457 1,037 87 215 57.79 28.2 11.4
Colorado 124 2,730 1,135 121 284 41.58 22.6 9.6 2,697 1,096 147 216 59.36 18.3 12.5
Utah 118 2,465 951 132 239 38.58 18.7 10.3 2,657 1,159 133 190 56.38 20.0 14.0
California 111 2,164 801 87 145 37.02 24.9 14.9 2,386 1,041 166 219 56.37 14.4 10.9
Oregon St. 108 2,217 803 104 170 36.22 21.3 13.0 2,507 1,112 126 201 55.64 19.9 12.5
Conference Average 117 2,592 1,102 127 212 42.24 21.2 12.6 2,478 980 113 212 60.57 22.9 11.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Pac-12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

84.13

2015-10-09 Boulder, Colo.
Colorado
Southern California
2
3
25
21
27
29
29
27
16
25
7
15
GAME

81.40

2015-11-22 Tucson, Ariz.
Arizona
UCLA
3
2
25
22
29
27
25
27
21
25
15
10
GAME

81.39

2015-10-04 Los Angeles, Calif.
Southern California
Washington
3
1
25
16
22
25
25
21
33
31
GAME

80.92

2015-10-02 Eugene, Oregon
Oregon
Colorado
2
3
25
20
25
22
25
27
23
25
12
15
GAME

80.40

2015-10-18 Los Angeles, Calif.
Southern California
Arizona
3
1
29
27
25
22
26
28
25
14
GAME

79.86

2015-09-27 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
Southern California
2
3
24
26
25
19
25
20
17
25
13
15
GAME

79.34

2015-10-23 Eugene, Oregon
Oregon
UCLA
1
3
22
25
25
19
26
28
27
29
GAME

79.15

2015-10-02 Los Angeles, Calif.
UCLA
Washington
0
3
29
31
16
25
15
25
GAME

79.08

2015-11-27 Los Angeles, Calif.
UCLA
Stanford
2
3
18
25
25
22
25
20
21
25
11
15
GAME

78.76

2015-11-25 Corvallis, Ore.
Oregon St.
Arizona
3
1
25
23
27
29
25
19
25
22

HuskerGeek Pac-12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 35.5506
2 30.6580
3 26.9476
4 25.5789
5 25.2697
6 23.6520
7 22.5254
8 21.9467
9 21.8867
10 21.7311

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 23.5182
2 17.6219
3 17.2154
4 16.0994
5 14.9887
6 14.9285
7 14.5003
8 14.3284
9 13.7760
10 13.6503

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.0256
2 17.4660
3 16.7155
4 16.0135
5 15.3199
6 14.7362
7 13.4426
8 13.3343
9 13.0040
10 12.5512

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2735
2 0.2472
3 0.2325
4 0.2173
5 0.2141
6 0.2065
7 0.2012
8 0.1992
9 0.1987
10 0.1925

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1809
2 0.1464
3 0.1421
4 0.1388
5 0.1361
6 0.1315
7 0.1313
8 0.1276
9 0.1272
10 0.1270

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1464
2 0.1445
3 0.1430
4 0.1420
5 0.1348
6 0.1344
7 0.1160
8 0.1097
9 0.1084
10 0.1076


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek