Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,724.7831
Football ohio st 10.8908
Ice Hockey michigan 5.0000
Men's Soccer marshall 10.0965
Women's Soccer penn st 9.9817
Women's Volleyball wisconsin 12.7753
Field Hockey northwestern 9.9036

RMAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st MSU Denver 1,705.4559 1,701.6708 1,703.5623 62.42 56.73 0.259
2nd Regis (CO) 1,695.1988 1,690.7205 1,692.9581 61.44 58.84 0.279
3rd Colorado Mesa 1,635.6527 1,633.4977 1,634.5748 57.17 59.22 0.184
4th CSU Pueblo 1,530.0974 1,524.5063 1,527.2993 53.46 52.41 0.082
5th Colo. Christian 1,520.0333 1,517.4066 1,518.7194 51.10 55.27 0.075
6th South Dakota Mines 1,511.4301 1,513.3828 1,512.4061 52.96 51.34 0.054
7th Colo. Sch. of Mines 1,503.7592 1,503.0941 1,503.4266 52.76 52.39 0.090
8th Chadron St. 1,494.1293 1,487.2173 1,490.6693 55.74 49.27 0.063
9th Westminster (UT) 1,490.0185 1,488.6637 1,489.3409 53.18 49.09 0.063
10th Fort Lewis 1,488.3312 1,488.4584 1,488.3948 54.98 51.10 0.053
11th UC-Colo. Springs 1,459.5491 1,461.4631 1,460.5058 54.94 49.22 0.056
12th Adams St. 1,408.0386 1,404.8530 1,406.4449 51.09 46.48 -0.015
13th Western Colo. 1,382.0830 1,376.1452 1,379.1109 49.35 46.25 -0.042
14th Black Hills St. 1,376.6819 1,376.5161 1,376.5990 50.26 45.11 -0.039
15th N.M. Highlands 1,330.2273 1,331.9604 1,331.0935 46.80 45.05 -0.084

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Regis (CO) 0.3268 45.55 12.87 40.44 38.37 4.39 7.87
2nd Colorado Mesa 0.3188 44.17 12.30 41.94 39.24 5.87 7.19
3rd MSU Denver 0.3095 43.96 13.01 40.14 40.45 3.39 9.66
4th Colo. Christian 0.2678 42.05 15.27 39.54 42.23 6.50 9.55
5th Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.2653 40.61 14.08 38.39 41.98 5.53 6.74
6th CSU Pueblo 0.2636 39.36 13.00 36.17 48.35 4.54 9.30
7th Chadron St. 0.2226 34.28 12.02 31.26 51.85 4.84 9.25
8th Westminster (UT) 0.2128 34.05 12.77 30.94 51.84 4.32 7.15
9th Adams St. 0.2031 33.52 13.21 30.24 48.69 3.78 6.80
10th South Dakota Mines 0.2022 33.11 12.90 29.89 50.29 4.30 10.67
11th UC-Colo. Springs 0.1975 36.22 16.47 32.86 47.27 6.83 9.61
12th Fort Lewis 0.1970 35.17 15.47 31.33 48.78 6.56 9.13
13th Western Colo. 0.1716 32.83 15.67 30.31 52.69 5.83 8.05
14th Black Hills St. 0.1618 31.93 15.75 28.94 51.80 5.33 8.70
15th N.M. Highlands 0.1419 31.51 17.32 29.65 52.30 5.40 7.28

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Regis (CO) 0.0478 24.93 20.15 22.63 56.73 8.54 6.03
2nd MSU Denver 0.0508 26.13 21.05 23.43 55.79 8.65 4.73
3rd Colorado Mesa 0.1351 30.27 16.77 28.73 54.23 4.92 4.21
4th UC-Colo. Springs 0.1418 33.32 19.14 30.60 49.46 5.55 6.63
5th Fort Lewis 0.1445 31.92 17.47 29.66 52.33 5.25 6.16
6th South Dakota Mines 0.1483 29.93 15.10 27.44 55.57 5.34 3.92
7th Westminster (UT) 0.1494 31.25 16.31 28.66 55.16 4.80 7.51
8th Chadron St. 0.1593 33.11 17.18 31.24 50.96 6.41 7.18
9th Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.1754 33.01 15.46 29.97 51.67 5.64 7.42
10th CSU Pueblo 0.1819 33.11 14.92 30.23 52.18 5.39 7.07
11th Colo. Christian 0.1931 34.28 14.96 31.38 49.74 5.55 6.15
12th Black Hills St. 0.2010 34.66 14.56 31.20 51.83 4.54 7.90
13th Western Colo. 0.2140 36.30 14.90 33.67 49.01 3.73 7.36
14th Adams St. 0.2177 37.30 15.54 33.28 42.33 5.36 6.39
15th N.M. Highlands 0.2261 37.01 14.40 32.99 47.34 4.17 9.44

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,501.0071 1,498.4962 1,491.8993 1,488.5786 1,494.9953
Difference -2.5109 -9.1077 -12.4285 -8.0157

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Colorado Mesa 51 1,168 633 68 65 54.20 17.2 18.0 985 434 51 85 55.94 19.3 11.6
Regis (CO) 46 1,056 579 69 86 54.83 15.3 12.3 872 402 62 88 53.90 14.1 9.9
MSU Denver 52 1,216 674 95 92 55.43 12.8 13.2 1,012 489 56 72 51.68 18.1 14.1
South Dakota Mines 50 1,104 576 107 97 52.17 10.3 11.4 1,051 535 48 83 49.10 21.9 12.7
CSU Pueblo 52 1,129 575 93 111 50.93 12.1 10.2 1,086 545 81 89 49.82 13.4 12.2
Fort Lewis 54 1,181 614 95 135 51.99 12.4 8.7 1,206 621 76 93 48.51 15.9 13.0
Colo. Christian 48 1,022 496 84 106 48.53 12.2 9.6 1,038 500 69 89 51.83 15.0 11.7
Chadron St. 48 1,044 552 80 74 52.87 13.1 14.1 1,061 565 87 108 46.75 12.2 9.8
Colo. Sch. of Mines 55 1,150 557 61 110 48.44 18.9 10.5 1,208 614 101 100 49.17 12.0 12.1
UC-Colo. Springs 48 977 498 83 114 50.97 11.8 8.6 1,070 583 81 74 45.51 13.2 14.5
Westminster (UT) 56 1,162 577 71 93 49.66 16.4 12.5 1,203 642 101 122 46.63 11.9 9.9
Adams St. 48 966 474 57 74 49.07 16.9 13.1 1,101 613 81 104 44.32 13.6 10.6
Black Hills St. 55 1,084 540 85 139 49.82 12.8 7.8 1,228 696 105 91 43.32 11.7 13.5
Western Colo. 54 1,044 493 75 120 47.22 13.9 8.7 1,261 700 99 102 44.49 12.7 12.4
N.M. Highlands 47 886 393 57 96 44.36 15.5 9.2 1,142 658 110 71 42.38 10.4 16.1
Conference Average 51 1,079 549 79 101 50.70 14.1 11.2 1,102 573 81 91 48.22 14.4 12.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the RMAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.45

 2023-09-23
N.M. Highlands
Regis (CO)
0
3
15
25
9
25
18
25
GAME

72.72

 2023-09-22
Colorado Mesa
MSU Denver
1
3
22
25
18
25
25
19
20
25
GAME

72.15

 2023-09-30
Colo. Christian
Colo. Sch. of Mines
2
3
25
21
26
24
23
25
22
25
13
15
GAME

71.98

 2023-09-02
Chadron St.
South Dakota Mines
1
3
21
25
22
25
25
23
23
25
GAME

71.76

 2023-09-23
South Dakota Mines
CSU Pueblo
3
2
25
19
17
25
25
21
17
25
15
12
GAME

70.75

 2023-09-15
Fort Lewis
Westminster (UT)
3
1
27
29
25
23
25
22
27
25
GAME

70.59

 2023-09-15
Colo. Sch. of Mines
Chadron St.
2
3
25
18
27
25
19
25
18
25
9
15
GAME

70.56

 2023-09-28
Colo. Christian
MSU Denver
1
3
27
25
11
25
9
25
20
25
GAME

69.75

 2023-09-23
Chadron St.
Fort Lewis
3
2
25
23
21
25
23
25
25
23
15
6
GAME

69.63

 2023-09-16
MSU Denver
Chadron St.
3
1
25
20
25
27
25
16
25
14

HuskerGeek RMAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
Riley Anderson MSU Denver A
Nadine Burbrink Regis (CO) A
Ember Canty MSU Denver A
Klaudia Sowizral Regis (CO) A
Halle Theis Regis (CO) A
Haley Kennedy Regis (CO) D
Mara LeGrand Regis (CO) S
Sabrina VanDeList Colorado Mesa S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
Hannah Kepler Regis (CO) A
Sydney Leffler Colorado Mesa A
Maddie Lindsay MSU Denver A
Emma Shaddix Colorado Mesa A
Maddy Williams MSU Denver A
Abbie McCrimmon MSU Denver D
Izzy Jones Colo. Christian S
Natalia Lambos Fort Lewis S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Mara LeGrand Regis (CO)
2 Sabrina VanDeList Colorado Mesa
3 Riley Anderson MSU Denver
4 Klaudia Sowizral Regis (CO)
5 Halle Theis Regis (CO)

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Riley Anderson MSU Denver
2 Klaudia Sowizral Regis (CO)
3 Halle Theis Regis (CO)
4 Hannah Kepler Regis (CO)
5 Nadine Burbrink Regis (CO)

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Mara LeGrand Regis (CO)
2 Sabrina VanDeList Colorado Mesa
3 Natalia Lambos Fort Lewis
4 Izzy Jones Colo. Christian
5 Amela Qershia MSU Denver

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Haley Kennedy Regis (CO)
2 Abbie McCrimmon MSU Denver
3 Allison Waller Colorado Mesa
4 Hannah Benes South Dakota Mines
5 Alondra Hernandez Chadron St.

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 Sabrina VanDeList Colorado Mesa 11.8575
2 Natalia Lambos Fort Lewis 9.7871
3 Sadie Scoville CSU Pueblo 9.6509
4 Presley Powell Colo. Sch. of Mines 8.5551
5 Haedyn Rhoades Black Hills St. 8.3538
6 Hannah Benes South Dakota Mines 8.2967
7 Mara LeGrand Regis (CO) 8.2877
8 Nur Turkmenoglu Western Colo. 8.2586
9 Izzy Jones Colo. Christian 8.1856
10 Abigail Renner Black Hills St. 7.5503

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 Sabrina VanDeList Colorado Mesa 7.6172
2 Sydney Leffler Colorado Mesa 6.2382
3 Izzy Jones Colo. Christian 6.0596
4 Natalia Lambos Fort Lewis 5.9518
5 Alessandra Meoni South Dakota Mines 5.7190
6 Nur Turkmenoglu Western Colo. 5.4381
7 Presley Powell Colo. Sch. of Mines 5.2596
8 Savannah Spitzer Colorado Mesa 5.2097
9 Klaudia Sowizral Regis (CO) 5.0998
10 Kendyl Kirkwood Chadron St. 4.9420

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 Haedyn Rhoades Black Hills St. 8.3287
2 Hannah Benes South Dakota Mines 6.9049
3 Jada Price Colo. Sch. of Mines 6.7800
4 Sarah Wilkey Fort Lewis 6.7251
5 Alondra Hernandez Chadron St. 6.1987
6 Allison Waller Colorado Mesa 6.1863
7 Elizabeth Rupprecht Western Colo. 5.7830
8 Abby Carlsen N.M. Highlands 5.7448
9 Abby Reardon Westminster (UT) 5.5904
10 Sadie Scoville CSU Pueblo 4.8918

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 Sabrina VanDeList Colorado Mesa 0.2325
2 Mara LeGrand Regis (CO) 0.2072
3 Natalia Lambos Fort Lewis 0.1957
4 Izzy Jones Colo. Christian 0.1904
5 Sadie Scoville CSU Pueblo 0.1856
6 Hannah Benes South Dakota Mines 0.1804
7 Riley Anderson MSU Denver 0.1771
8 Alexia Hurtado Chadron St. 0.1711
9 Kiley Metzger South Dakota Mines 0.1611
10 Abby Breeding Colo. Christian 0.1587

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 Sabrina VanDeList Colorado Mesa 0.1494
2 Izzy Jones Colo. Christian 0.1409
3 Klaudia Sowizral Regis (CO) 0.1244
4 Alessandra Meoni South Dakota Mines 0.1243
5 Sydney Leffler Colorado Mesa 0.1223
6 Hannah Kepler Regis (CO) 0.1219
7 Kendyl Kirkwood Chadron St. 0.1205
8 Mara LeGrand Regis (CO) 0.1203
9 Natalia Lambos Fort Lewis 0.1190
10 Riley Anderson MSU Denver 0.1122

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 Haedyn Rhoades Black Hills St. 0.1514
2 Alondra Hernandez Chadron St. 0.1512
3 Hannah Benes South Dakota Mines 0.1501
4 Abby Carlsen N.M. Highlands 0.1306
5 Sarah Wilkey Fort Lewis 0.1293
6 Allison Waller Colorado Mesa 0.1289
7 Jada Price Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.1233
8 Elizabeth Rupprecht Western Colo. 0.1091
9 Abby Reardon Westminster (UT) 0.1075
10 Haley Kennedy Regis (CO) 0.1043

Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
Rankings
Media
Nebraska
HuskerGeek 2023
HuskerGeek