Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

RMAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Colorado Mines 1,567.3190 1,591.1657 1,579.1973 50.19 67.76 0.164
2nd MSU Denver 1,535.2274 1,561.0810 1,548.1003 49.80 64.82 0.130
3rd Colorado Mesa 1,527.9744 1,554.3468 1,541.1042 51.62 62.55 0.117
4th Regis (CO) 1,529.4697 1,551.9575 1,540.6726 49.81 63.74 0.119
5th UC-Colo. Springs 1,506.0704 1,520.5249 1,513.2804 47.06 63.32 0.082
6th Western N.M. 1,504.3398 1,513.2807 1,508.8037 48.69 61.83 0.108
7th Colorado St.-Pueblo 1,464.5558 1,489.8260 1,477.1368 46.96 58.45 0.080
8th Western St. 1,456.3483 1,483.2009 1,469.7133 45.77 59.54 0.065
9th Colo. Christian 1,455.8895 1,478.8402 1,467.3200 47.00 58.67 0.051
10th Chadron St. 1,447.5575 1,470.6508 1,459.0584 45.28 58.75 0.029
11th Adams St. 1,416.5761 1,439.2700 1,427.8779 42.73 57.79 -0.015
12th Westminster (UT) 1,405.5426 1,430.7676 1,418.0990 43.36 56.41 0.001
13th N.M. Highlands 1,385.0042 1,401.3363 1,393.1463 42.22 55.26 -0.010
14th Black Hills St. 1,388.2923 1,392.8929 1,390.5907 42.63 55.31 -0.001
15th South Dakota Mines 1,378.7696 1,393.0360 1,385.8845 41.73 54.94 -0.047
16th Fort Lewis 1,372.9433 1,394.0198 1,383.4415 43.95 53.80 -0.036

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Colorado Mines 0.2963 42.87 13.24 40.20 40.93 5.08 7.72
2nd MSU Denver 0.2728 41.43 14.15 38.70 43.55 4.01 8.51
3rd Regis (CO) 0.2458 38.90 14.32 36.11 45.67 5.61 7.80
4th UC-Colo. Springs 0.2271 37.54 14.83 34.71 47.74 5.07 7.12
5th Colorado St.-Pueblo 0.2240 37.64 15.24 35.26 47.10 5.73 5.46
6th Western N.M. 0.2239 37.15 14.76 34.90 48.63 5.13 6.40
7th Colorado Mesa 0.2228 39.37 17.09 36.64 44.57 5.86 6.52
8th Colo. Christian 0.2016 35.38 15.22 33.18 49.68 5.20 7.10
9th Chadron St. 0.1989 36.31 16.42 33.75 50.10 4.12 5.86
10th Western St. 0.1963 36.00 16.37 33.59 50.26 5.46 8.54
11th N.M. Highlands 0.1926 34.55 15.29 32.65 51.52 4.92 6.16
12th Westminster (UT) 0.1822 32.92 14.70 30.92 53.33 5.12 6.34
13th Black Hills St. 0.1699 31.71 14.73 29.64 57.34 4.87 5.53
14th Adams St. 0.1637 35.46 19.09 33.46 46.83 7.02 4.57
15th South Dakota Mines 0.1528 32.79 17.51 30.70 51.97 6.16 7.02
16th Fort Lewis 0.1480 29.99 15.19 27.77 55.55 5.01 6.72

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Colorado Mesa 0.1061 27.40 16.79 24.89 60.27 4.29 4.99
2nd Western N.M. 0.1159 29.29 17.70 27.15 56.20 5.06 4.25
3rd Regis (CO) 0.1264 28.78 16.14 26.57 57.79 5.08 3.77
4th Western St. 0.1311 29.40 16.29 27.03 56.35 5.87 5.96
5th Colorado Mines 0.1321 29.43 16.22 27.06 57.48 5.41 3.67
6th MSU Denver 0.1426 29.75 15.49 27.09 56.98 5.05 4.99
7th Colorado St.-Pueblo 0.1438 32.50 18.12 30.32 51.10 7.15 6.21
8th UC-Colo. Springs 0.1453 31.48 16.95 30.20 53.48 5.24 2.43
9th Colo. Christian 0.1506 30.38 15.33 28.07 55.47 5.31 5.79
10th Chadron St. 0.1703 32.40 15.37 30.24 52.15 5.25 6.66
11th Black Hills St. 0.1713 32.33 15.20 29.71 53.55 5.04 6.48
12th Adams St. 0.1783 34.54 16.71 32.53 49.92 6.23 5.25
13th Westminster (UT) 0.1815 33.80 15.65 31.78 52.38 5.04 5.90
14th Fort Lewis 0.1839 34.29 15.90 31.85 50.22 3.89 6.30
15th South Dakota Mines 0.1994 33.44 13.50 30.98 53.76 3.77 4.23
16th N.M. Highlands 0.2031 35.38 15.07 32.93 51.84 4.62 6.58

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,468.9642 1,467.1991 1,467.2336 1,467.5108 1,467.7269
Difference -1.7650 -1.7306 -1.4533 -1.6496

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Colorado St.-Pueblo 102 2,349 1,195 99 176 50.87 23.7 13.3 2,160 973 145 158 54.95 14.9 13.7
Western N.M. 101 2,282 1,045 124 150 45.79 18.4 15.2 2,118 876 98 138 58.64 21.6 15.3
Regis (CO) 114 2,281 1,034 163 230 45.33 14.0 9.9 2,134 876 111 188 58.95 19.2 11.4
MSU Denver 113 2,470 1,103 179 216 44.66 13.8 11.4 2,319 942 133 184 59.38 17.4 12.6
Colorado Mesa 122 2,399 1,107 137 157 46.14 17.5 15.3 2,271 958 159 222 57.82 14.3 10.2
UC-Colo. Springs 107 2,398 1,043 150 226 43.50 16.0 10.6 2,307 939 68 151 59.30 33.9 15.3
Colorado Mines 121 2,581 1,171 172 201 45.37 15.0 12.8 2,546 1,136 107 194 55.38 23.8 13.1
Colo. Christian 128 2,343 1,019 171 216 43.49 13.7 10.8 2,374 1,061 168 242 55.31 14.1 9.8
Chadron St. 95 1,982 839 95 132 42.33 20.9 15.0 2,063 919 153 194 55.45 13.5 10.6
Western St. 104 2,213 928 165 327 41.93 13.4 6.8 2,308 1,033 148 205 55.24 15.6 11.3
Adams St. 94 1,954 780 71 113 39.92 27.5 17.3 2,135 974 122 177 54.38 17.5 12.1
Westminster (UT) 97 1,966 792 105 139 40.29 18.7 14.1 2,178 1,021 142 167 53.12 15.3 13.0
Fort Lewis 88 1,847 769 110 118 41.64 16.8 15.7 2,055 1,001 139 174 51.29 14.8 11.8
N.M. Highlands 99 2,058 826 113 174 40.14 18.2 11.8 2,286 1,084 163 154 52.58 14.0 14.8
South Dakota Mines 93 1,881 736 118 173 39.13 15.9 10.9 2,151 1,026 97 149 52.30 22.2 14.4
Black Hills St. 90 1,800 704 78 152 39.11 23.1 11.8 2,090 1,008 143 158 51.77 14.6 13.2
Conference Average 104 2,175 943 128 181 43.10 17.9 12.7 2,218 989 131 178 55.37 17.9 12.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the RMAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.39

2015-11-21 Golden, Colo.
Colorado Mines
Colorado Mesa
3
2
26
28
25
27
25
22
25
20
15
9
GAME

72.38

2015-10-02 Chadron, NE
Chadron St.
Colorado St.-Pueblo
3
1
25
21
33
35
28
26
26
24
GAME

71.51

2015-10-09 Golden, Colo.
Colorado Mines
MSU Denver
0
3
23
25
22
25
26
28
GAME

71.45

2015-10-16 Chadron, NE
Chadron St.
Colorado Mines
1
3
31
29
19
25
19
25
24
26
GAME

71.16

2015-09-18 Silver City, N.M.
Western N.M.
Colorado St.-Pueblo
3
2
30
28
25
21
23
25
19
25
15
3
GAME

71.14

2015-11-07 Alamosa, Colo.
Adams St.
Western N.M.
2
3
25
22
19
25
14
25
25
23
15
17
GAME

71.08

2015-10-30 Golden, Colo.
Colorado Mines
Western N.M.
3
0
25
20
26
24
25
23
GAME

71.04

2015-10-03 Silver City, N.M.
Western N.M.
Colorado Mesa
3
0
30
28
25
12
25
23
GAME

70.82

2015-11-20 Golden, Colo.
Colorado Mesa
MSU Denver
3
1
25
18
25
14
24
26
25
22
GAME

70.79

2015-11-14 Silver City, N.M.
Western N.M.
N.M. Highlands
3
2
22
25
25
20
26
24
23
25
15
12

HuskerGeek RMAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.3107
2 22.8614
3 22.3708
4 22.0390
5 20.3196
6 19.9059
7 17.9662
8 17.5899
9 16.8303
10 16.7551

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.1269
2 13.7454
3 13.6305
4 13.1307
5 11.2536
6 11.2140
7 10.8486
8 10.7327
9 10.4008
10 10.3626

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.1537
2 15.1963
3 14.3377
4 14.1463
5 13.9971
6 13.9759
7 13.7028
8 13.0570
9 13.0462
10 12.8824

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2272
2 0.2095
3 0.2060
4 0.2034
5 0.1954
6 0.1889
7 0.1841
8 0.1779
9 0.1651
10 0.1645

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1375
2 0.1285
3 0.1127
4 0.1126
5 0.1085
6 0.1068
7 0.1052
8 0.1004
9 0.0984
10 0.0976

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1698
2 0.1540
3 0.1505
4 0.1379
5 0.1372
6 0.1371
7 0.1351
8 0.1315
9 0.1286
10 0.1262


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek