Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Birmingham-So. 1,351.7994 1,349.9571 1,350.8779 53.79 52.89 -0.019
2nd Berry 1,319.5460 1,318.1514 1,318.8485 53.83 52.62 -0.030
3rd Sewanee 1,308.8925 1,307.2430 1,308.0675 65.79 46.39 -0.069
4th Oglethorpe 1,261.2501 1,259.2727 1,260.2610 47.18 57.14 -0.078
5th Hendrix 1,248.6022 1,247.5155 1,248.0587 48.17 54.14 -0.085
6th Millsaps 1,199.3231 1,198.1679 1,198.7454 49.32 46.02 -0.162
7th Rhodes 1,165.7911 1,164.4256 1,165.1082 50.90 46.54 -0.147
8th Centre 1,137.4531 1,136.0297 1,136.7412 49.49 44.92 -0.222

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Berry 0.2398 28.94 4.96 25.23 56.40 2.33 6.46
2nd Hendrix 0.2186 26.65 4.79 25.08 61.15 4.16 3.20
3rd Birmingham-So. 0.2175 30.77 9.02 28.45 49.07 4.18 3.89
4th Oglethorpe 0.2141 26.93 5.52 24.83 58.23 3.01 4.02
5th Rhodes 0.1799 26.57 8.59 24.58 56.89 4.71 3.99
6th Sewanee 0.1794 29.46 11.52 27.50 54.06 6.39 10.54
7th Millsaps 0.1653 24.38 7.85 21.81 58.51 3.45 3.61
8th Centre 0.1144 21.89 10.45 20.79 61.65 5.40 3.10

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Birmingham-So. 0.2369 34.16 10.47 31.75 51.57 7.05 7.95
2nd Sewanee 0.2486 35.55 10.69 29.91 54.04 3.52 6.93
3rd Berry 0.2696 34.31 7.34 30.39 50.24 5.42 8.35
4th Oglethorpe 0.2920 38.55 9.35 36.00 47.67 6.18 11.58
5th Hendrix 0.3033 37.46 7.13 34.88 50.27 5.56 8.79
6th Rhodes 0.3273 40.90 8.17 37.16 44.67 5.40 11.35
7th Millsaps 0.3277 39.37 6.61 36.40 47.36 5.65 10.41
8th Centre 0.3360 42.69 9.09 40.66 45.78 5.70 9.65

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,248.3385 1,249.8482 1,253.7832 1,254.1599 1,251.5324
Difference 1.5097 5.4446 5.8213 4.2585

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Berry 33 785 430 70 88 54.78 11.2 8.9 678 320 31 57 52.80 21.9 11.9
Birmingham-So. 46 1,037 550 70 90 53.04 14.8 11.5 895 427 45 76 52.29 19.9 11.8
Oglethorpe 38 843 408 54 48 48.40 15.6 17.6 784 342 62 76 56.38 12.6 10.3
Hendrix 47 1,037 500 60 75 48.22 17.3 13.8 1,020 480 61 68 52.94 16.7 15.0
Rhodes 47 952 474 59 84 49.79 16.1 11.3 1,054 567 85 96 46.21 12.4 11.0
Millsaps 45 904 439 54 87 48.56 16.7 10.4 990 541 72 83 45.35 13.8 11.9
Sewanee 15 294 163 29 32 55.44 10.1 9.2 353 220 29 36 37.68 12.2 9.8
Centre 40 800 388 46 73 48.50 17.4 11.0 961 534 63 90 44.43 15.3 10.7
Conference Average 39 832 419 55 72 50.84 14.9 11.7 842 429 56 73 48.51 15.6 11.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

62.77

2021-04-17
Berry
Hendrix
3
1
25
23
20
25
25
18
25
21
GAME

62.65

2021-03-27 Birmingham, Ala.
Birmingham-So.
Hendrix
1
3
25
22
17
25
21
25
23
25
GAME

62.02

2021-04-10
Birmingham-So.
Millsaps
2
3
25
20
25
16
15
25
20
25
13
15
GAME

60.73

2021-03-13 Atlanta, Ga.
Oglethorpe
Rhodes
2
3
25
22
20
25
26
24
21
25
11
15
GAME

60.43

2021-03-13
Berry
Hendrix
3
1
25
16
21
25
25
20
24
20
GAME

59.40

2021-03-21 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Oglethorpe
3
1
25
23
26
24
15
25
25
22
GAME

59.02

2021-04-17 Rome, GA
Birmingham-So.
Oglethorpe
3
0
25
21
25
21
25
18
GAME

58.60

2021-03-21 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Oglethorpe
0
3
22
25
18
25
22
25
GAME

58.36

2021-04-18
Berry
Birmingham-So.
0
3
18
25
21
25
18
25
GAME

57.77

2021-03-07
Millsaps
Berry
1
3
22
25
10
25
25
21
19
25

HuskerGeek SAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 10.4358
2 8.9194
3 8.2007
4 7.8906
5 7.8227
6 7.3180
7 7.2511
8 7.0329
9 6.2551
10 5.9576

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 5.9866
2 4.8239
3 4.0331
4 3.9254
5 3.8361
6 3.3784
7 3.3499
8 3.0832
9 3.0590
10 2.9775

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 8.4370
2 7.0853
3 6.9758
4 6.9659
5 6.0401
6 5.6570
7 5.6119
8 5.2722
9 4.6660
10 4.3420

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2220
2 0.2131
3 0.2027
4 0.2018
5 0.1853
6 0.1753
7 0.1745
8 0.1664
9 0.1591
10 0.1576

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1361
2 0.1026
3 0.0907
4 0.0882
5 0.0872
6 0.0858
7 0.0852
8 0.0835
9 0.0830
10 0.0805

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2114
2 0.1795
3 0.1714
4 0.1514
5 0.1508
6 0.1401
7 0.1387
8 0.1342
9 0.1194
10 0.1092


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek