Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Patriot - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st American 1,387.6574 1,384.6289 1,386.1423 42.06 55.96 0.017
2nd Army West Point 1,359.9829 1,355.3261 1,357.6525 42.42 58.60 -0.003
3rd Colgate 1,339.1140 1,329.5826 1,334.3398 38.97 54.61 -0.064
4th Lehigh 1,304.0898 1,289.5478 1,296.7984 37.91 53.98 -0.090
5th Navy 1,278.9275 1,277.3040 1,278.1155 36.96 51.62 -0.102
6th Bucknell 1,227.0396 1,202.4740 1,214.6947 37.16 48.26 -0.134
7th Lafayette 1,178.4964 1,158.5873 1,168.4995 35.88 44.86 -0.175
8th Holy Cross 1,137.2316 1,128.1742 1,132.6939 31.84 45.34 -0.218

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st American 0.1974 35.92 16.18 31.94 49.66 6.14 5.49
2nd Army West Point 0.1770 32.69 14.99 30.77 53.41 5.42 5.96
3rd Colgate 0.1660 33.43 16.83 30.61 50.56 6.83 5.45
4th Navy 0.1503 33.17 18.14 31.18 50.55 6.45 4.70
5th Lehigh 0.1394 31.96 18.02 30.71 49.78 6.77 4.98
6th Bucknell 0.1287 29.50 16.63 27.55 56.21 6.38 4.44
7th Holy Cross 0.0777 25.02 17.25 22.58 61.45 6.64 4.68
8th Lafayette 0.0737 25.95 18.58 24.96 59.27 6.48 4.54

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Army West Point 0.1798 31.92 13.94 30.44 55.14 4.63 5.92
2nd American 0.1804 36.29 18.25 33.46 45.25 8.03 5.84
3rd Lehigh 0.2291 37.81 14.89 35.74 48.29 5.14 6.32
4th Colgate 0.2295 37.72 14.77 35.01 47.73 5.38 6.47
5th Lafayette 0.2487 39.38 14.52 37.20 46.96 3.53 9.00
6th Navy 0.2520 39.28 14.08 36.43 46.94 4.63 6.95
7th Bucknell 0.2625 41.57 15.32 38.03 42.29 5.43 8.04
8th Holy Cross 0.2954 42.74 13.20 39.72 43.54 3.97 8.06

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,271.1171 1,275.0167 1,280.9871 1,287.4569 1,278.6445
Difference 3.8997 9.8700 16.3399 10.0365

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
American 112 2,229 1,065 164 221 47.78 13.6 10.1 2,010 830 118 198 58.71 17.0 10.2
Lehigh 95 1,905 831 135 144 43.62 14.1 13.2 1,908 839 128 173 56.03 14.9 11.0
Colgate 115 2,279 983 157 189 43.13 14.5 12.1 2,326 1,030 151 245 55.72 15.4 9.5
Navy 99 1,841 790 124 184 42.91 14.8 10.0 1,931 878 142 176 54.53 13.6 11.0
Lafayette 101 1,841 831 126 153 45.14 14.6 12.0 1,963 959 182 181 51.15 10.8 10.8
Bucknell 107 2,139 937 124 204 43.81 17.3 10.5 2,275 1,087 185 221 52.22 12.3 10.3
Holy Cross 101 1,780 671 106 176 37.70 16.8 10.1 2,235 1,159 192 201 48.14 11.6 11.1
Conference Average 104 2,002 873 134 182 43.44 15.1 11.1 2,093 969 157 199 53.78 13.7 10.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Patriot

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

66.64

2012-11-18 Hamilton, N.Y.
Colgate
American
3
2
16
25
25
19
21
25
25
21
20
18
GAME

64.84

2012-10-12 Lewisburg, Pa.
Bucknell
American
1
3
23
25
25
13
28
30
27
29
GAME

62.94

2012-09-28 Annapolis, Md.
Navy
Lehigh
3
2
21
25
17
25
25
23
25
16
17
15
GAME

62.88

2012-09-29 Washington, D.C.
American
Lehigh
2
3
21
25
25
22
17
25
25
20
13
15
GAME

62.75

2012-10-05 Washington, D.C.
American
Navy
3
2
23
25
23
25
25
14
25
21
15
7
GAME

61.69

2012-11-09 Washington, D.C.
American
Colgate
3
1
25
18
24
26
25
15
25
16
GAME

60.75

2012-10-26 Annapolis, Md.
Navy
American
1
3
20
25
10
25
25
21
21
25
GAME

60.60

2012-10-25 Hamilton, N.Y.
Colgate
Bucknell
3
1
22
25
25
14
25
20
26
24
GAME

60.56

2012-10-20 Hamilton, N.Y.
Colgate
Lehigh
1
3
25
22
16
25
21
25
19
25
GAME

60.55

2012-10-13 Hamilton, N.Y.
Colgate
American
3
0
25
23
25
16
28
26

HuskerGeek Patriot All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 19.1665
2 15.3444
3 13.8017
4 13.6110
5 13.3611
6 12.8620
7 12.7930
8 11.3615
9 11.3170
10 11.0665

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.7023
2 9.2409
3 9.0881
4 8.5405
5 8.3159
6 7.2264
7 7.0407
8 6.9301
9 6.5393
10 5.9651

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.9402
2 12.5708
3 11.0845
4 10.1083
5 9.8486
6 9.7671
7 8.5136
8 7.4642
9 7.1587
10 7.1556

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1825
2 0.1704
3 0.1650
4 0.1531
5 0.1475
6 0.1454
7 0.1397
8 0.1284
9 0.1258
10 0.1235

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1141
2 0.1115
3 0.1054
4 0.0904
5 0.0874
6 0.0821
7 0.0733
8 0.0726
9 0.0710
10 0.0695

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1470
2 0.1186
3 0.1135
4 0.1123
5 0.1108
6 0.1075
7 0.1059
8 0.0821
9 0.0790
10 0.0787


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek