Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

RMAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Regis (CO) 1,684.9775 1,642.2829 1,663.4932 55.83 63.38 0.253
2nd MSU Denver 1,642.8083 1,602.6354 1,622.5975 54.70 62.71 0.190
3rd Colo. Sch. of Mines 1,637.2929 1,599.7679 1,618.4216 51.96 64.59 0.191
4th Dixie St. 1,594.5938 1,555.3640 1,574.8567 53.42 58.59 0.143
5th Colorado Mesa 1,571.9569 1,531.1379 1,551.4131 48.38 59.99 0.091
6th Colorado St.-Pueblo 1,535.6216 1,496.5602 1,515.9651 50.56 55.30 0.074
7th Colo. Christian 1,518.7149 1,480.3817 1,499.4258 49.35 55.58 0.063
8th UC-Colo. Springs 1,517.2028 1,478.1994 1,497.5741 48.39 55.12 0.066
9th Black Hills St. 1,508.2721 1,466.0662 1,487.0194 48.29 55.13 0.023
10th Adams St. 1,490.2225 1,455.1720 1,472.5930 49.09 51.97 0.034
11th Western Colo. 1,484.2599 1,447.0778 1,465.5509 49.96 52.55 0.016
12th South Dakota Mines 1,483.4835 1,447.6177 1,465.4409 48.02 54.38 0.019
13th Chadron St. 1,483.2541 1,447.6158 1,465.3266 51.98 52.93 0.036
14th Fort Lewis 1,459.9173 1,420.5405 1,440.0943 52.07 48.64 -0.007
15th Westminster (UT) 1,426.0479 1,388.0052 1,406.8980 49.20 46.63 -0.036
16th N.M. Highlands 1,407.2701 1,365.0369 1,385.9926 46.23 47.08 -0.046

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Regis (CO) 0.3303 44.45 11.42 41.59 43.19 4.16 7.81
2nd Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.3139 43.94 12.55 41.67 39.50 5.16 7.24
3rd MSU Denver 0.2735 40.39 13.04 37.49 46.35 3.49 9.14
4th Colorado Mesa 0.2659 41.45 14.85 38.65 41.14 6.19 6.28
5th UC-Colo. Springs 0.2517 38.88 13.71 36.79 45.83 4.94 7.75
6th Dixie St. 0.2509 38.58 13.49 35.33 47.09 5.10 9.95
7th Colorado St.-Pueblo 0.2267 36.05 13.39 33.65 52.20 4.35 8.21
8th South Dakota Mines 0.2171 34.07 12.36 31.74 51.06 5.39 7.05
9th Colo. Christian 0.2040 35.67 15.27 33.52 50.17 5.45 8.11
10th Chadron St. 0.2014 30.99 10.84 28.49 56.25 4.42 6.38
11th Black Hills St. 0.1888 33.95 15.08 31.68 51.93 5.47 7.96
12th Adams St. 0.1878 34.36 15.59 31.83 52.56 6.09 8.46
13th Westminster (UT) 0.1863 29.10 10.47 26.74 58.10 4.04 7.73
14th Western Colo. 0.1837 31.30 12.92 28.30 55.48 4.76 7.25
15th N.M. Highlands 0.1723 32.61 15.38 30.76 53.01 5.46 6.67
16th Fort Lewis 0.1698 30.29 13.31 27.56 56.66 4.83 7.83

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Regis (CO) 0.0777 26.54 18.77 24.13 56.68 7.26 6.45
2nd MSU Denver 0.0834 27.09 18.75 24.65 56.51 6.98 3.29
3rd Dixie St. 0.1078 28.73 17.95 26.96 54.35 7.13 6.20
4th Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.1233 29.03 16.71 27.42 56.62 5.82 4.90
5th Colo. Christian 0.1409 29.87 15.78 27.27 57.87 5.33 6.04
6th Colorado St.-Pueblo 0.1530 31.67 16.38 29.72 53.52 6.34 6.09
7th Adams St. 0.1538 33.33 17.95 31.40 51.95 6.13 7.19
8th Black Hills St. 0.1653 30.89 14.35 28.70 54.65 4.70 5.90
9th Chadron St. 0.1654 30.40 13.86 28.57 55.56 4.76 6.20
10th Western Colo. 0.1681 32.42 15.61 29.62 53.14 4.26 5.15
11th Colorado Mesa 0.1748 32.44 14.95 29.80 53.25 5.00 4.73
12th Fort Lewis 0.1770 33.32 15.62 30.40 50.43 4.46 7.10
13th UC-Colo. Springs 0.1858 34.42 15.84 32.63 51.54 5.67 5.80
14th South Dakota Mines 0.1981 33.85 14.04 31.02 51.34 5.03 6.24
15th N.M. Highlands 0.2179 35.80 14.00 32.60 49.01 4.29 8.37
16th Westminster (UT) 0.2219 34.94 12.75 32.49 50.73 3.25 7.60

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,508.2914 1,505.9412 1,504.4735 1,499.5166 1,504.5557
Difference -2.3502 -3.8180 -8.7749 -4.9810

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Regis (CO) 118 2,467 1,329 168 248 53.87 14.7 9.9 2,003 834 154 186 58.36 13.0 10.8
MSU Denver 107 2,364 1,202 199 239 50.85 11.9 9.9 2,010 830 78 170 58.71 25.8 11.8
Colo. Sch. of Mines 111 2,169 1,060 138 221 48.87 15.7 9.8 1,871 740 118 163 60.45 15.9 11.5
Dixie St. 102 2,224 1,126 194 167 50.63 11.5 13.3 1,990 913 137 152 54.12 14.5 13.1
Colorado Mesa 97 2,009 924 105 120 45.99 19.1 16.7 1,923 842 106 156 56.21 18.1 12.3
Colorado St.-Pueblo 111 2,442 1,197 174 204 49.02 14.0 12.0 2,350 1,123 155 214 52.21 15.2 11.0
Chadron St. 102 2,189 1,109 119 150 50.66 18.4 14.6 2,224 1,108 143 162 50.18 15.6 13.7
Western Colo. 96 2,019 990 130 159 49.03 15.5 12.7 2,100 1,058 111 172 49.62 18.9 12.2
Colo. Christian 101 2,129 989 145 222 46.45 14.7 9.6 2,205 1,070 140 159 51.47 15.8 13.9
Fort Lewis 104 2,076 1,081 137 140 52.07 15.2 14.8 2,309 1,255 177 173 45.65 13.0 13.3
Black Hills St. 106 2,230 1,025 145 128 45.96 15.4 17.4 2,329 1,134 147 171 51.31 15.8 13.6
South Dakota Mines 105 2,194 1,008 129 116 45.94 17.0 18.9 2,343 1,163 154 188 50.36 15.2 12.5
UC-Colo. Springs 103 2,081 943 138 232 45.32 15.1 9.0 2,141 1,055 139 180 50.72 15.4 11.9
Adams St. 101 2,069 988 146 131 47.75 14.2 15.8 2,213 1,155 172 156 47.81 12.9 14.2
Westminster (UT) 87 1,585 745 104 89 47.00 15.2 17.8 1,922 1,088 164 164 43.39 11.7 11.7
N.M. Highlands 93 1,773 795 98 185 44.84 18.1 9.6 2,204 1,252 194 156 43.19 11.4 14.1
Conference Average 103 2,126 1,032 142 172 48.39 15.4 13.2 2,134 1,039 143 170 51.49 15.5 12.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the RMAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.24

2019-11-08 Grand Junction, CO
Colorado Mesa
Colo. Sch. of Mines
2
3
21
25
29
27
26
28
25
21
10
15
GAME

77.05

2019-11-02 Golden, Colo.
Colo. Sch. of Mines
MSU Denver
3
2
28
26
22
25
25
20
22
25
15
10
GAME

76.37

2019-09-21
Chadron St.
Fort Lewis
3
0
28
26
28
26
25
21
GAME

75.61

2019-10-12 Spearfish, S.D.
Black Hills St.
Chadron St.
2
3
23
25
19
25
25
22
25
18
11
15
GAME

74.44

2019-09-21 Golden, Colo.
Colo. Sch. of Mines
Regis (CO)
0
3
25
27
17
25
22
25
GAME

73.87

2019-11-02 Spearfish, SD
Black Hills St.
Colo. Christian
3
2
25
22
12
25
23
25
26
24
15
11
GAME

73.58

2019-10-04
Chadron St.
Western Colo.
3
1
25
14
26
24
25
27
24
22
GAME

73.41

2019-10-12 St. George, Utah
Dixie St.
Colo. Sch. of Mines
3
2
21
25
25
15
25
23
20
25
15
11
GAME

73.15

2019-10-05 Golden, Colo.
Colo. Sch. of Mines
South Dakota Mines
2
3
25
18
25
14
25
27
20
25
15
17
GAME

72.53

2019-10-11
South Dakota Mines
Chadron St.
2
3
25
19
17
25
25
23
18
25
11
15

HuskerGeek RMAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.8876
2 23.5918
3 23.0755
4 20.7442
5 20.3751
6 19.7898
7 19.0350
8 18.3863
9 18.1465
10 17.9069

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.1654
2 14.6667
3 14.1949
4 13.3236
5 12.2447
6 11.5780
7 10.9625
8 9.4237
9 9.3907
10 9.1742

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 23.1971
2 19.1825
3 18.3610
4 17.1528
5 13.1833
6 12.8374
7 12.8107
8 12.5854
9 12.4827
10 12.4723

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2404
2 0.2383
3 0.2365
4 0.2063
5 0.2061
6 0.1957
7 0.1956
8 0.1951
9 0.1922
10 0.1885

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1725
2 0.1532
3 0.1479
4 0.1417
5 0.1317
6 0.1290
7 0.1092
8 0.1064
9 0.1059
10 0.1003

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2297
2 0.1818
3 0.1810
4 0.1787
5 0.1601
6 0.1430
7 0.1328
8 0.1322
9 0.1280
10 0.1268


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek