Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Berry 1,441.9432 1,435.3180 1,438.6268 56.43 66.60 0.200
2nd Centre 1,388.7053 1,381.2677 1,384.9815 53.51 63.59 0.162
3rd Hendrix 1,381.7804 1,380.6733 1,381.2267 52.86 62.37 0.181
4th Millsaps 1,342.3054 1,332.2444 1,337.2654 52.02 60.40 0.079
5th Birmingham-So. 1,326.1434 1,329.8311 1,327.9860 52.41 59.51 0.100
6th Sewanee 1,316.2138 1,307.7445 1,311.9723 50.82 58.54 0.103
7th Oglethorpe 1,232.5998 1,226.1657 1,229.3785 45.11 54.92 -0.035
8th Rhodes 1,031.8331 1,039.0878 1,035.4541 40.22 50.26 -0.015

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Rhodes 0.3589 41.10 5.21 37.45 47.16 3.36 10.89
2nd Hendrix 0.2898 41.57 12.59 37.87 46.31 3.28 9.83
3rd Berry 0.2858 40.61 12.03 37.09 46.97 2.53 9.71
4th Centre 0.2345 37.34 13.89 33.35 52.75 3.54 8.19
5th Sewanee 0.2343 33.97 10.53 29.52 55.74 2.92 7.62
6th Millsaps 0.2079 34.67 13.88 31.27 52.44 2.93 9.19
7th Birmingham-So. 0.2008 36.62 16.54 33.90 51.03 3.85 11.39
8th Oglethorpe 0.1430 31.20 16.91 28.65 54.17 4.46 7.38

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Centre 0.0727 26.87 19.60 25.54 59.96 6.55 4.62
2nd Berry 0.0857 25.81 17.24 23.39 61.28 5.11 4.82
3rd Birmingham-So. 0.1007 27.49 17.43 24.93 60.94 5.85 5.12
4th Hendrix 0.1085 28.85 18.00 26.59 54.72 7.12 5.52
5th Millsaps 0.1293 28.96 16.03 26.44 59.13 4.93 5.42
6th Sewanee 0.1308 29.91 16.82 27.22 55.35 6.29 6.00
7th Oglethorpe 0.1784 34.78 16.93 32.37 52.18 5.02 7.30
8th Rhodes 0.3739 45.58 8.19 34.83 7.47 -0.32 5.16

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,305.8614 1,328.8017 1,339.6126 1,332.6257 1,326.7254
Difference 22.9403 33.7512 26.7643 27.8186

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Berry 114 2,531 1,245 179 193 49.19 14.1 13.1 2,247 932 133 146 58.52 16.9 15.4
Birmingham-So. 96 2,081 1,038 209 238 49.88 10.0 8.7 1,912 852 112 154 55.44 17.1 12.4
Centre 81 1,449 680 102 126 46.93 14.2 11.5 1,359 583 105 141 57.10 12.9 9.6
Hendrix 86 1,578 746 140 179 47.28 11.3 8.8 1,488 653 113 127 56.12 13.2 11.7
Millsaps 108 1,957 901 155 164 46.04 12.6 11.9 1,971 919 148 215 53.37 13.3 9.2
Sewanee 69 1,302 591 74 120 45.39 17.6 10.9 1,349 636 111 134 52.85 12.2 10.1
Oglethorpe 80 1,515 640 98 113 42.24 15.5 13.4 1,706 852 138 157 50.06 12.4 10.9
Conference Average 91 1,773 834 137 162 46.71 13.6 11.2 1,719 775 123 153 54.78 14.0 11.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

70.52

2013-11-08 Rome, Ga.
Centre
Sewanee
0
3
21
25
25
27
30
32
GAME

68.38

2013-10-19 Birmingham, Ala.
Birmingham-So.
Centre
1
3
26
28
25
19
28
30
22
25
GAME

65.81

2013-10-20 JACKSON, MS
Millsaps
Centre
1
3
22
25
15
25
25
23
26
28
GAME

65.72

2013-11-08 Rome, Ga.
Birmingham-So.
Millsaps
1
3
15
25
44
46
25
23
14
25
GAME

65.03

2013-10-05 Birmingham, Ala.
Birmingham-So.
Berry
3
2
25
18
23
25
25
23
17
25
15
12
GAME

64.95

2013-10-19 Rome, Ga.
Berry
Hendrix
3
1
25
16
25
17
19
25
25
20
GAME

64.53

2013-10-16 Sewanee, Tenn.
Sewanee
Centre
1
3
21
25
25
21
15
25
26
28
GAME

64.10

2013-10-12 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Millsaps
3
0
25
17
25
22
27
25
GAME

63.45

2013-10-20 Birmingham, Ala.
Birmingham-So.
Sewanee
3
2
25
21
25
19
23
25
20
25
15
10
GAME

63.38

2013-09-28 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Berry
0
3
19
25
20
25
23
25

HuskerGeek SAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.9211
2 20.1248
3 20.0186
4 17.0731
5 16.9928
6 15.1586
7 14.9085
8 13.1800
9 12.6235
10 11.8106

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.1416
2 9.3858
3 9.3162
4 9.2154
5 8.4925
6 7.6998
7 6.2522
8 6.2482
9 6.1361
10 5.7533

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.8533
2 12.6730
3 12.4782
4 12.3892
5 10.8085
6 10.8033
7 10.3467
8 9.4851
9 8.6578
10 8.5806

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2236
2 0.2122
3 0.2102
4 0.1924
5 0.1846
6 0.1808
7 0.1803
8 0.1768
9 0.1732
10 0.1675

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1402
2 0.1035
3 0.1027
4 0.1025
5 0.1008
6 0.0889
7 0.0879
8 0.0859
9 0.0853
10 0.0830

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2040
2 0.1642
3 0.1457
4 0.1419
5 0.1318
6 0.1201
7 0.1112
8 0.1075
9 0.1066
10 0.1045


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek