Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Peach Belt - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st S.C. Aiken 1,569.3433 1,555.1721 1,562.2416 48.28 63.65 0.106
2nd Augusta 1,547.0432 1,541.7730 1,544.4059 51.22 60.50 0.114
3rd Georgia College 1,516.7736 1,512.7373 1,514.7541 48.55 58.74 0.075
4th Lander 1,512.5363 1,497.5432 1,505.0210 48.05 59.61 0.068
5th Flagler 1,486.8506 1,481.6168 1,484.2314 45.44 59.23 0.045
6th Francis Marion 1,430.5510 1,423.4381 1,426.9901 43.18 56.23 -0.007
7th UNC Pembroke 1,365.7561 1,358.1590 1,361.9523 39.10 52.21 -0.093

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Augusta 0.2337 35.34 11.97 32.54 52.53 4.55 6.20
2nd S.C. Aiken 0.2282 36.76 13.94 34.73 50.65 4.64 5.01
3rd Flagler 0.2210 36.27 14.17 33.87 50.61 5.48 5.92
4th Lander 0.2191 35.12 13.21 33.20 53.35 3.54 5.32
5th Georgia College 0.2028 34.20 13.92 32.35 52.79 5.60 4.55
6th Francis Marion 0.1794 32.21 14.27 30.00 56.35 5.01 7.20
7th UNC Pembroke 0.1375 31.57 17.81 29.79 53.63 5.25 3.92

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Augusta 0.1195 29.45 17.50 27.80 54.74 6.12 6.71
2nd S.C. Aiken 0.1221 27.56 15.35 26.04 60.94 4.74 4.43
3rd Georgia College 0.1281 29.44 16.62 27.75 56.39 4.83 6.13
4th Lander 0.1510 30.19 15.09 28.29 55.94 5.07 6.44
5th Flagler 0.1764 35.16 17.52 32.45 50.38 5.11 6.36
6th Francis Marion 0.1863 34.54 15.91 32.73 51.61 4.93 6.64
7th UNC Pembroke 0.2307 37.18 14.11 34.97 48.66 4.37 6.89

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,485.6566 1,495.0805 1,501.3355 1,505.0210 1,496.7734
Difference 9.4239 15.6789 19.3644 14.8224

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Augusta 108 2,504 1,367 155 178 54.59 16.2 14.1 1,980 815 128 157 58.84 15.5 12.6
S.C. Aiken 96 2,271 1,107 120 125 48.75 18.9 18.2 1,919 735 78 128 61.70 24.6 15.0
Lander 104 2,385 1,183 138 118 49.60 17.3 20.2 2,076 860 130 146 58.57 16.0 14.2
Flagler 100 2,159 939 119 175 43.49 18.1 12.3 2,170 949 132 188 56.27 16.4 11.5
Georgia College 111 2,308 1,090 101 101 47.23 22.9 22.9 2,348 1,131 143 176 51.83 16.4 13.3
Francis Marion 104 2,207 970 161 176 43.95 13.7 12.5 2,258 1,024 141 179 54.65 16.0 12.6
UNC Pembroke 105 2,157 917 100 112 42.51 21.6 19.3 2,342 1,106 152 175 52.78 15.4 13.4
Conference Average 104 2,284 1,082 128 141 47.16 18.4 17.1 2,156 946 129 164 56.38 17.2 13.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Peach Belt

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.32

2018-10-05 Milledgeville, Ga.
Georgia College
S.C. Aiken
1
3
24
26
25
23
17
25
25
27
GAME

74.78

2018-10-27 Greenwood, S.C.
Lander
Flagler
3
1
31
33
25
21
26
24
25
17
GAME

74.36

2018-11-03 Aiken, S.C.
S.C. Aiken
Georgia College
3
1
23
25
25
17
25
21
26
24
GAME

73.45

2018-11-10 Greenwood, S.C.
Georgia College
S.C. Aiken
3
1
27
25
21
25
25
19
25
23
GAME

72.89

2018-11-03 Greenwood, S.C.
Lander
Augusta
3
2
25
14
20
25
21
25
28
26
15
6
GAME

72.83

2018-10-05 Augusta, Ga.
Augusta
Lander
1
3
27
25
15
25
21
25
22
25
GAME

72.40

2018-10-06 Augusta, Ga.
Augusta
S.C. Aiken
3
0
25
14
26
24
32
30
GAME

72.27

2018-09-21 Greenwood, S.C.
Lander
Francis Marion
3
2
19
25
25
23
25
16
24
26
15
6
GAME

72.18

2018-09-22 Milledgeville, Ga.
Georgia College
Flagler
2
3
21
25
19
25
27
25
25
17
13
15
GAME

71.67

2018-09-28 Florence, SC
Francis Marion
Georgia College
3
1
22
25
29
27
25
20
25
14

HuskerGeek Peach Belt All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.4636
2 24.0973
3 22.4134
4 22.0930
5 21.5222
6 20.6060
7 20.2893
8 20.0411
9 18.4820
10 18.4409

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.5716
2 13.2239
3 13.1445
4 13.0169
5 12.7336
6 12.4452
7 12.3874
8 11.2901
9 10.4061
10 9.9932

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 23.2966
2 18.3926
3 15.6184
4 15.1995
5 14.6190
6 13.3799
7 11.2392
8 10.8734
9 10.4734
10 10.0479

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2603
2 0.2317
3 0.2196
4 0.2155
5 0.2100
6 0.2008
7 0.2004
8 0.1988
9 0.1951
10 0.1856

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1601
2 0.1299
3 0.1272
4 0.1264
5 0.1245
6 0.1183
7 0.1129
8 0.1116
9 0.0999
10 0.0991

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2478
2 0.1769
3 0.1520
4 0.1407
5 0.1392
6 0.1338
7 0.1190
8 0.1046
9 0.1013
10 0.1005


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek