Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Berry 1,609.8339 1,599.6896 1,604.7537 63.13 58.66 0.296
2nd Birmingham-So. 1,482.1223 1,464.1987 1,473.1332 59.23 56.07 0.192
3rd Hendrix 1,463.7673 1,460.2211 1,461.9931 57.48 55.05 0.130
4th Oglethorpe 1,442.6243 1,436.0554 1,439.3361 54.31 52.92 0.104
5th Centre 1,437.3864 1,438.5603 1,437.9733 60.74 52.85 0.087
6th Sewanee 1,438.6797 1,427.1258 1,432.8911 59.85 50.52 0.106
7th Millsaps 1,414.3582 1,413.0016 1,413.6797 58.35 48.46 0.084
8th Rhodes 1,396.9619 1,394.1244 1,395.5424 56.06 48.24 0.082

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Berry 0.3212 42.99 10.87 39.22 44.24 3.03 10.00
2nd Birmingham-So. 0.2771 40.59 12.88 37.78 43.03 3.92 9.52
3rd Hendrix 0.2249 37.02 14.53 33.99 49.78 3.82 9.74
4th Sewanee 0.2230 35.03 12.72 32.29 51.50 2.88 9.76
5th Oglethorpe 0.2071 36.01 15.30 33.39 50.54 3.68 8.82
6th Rhodes 0.2017 36.37 16.19 33.42 48.73 4.18 10.81
7th Centre 0.1865 34.81 16.16 32.52 51.13 4.44 9.36
8th Millsaps 0.1642 31.33 14.91 28.91 55.73 3.08 9.12

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Berry 0.0248 21.13 18.65 19.26 63.90 6.75 5.02
2nd Millsaps 0.0800 25.93 17.93 24.38 58.12 4.99 6.90
3rd Birmingham-So. 0.0851 26.18 17.67 24.10 57.09 5.97 6.60
4th Hendrix 0.0944 27.40 17.96 25.50 59.25 5.93 6.04
5th Centre 0.0997 27.19 17.22 25.45 59.89 3.56 6.42
6th Oglethorpe 0.1027 28.20 17.93 26.54 56.44 7.05 8.41
7th Sewanee 0.1168 27.67 15.99 25.42 59.26 3.95 7.51
8th Rhodes 0.1201 28.78 16.77 25.40 56.03 5.63 8.92

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,457.4128 1,443.1678 1,443.0484 1,438.6547 1,445.5709
Difference -14.2451 -14.3644 -18.7582 -15.7892

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Berry 112 1,565 887 218 288 56.68 7.2 5.4 1,238 565 120 179 54.36 10.3 6.9
Birmingham-So. 102 1,944 1,050 168 210 54.01 11.6 9.3 1,767 860 149 175 51.33 11.9 10.1
Centre 98 1,763 982 168 201 55.70 10.5 8.8 1,710 885 153 203 48.25 11.2 8.4
Hendrix 96 1,504 782 168 186 52.00 9.0 8.1 1,448 726 131 197 49.86 11.1 7.4
Sewanee 83 1,536 824 140 136 53.65 11.0 11.3 1,574 862 147 176 45.24 10.7 8.9
Millsaps 88 1,707 922 163 177 54.01 10.5 9.6 1,750 965 134 188 44.86 13.1 9.3
Oglethorpe 96 1,629 796 149 152 48.86 10.9 10.7 1,666 848 173 209 49.10 9.6 8.0
Rhodes 87 1,640 824 152 150 50.24 10.8 10.9 1,786 1,020 183 166 42.89 9.8 10.8
Conference Average 95 1,661 883 166 188 53.14 10.2 9.3 1,617 841 149 187 48.24 10.9 8.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

79.58

2021-10-09
Birmingham-So.
Berry
2
3
20
25
25
20
25
20
22
25
24
26
GAME

73.20

2021-10-06
Berry
Oglethorpe
3
2
25
12
24
26
25
18
23
25
17
15
GAME

72.34

2021-10-28
Centre
Sewanee
3
2
14
25
25
19
29
27
14
25
17
15
GAME

72.12

2021-10-31
Centre
Rhodes
2
3
27
29
24
26
25
19
25
20
12
15
GAME

69.76

2021-10-30
Sewanee
Rhodes
3
2
30
28
21
25
25
14
24
26
15
10
GAME

69.21

2021-10-09
Centre
Hendrix
3
1
25
23
18
25
25
23
29
27
GAME

69.14

2021-10-22
Berry
Sewanee
3
1
25
16
23
25
25
17
25
14
GAME

68.56

2021-09-26 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Birmingham-So.
0
3
22
25
20
25
23
25
GAME

68.33

2021-10-03 Atlanta, GA
Oglethorpe
Hendrix
2
3
20
25
22
25
29
27
25
19
8
15
GAME

68.24

2021-09-19
Berry
Birmingham-So.
1
3
19
25
23
25
25
9
21
25

HuskerGeek SAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 16.9745
2 13.1479
3 12.8018
4 12.7212
5 12.6890
6 12.6315
7 12.5579
8 12.4321
9 12.4091
10 12.1586

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.1091
2 8.6483
3 8.2856
4 7.4687
5 7.0504
6 6.8004
7 6.7193
8 6.6325
9 5.4918
10 5.4874

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.8503
2 12.6912
3 11.6778
4 11.6283
5 11.5231
6 11.1120
7 8.5324
8 8.3925
9 8.3906
10 8.0403

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2122
2 0.1894
3 0.1856
4 0.1778
5 0.1754
6 0.1730
7 0.1678
8 0.1674
9 0.1659
10 0.1647

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1418
2 0.1389
3 0.1295
4 0.1085
5 0.0990
6 0.0983
7 0.0946
8 0.0922
9 0.0872
10 0.0801

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1894
2 0.1691
3 0.1615
4 0.1499
5 0.1462
6 0.1423
7 0.1374
8 0.1165
9 0.1154
10 0.1094


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek