Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Hendrix 1,423.6193 1,419.0052 1,421.3104 55.16 65.88 0.208
2nd Berry 1,407.1511 1,407.9485 1,407.5497 54.50 64.19 0.168
3rd Millsaps 1,396.1460 1,396.7660 1,396.4560 55.73 63.22 0.153
4th Birmingham-So. 1,386.9282 1,382.2586 1,384.5914 54.24 62.17 0.139
5th Centre 1,313.2672 1,325.1759 1,319.2081 50.35 59.81 0.081
6th Sewanee 1,250.3664 1,271.1003 1,260.6907 48.30 55.74 0.029
7th Oglethorpe 1,257.8672 1,254.4022 1,256.1335 49.29 54.64 0.031

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Hendrix 0.2887 42.86 13.99 40.08 42.48 4.10 9.24
2nd Berry 0.2688 41.01 14.12 37.25 46.50 3.68 10.35
3rd Birmingham-So. 0.2358 37.10 13.52 34.14 51.77 4.24 10.75
4th Centre 0.2129 35.87 14.57 31.99 51.70 3.10 10.55
5th Millsaps 0.2108 34.44 13.36 31.77 53.93 2.90 8.21
6th Sewanee 0.1747 30.58 13.12 27.63 57.92 3.61 7.55
7th Oglethorpe 0.1669 31.10 14.41 27.96 57.30 3.97 9.16

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Millsaps 0.0575 21.78 16.03 20.52 67.06 3.72 3.16
2nd Hendrix 0.0805 25.54 17.48 23.48 59.80 6.49 5.88
3rd Birmingham-So. 0.0972 26.26 16.54 24.60 61.08 4.99 6.12
4th Berry 0.1010 27.10 17.00 24.60 59.71 5.24 4.66
5th Centre 0.1324 29.10 15.87 26.88 56.61 4.78 7.64
6th Oglethorpe 0.1362 29.13 15.51 26.84 58.05 3.59 6.51
7th Sewanee 0.1454 31.25 16.72 28.32 54.34 4.36 5.18

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,349.4200 1,353.6992 1,366.7518 1,384.5914 1,363.6156
Difference 4.2792 17.3319 35.1715 18.9275

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Hendrix 115 2,565 1,260 195 231 49.12 13.2 11.1 2,258 929 155 176 58.86 14.6 12.8
Millsaps 82 1,832 918 109 104 50.11 16.8 17.6 1,620 700 67 105 56.79 24.2 15.4
Birmingham-So. 121 2,525 1,259 238 216 49.86 10.6 11.7 2,304 1,013 174 202 56.03 13.2 11.4
Berry 105 2,324 1,073 174 202 46.17 13.4 11.5 2,264 1,004 144 196 55.65 15.7 11.6
Centre 99 1,874 834 171 230 44.50 11.0 8.1 1,930 902 181 201 53.26 10.7 9.6
Oglethorpe 89 1,790 838 147 127 46.82 12.2 14.1 1,933 986 144 156 48.99 13.4 12.4
Sewanee 81 1,473 626 81 123 42.50 18.2 12.0 1,693 862 125 157 49.08 13.5 10.8
Conference Average 99 2,055 973 159 176 47.01 13.6 12.3 2,000 914 141 170 54.10 15.0 12.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

68.61

2014-09-20 Rome, Ga.
Berry
Birmingham-So.
2
3
23
25
25
23
20
25
25
23
11
15
GAME

67.86

2014-11-08 Conway, Ark.
Birmingham-So.
Millsaps
3
1
26
24
25
16
21
25
25
20
GAME

67.80

2014-10-24 Birmingham, Ala.
Birmingham-So.
Berry
3
1
25
18
24
26
25
21
25
21
GAME

67.60

2014-10-12 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Millsaps
3
2
21
25
19
25
25
22
25
22
15
13
GAME

67.23

2014-09-27 Birmingham, Ala.
Birmingham-So.
Hendrix
3
1
21
25
25
19
25
16
28
26
GAME

65.74

2014-11-09 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Birmingham-So.
3
1
23
25
25
20
25
23
25
17
GAME

65.08

2014-09-20 Danville, Ky.
Centre
Hendrix
2
3
20
25
25
23
26
28
26
24
8
15
GAME

64.91

2014-10-10 Danville, Ky.
Centre
Berry
1
3
16
25
18
25
25
23
26
28
GAME

64.76

2014-10-04 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Berry
3
1
18
25
25
19
25
20
25
20
GAME

64.58

2014-10-25
Millsaps
Berry
3
1
22
25
25
17
25
17
25
18

HuskerGeek SAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.0417
2 22.5981
3 21.0595
4 20.2331
5 17.2010
6 17.0627
7 16.5945
8 16.0920
9 16.0080
10 15.9247

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.0015
2 12.1008
3 11.4145
4 10.2312
5 9.9760
6 9.6366
7 9.2928
8 9.0629
9 8.2377
10 8.1940

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.5416
2 15.4891
3 13.5426
4 13.4295
5 12.8218
6 11.9409
7 11.8297
8 11.5772
9 11.3697
10 11.1835

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2273
2 0.2186
3 0.2132
4 0.2081
5 0.2006
6 0.1942
7 0.1806
8 0.1775
9 0.1695
10 0.1670

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1461
2 0.1163
3 0.1100
4 0.1077
5 0.0999
6 0.0950
7 0.0921
8 0.0884
9 0.0880
10 0.0828

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1806
2 0.1504
3 0.1439
4 0.1412
5 0.1307
6 0.1301
7 0.1279
8 0.1233
9 0.1221
10 0.1202


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek