Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Berry 1,522.3767 1,520.3875 1,521.3818 56.86 69.17 0.242
2nd Birmingham-So. 1,508.4908 1,520.9035 1,514.6844 58.59 65.21 0.236
3rd Hendrix 1,430.0010 1,443.7036 1,436.8360 53.66 62.18 0.151
4th Sewanee 1,411.3841 1,424.8569 1,418.1045 53.14 60.91 0.127
5th Rhodes 1,332.3204 1,346.4205 1,339.3519 49.93 56.61 0.063
6th Centre 1,282.5870 1,299.1229 1,290.8285 49.17 52.48 0.000
7th Millsaps 1,282.0715 1,299.3268 1,290.6703 47.04 55.93 0.047
8th Oglethorpe 1,286.0339 1,295.0685 1,290.5433 46.52 55.03 0.036

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Berry 0.2880 40.51 11.71 36.90 47.76 2.52 10.75
2nd Birmingham-So. 0.2809 40.24 12.16 37.17 45.63 3.42 9.94
3rd Hendrix 0.2367 37.39 13.72 34.20 48.65 4.36 8.88
4th Sewanee 0.2349 38.31 14.83 35.30 47.83 3.75 10.69
5th Rhodes 0.2007 34.61 14.54 32.38 53.56 4.78 10.18
6th Oglethorpe 0.1935 34.21 14.86 31.18 53.76 3.34 10.86
7th Millsaps 0.1707 33.38 16.31 30.86 54.49 3.89 8.77
8th Centre 0.1207 29.78 17.71 27.38 57.97 2.65 9.28

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Birmingham-So. 0.0448 21.89 17.41 20.03 64.26 6.06 4.59
2nd Berry 0.0463 23.44 18.81 22.18 61.42 7.34 4.40
3rd Hendrix 0.0862 25.84 17.23 24.66 60.80 5.30 5.03
4th Sewanee 0.1080 27.24 16.44 25.41 59.92 4.44 6.63
5th Centre 0.1206 29.80 17.75 28.07 53.98 3.98 6.97
6th Millsaps 0.1240 28.13 15.73 26.85 59.89 5.15 5.87
7th Rhodes 0.1373 29.32 15.59 27.98 57.48 4.64 6.91
8th Oglethorpe 0.1579 34.10 18.31 31.58 50.98 6.44 7.04

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,387.8001 1,381.7459 1,371.2802 1,378.7282 1,379.8886
Difference -6.0542 -16.5199 -9.0719 -10.5486

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Berry 104 2,304 1,158 194 250 50.26 11.9 9.2 1,907 742 128 188 61.09 14.9 10.1
Birmingham-So. 109 2,560 1,344 192 229 52.50 13.3 11.2 2,143 895 125 164 58.24 17.1 13.1
Sewanee 100 2,230 1,122 199 174 50.31 11.2 12.8 2,012 889 156 181 55.82 12.9 11.1
Hendrix 90 2,006 986 136 155 49.15 14.8 12.9 1,857 817 116 126 56.00 16.0 14.7
Rhodes 107 2,265 1,082 197 144 47.77 11.5 15.7 2,276 1,087 177 197 52.24 12.9 11.6
Millsaps 85 1,713 748 125 157 43.67 13.7 10.9 1,873 924 132 139 50.67 14.2 13.5
Centre 96 1,819 819 131 137 45.03 13.9 13.3 2,087 1,103 172 194 47.15 12.1 10.8
Oglethorpe 103 2,033 869 184 309 42.75 11.0 6.6 2,329 1,189 187 177 48.95 12.5 13.2
Conference Average 99 2,116 1,016 170 194 47.68 12.7 11.6 2,061 956 149 171 53.77 14.1 12.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.41

2018-10-21 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Sewanee
2
3
22
25
24
26
27
25
25
21
12
15
GAME

70.02

2018-09-21 Mount Berry, Ga.
Berry
Birmingham-So.
3
2
25
23
19
25
19
25
25
22
15
12
GAME

69.79

2018-09-16 Birmingham, Ala.
Birmingham-So.
Hendrix
1
3
22
25
23
25
27
25
23
25
GAME

68.76

2018-11-04 Mount Berry, Ga.
Berry
Birmingham-So.
3
0
25
23
26
24
25
15
GAME

68.71

2018-11-02 Mount Berry, Ga.
Rhodes
Sewanee
2
3
16
25
25
17
29
27
21
25
19
21
GAME

67.91

2018-09-29 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Berry
0
3
31
33
20
25
15
25
GAME

66.73

2018-10-07 Memphis, Tenn.
Rhodes
Birmingham-So.
2
3
30
28
25
19
15
25
18
25
6
15
GAME

66.42

2018-10-06 Mount Berry, Ga.
Berry
Sewanee
3
1
25
20
14
25
25
20
25
21
GAME

66.27

2018-11-03 Mount Berry, Ga.
Berry
Sewanee
3
2
24
26
15
25
25
14
25
20
15
7
GAME

65.97

2018-09-22 Sewanee, Tenn.
Sewanee
Hendrix
2
3
25
20
23
25
12
25
25
21
14
16

HuskerGeek SAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.2970
2 20.5683
3 19.9953
4 19.0114
5 17.6944
6 17.1434
7 16.6571
8 15.8091
9 15.4736
10 15.4566

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.3197
2 10.7805
3 10.3331
4 10.1723
5 9.5037
6 8.7792
7 8.4542
8 7.8668
9 7.6904
10 7.6034

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.6438
2 16.4547
3 15.6495
4 14.6115
5 13.2406
6 12.7014
7 12.2332
8 11.5165
9 10.5075
10 10.0910

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2477
2 0.2040
3 0.1959
4 0.1940
5 0.1882
6 0.1682
7 0.1662
8 0.1654
9 0.1617
10 0.1557

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1211
2 0.1198
3 0.1155
4 0.1099
5 0.0970
6 0.0966
7 0.0878
8 0.0874
9 0.0871
10 0.0821

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1782
2 0.1581
3 0.1570
4 0.1510
5 0.1488
6 0.1315
7 0.1280
8 0.1210
9 0.1130
10 0.1045


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek