Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Pac-12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Stanford 1,804.9913 1,736.3308 1,770.3282 55.86 72.73 0.293
2nd Washington 1,779.6510 1,706.5040 1,742.6938 54.81 70.52 0.245
3rd UCLA 1,764.2719 1,691.2072 1,727.3533 53.01 71.48 0.240
4th Oregon 1,757.7870 1,677.6695 1,717.2611 53.13 70.57 0.249
5th Arizona 1,735.0140 1,659.2844 1,696.7267 50.82 69.93 0.199
6th Southern California 1,725.7423 1,656.4301 1,690.7311 51.33 69.34 0.201
7th Washington St. 1,727.8610 1,640.8372 1,683.7870 51.27 68.82 0.213
8th Utah 1,719.3630 1,639.8928 1,679.1578 50.44 69.36 0.203
9th Colorado 1,695.6445 1,613.3054 1,653.9626 49.52 67.71 0.179
10th Oregon St. 1,668.0099 1,593.0037 1,630.0754 50.33 63.68 0.140
11th Arizona St. 1,633.8156 1,578.1437 1,605.7384 43.01 66.92 0.092
12th California 1,610.6458 1,536.5746 1,573.1743 44.44 64.09 0.075

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Stanford 0.3633 46.76 10.43 43.29 42.32 4.02 5.96
2nd Oregon 0.3542 46.17 10.75 43.23 41.18 3.92 6.75
3rd Washington 0.3417 44.89 10.72 41.22 43.72 3.43 7.74
4th Utah 0.3295 45.63 12.68 42.58 42.50 4.38 6.77
5th UCLA 0.3242 42.97 10.54 40.38 45.58 4.78 6.00
6th Southern California 0.3182 44.52 12.70 41.14 42.64 5.46 6.13
7th Arizona 0.3105 43.70 12.66 40.50 43.58 4.49 6.80
8th Colorado 0.3016 41.72 11.56 38.76 45.11 5.65 5.61
9th Washington St. 0.2945 43.66 14.22 40.18 43.29 4.96 6.59
10th Oregon St. 0.2728 39.24 11.95 35.91 48.45 5.07 6.54
11th Arizona St. 0.2612 40.80 14.69 38.07 43.90 5.94 5.62
12th California 0.2598 41.46 15.48 39.08 42.26 6.06 4.77

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Stanford 0.0700 27.73 20.73 26.55 54.22 10.14 4.00
2nd Washington St. 0.0815 29.48 21.33 28.01 50.11 10.18 3.49
3rd UCLA 0.0844 26.26 17.82 25.12 59.58 6.79 3.59
4th Washington 0.0970 29.02 19.32 27.88 54.10 8.70 3.14
5th Oregon 0.1049 28.22 17.73 26.43 55.94 7.59 3.54
6th Arizona 0.1110 28.26 17.16 26.72 57.05 6.76 3.48
7th Southern California 0.1172 29.32 17.60 27.75 54.90 7.47 3.86
8th Colorado 0.1222 30.81 18.59 29.09 51.90 7.49 3.70
9th Utah 0.1268 30.57 17.89 28.96 53.24 7.12 2.66
10th Oregon St. 0.1328 30.90 17.62 29.36 53.31 7.35 4.19
11th Arizona St. 0.1694 33.90 16.95 32.44 50.88 6.94 3.54
12th California 0.1844 34.86 16.42 33.02 50.45 5.93 4.14

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,680.9158 1,682.7487 1,684.8819 1,686.9377 1,683.8710
Difference 1.8329 3.9661 6.0219 3.9403

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Washington 118 2,747 1,275 172 212 46.41 16.0 13.0 2,389 882 87 200 63.08 27.5 11.9
Stanford 129 2,972 1,341 121 182 45.12 24.6 16.3 2,591 941 119 180 63.68 21.8 14.4
UCLA 128 2,947 1,298 128 199 44.05 23.0 14.8 2,652 976 112 202 63.20 23.7 13.1
Oregon 117 2,558 1,134 134 233 44.33 19.1 11.0 2,298 858 97 190 62.66 23.7 12.1
Arizona 133 2,821 1,186 154 286 42.04 18.3 9.9 2,656 1,014 115 239 61.82 23.1 11.1
Washington St. 128 2,790 1,196 143 234 42.87 19.5 11.9 2,627 1,025 108 237 60.98 24.3 11.1
Utah 128 2,858 1,197 146 239 41.88 19.6 12.0 2,718 1,050 88 175 61.37 30.9 15.5
Southern California 121 2,752 1,160 120 226 42.15 22.9 12.2 2,621 1,025 120 262 60.89 21.8 10.0
Colorado 121 2,580 1,051 105 179 40.74 24.6 14.4 2,586 1,052 113 196 59.32 22.9 13.2
Oregon St. 116 2,450 1,034 118 197 42.20 20.8 12.4 2,505 1,098 122 172 56.17 20.5 14.6
Arizona St. 120 2,439 868 106 266 35.59 23.0 9.2 2,637 1,075 116 267 59.23 22.7 9.9
California 109 2,293 845 76 155 36.85 30.2 14.8 2,522 1,092 123 204 56.70 20.5 12.4
Conference Average 122 2,684 1,132 127 217 42.02 21.8 12.7 2,567 1,007 110 210 60.76 23.6 12.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Pac-12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

83.97

2016-10-12 Eugene, Ore.
Oregon
UCLA
2
3
28
26
23
25
20
25
25
21
9
15
GAME

82.99

2016-10-14 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
Arizona
1
3
21
25
26
28
27
25
21
25
GAME

82.12

2016-11-26 Los Angeles, Calif.
UCLA
Southern California
3
2
17
25
25
20
20
25
30
28
17
15
GAME

81.66

2016-10-21 Salt Lake City, Utah
Utah
Oregon
2
3
27
25
25
27
25
22
20
25
11
15
GAME

81.52

2016-10-23 Tucson, Ariz.
Arizona
Washington
1
3
24
26
25
23
26
28
20
25
GAME

81.52

2016-09-30 Boulder, Colo.
Colorado
Southern California
1
3
16
25
34
32
24
26
16
25
GAME

81.40

2016-10-14 Eugene, Ore.
Oregon
Southern California
1
3
30
28
22
25
20
25
21
25
GAME

81.13

2016-10-09 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
Utah
1
3
24
26
25
20
23
25
19
25
GAME

80.79

2016-09-28 Seattle, Wash.
Washington
Stanford
2
3
25
21
20
25
21
25
25
17
9
15
GAME

80.56

2016-10-29 Los Angeles, Calif.
UCLA
Utah
3
0
25
23
25
17
29
27

HuskerGeek Pac-12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 33.1813
2 27.8307
3 26.2448
4 24.9153
5 24.4605
6 23.6520
7 23.6315
8 23.3387
9 23.2426
10 23.1217

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.1429
2 16.3412
3 16.1792
4 16.1528
5 15.1611
6 14.0777
7 13.9866
8 13.9056
9 13.8808
10 13.6974

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.0292
2 20.6779
3 18.1858
4 16.7928
5 14.7980
6 14.5024
7 14.1670
8 14.0384
9 13.4415
10 13.4270

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2633
2 0.2224
3 0.2209
4 0.2188
5 0.2059
6 0.2021
7 0.1935
8 0.1898
9 0.1896
10 0.1892

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1519
2 0.1371
3 0.1285
4 0.1282
5 0.1267
6 0.1262
7 0.1223
8 0.1209
9 0.1167
10 0.1162

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1630
2 0.1624
3 0.1615
4 0.1486
5 0.1233
6 0.1232
7 0.1174
8 0.1170
9 0.1119
10 0.1114


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek