Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Hendrix 1,453.7645 1,488.2637 1,470.9130 57.39 66.60 0.235
2nd Birmingham-So. 1,443.8122 1,483.5444 1,463.5435 58.30 63.48 0.190
3rd Berry 1,446.1241 1,470.3180 1,458.1709 53.97 66.25 0.190
4th Millsaps 1,370.2325 1,419.0675 1,394.4362 55.20 59.97 0.113
5th Centre 1,347.1399 1,387.7111 1,367.2750 52.85 60.15 0.088
6th Rhodes 1,283.8142 1,334.9339 1,309.1246 51.65 55.95 0.066
7th Sewanee 1,245.3731 1,281.2768 1,263.1974 47.86 54.99 0.009
8th Oglethorpe 1,134.8721 1,209.0513 1,171.3747 43.87 48.99 -0.082

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Birmingham-So. 0.2632 37.40 11.08 34.98 50.73 3.19 9.65
2nd Berry 0.2600 39.12 13.12 36.14 49.24 3.39 8.52
3rd Hendrix 0.2582 39.07 13.25 36.51 47.84 4.08 10.12
4th Centre 0.2157 35.64 14.07 32.44 52.16 3.61 7.29
5th Millsaps 0.1981 34.68 14.87 31.85 55.84 3.91 8.97
6th Rhodes 0.1870 35.11 16.41 31.75 51.86 3.84 10.37
7th Sewanee 0.1595 29.76 13.80 25.27 56.70 3.11 7.69
8th Oglethorpe 0.1232 29.16 16.84 26.09 57.59 4.98 8.28

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Hendrix 0.0231 21.09 18.79 19.80 64.39 6.41 4.90
2nd Berry 0.0698 26.04 19.06 24.44 58.42 7.80 5.55
3rd Birmingham-So. 0.0734 24.91 17.57 23.83 62.44 5.16 6.33
4th Millsaps 0.0847 23.84 15.37 22.12 65.81 3.63 5.48
5th Rhodes 0.1208 28.59 16.50 26.54 57.47 5.29 6.57
6th Centre 0.1276 29.14 16.38 27.53 57.20 4.20 5.77
7th Sewanee 0.1503 31.32 16.29 28.21 53.81 4.24 5.89
8th Oglethorpe 0.2052 36.37 15.84 33.15 49.73 3.93 10.59

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,362.2544 1,375.9579 1,382.2517 1,380.8556 1,375.3299
Difference 13.7035 19.9973 18.6012 17.4340

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Birmingham-So. 112 2,572 1,344 191 165 52.26 13.5 15.6 2,211 954 156 192 56.85 14.2 11.5
Berry 120 2,426 1,169 174 218 48.19 13.9 11.1 2,179 896 161 230 58.88 13.5 9.5
Hendrix 135 3,053 1,490 230 299 48.80 13.3 10.2 2,745 1,162 156 225 57.67 17.6 12.2
Millsaps 92 1,812 903 136 116 49.83 13.3 15.6 1,726 819 116 149 52.55 14.9 11.6
Centre 101 1,806 861 112 148 47.67 16.1 12.2 1,770 822 131 149 53.56 13.5 11.9
Rhodes 104 2,062 1,005 220 195 48.74 9.4 10.6 2,100 1,049 145 150 50.05 14.5 14.0
Sewanee 83 1,463 666 116 115 45.52 12.6 12.7 1,601 815 117 149 49.09 13.7 10.7
Oglethorpe 99 1,859 847 197 180 45.56 9.4 10.3 2,193 1,213 243 200 44.69 9.0 11.0
Conference Average 106 2,132 1,036 172 180 48.32 12.7 12.3 2,066 966 153 181 52.92 13.9 11.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.69

2015-10-10 Birmingham, Ala.
Birmingham-So.
Hendrix
2
3
23
25
19
25
25
17
25
22
12
15
GAME

68.80

2015-10-03 Rome, Ga.
Berry
Hendrix
1
3
26
28
26
24
16
25
22
25
GAME

68.26

2015-10-11 Jackson, Miss.
Millsaps
Hendrix
2
3
25
22
25
21
19
25
23
25
13
15
GAME

68.21

2015-11-08 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Birmingham-So.
3
1
25
23
19
25
25
20
25
23
GAME

68.05

2015-10-25 Rome, Ga.
Berry
Birmingham-So.
3
2
21
25
25
14
21
25
25
21
17
15
GAME

67.12

2015-10-04 Danville, KY
Centre
Birmingham-So.
1
3
22
25
23
25
26
24
22
25
GAME

66.83

2015-11-07 Conway, Ark.
Berry
Birmingham-So.
1
3
19
25
25
19
18
25
18
25
GAME

66.35

2015-11-13 Mount Berry, Ga.
Berry
Hendrix
2
3
25
18
17
25
25
22
16
25
11
15
GAME

65.98

2015-10-03 Sewanee, Tenn.
Sewanee
Birmingham-So.
2
3
27
25
24
26
10
25
25
23
13
15
GAME

65.02

2015-10-16 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Berry
0
3
22
25
23
25
13
25

HuskerGeek SAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.7334
2 20.0127
3 20.0108
4 19.7834
5 17.7776
6 17.7024
7 16.5312
8 16.3737
9 16.3697
10 15.1003

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.1233
2 12.9925
3 11.6342
4 11.1143
5 10.8285
6 10.1620
7 9.9327
8 9.8960
9 8.3474
10 8.1888

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.3491
2 16.7721
3 16.7442
4 13.8006
5 13.7316
6 12.5132
7 12.2649
8 11.8764
9 8.7473
10 8.6749

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1996
2 0.1959
3 0.1945
4 0.1819
5 0.1799
6 0.1777
7 0.1685
8 0.1671
9 0.1640
10 0.1605

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1375
2 0.1286
3 0.1239
4 0.1187
5 0.1031
6 0.1010
7 0.0980
8 0.0881
9 0.0839
10 0.0814

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1654
2 0.1628
3 0.1526
4 0.1508
5 0.1504
6 0.1363
7 0.1197
8 0.1131
9 0.1111
10 0.1070


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek