Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Berry 1,605.5406 1,606.3858 1,605.9631 65.33 59.81 0.308
2nd Birmingham-So. 1,495.0260 1,497.0527 1,496.0390 60.84 55.93 0.196
3rd Centre 1,470.9894 1,472.4051 1,471.6971 60.95 52.70 0.165
4th Oglethorpe 1,436.0503 1,436.8523 1,436.4513 56.07 55.12 0.124
5th Hendrix 1,431.0248 1,436.9212 1,433.9700 56.30 52.50 0.110
6th Sewanee 1,389.2942 1,385.5331 1,387.4123 61.40 48.44 0.101
7th Millsaps 1,383.9425 1,384.1299 1,384.0362 56.63 47.11 0.078
8th Rhodes 1,341.2969 1,344.2216 1,342.7585 55.28 46.26 0.063

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Berry 0.3286 42.48 9.62 38.93 44.38 2.71 10.69
2nd Birmingham-So. 0.2644 40.77 14.33 37.62 45.66 5.41 9.09
3rd Centre 0.2332 37.90 14.58 33.68 44.55 4.14 10.22
4th Hendrix 0.2316 37.16 14.00 33.26 45.47 4.71 9.49
5th Oglethorpe 0.2292 37.16 14.25 34.49 50.92 3.67 10.18
6th Sewanee 0.2063 32.23 11.60 29.30 55.11 2.97 10.81
7th Rhodes 0.2047 35.72 15.25 32.57 47.52 3.94 9.42
8th Millsaps 0.1620 32.26 16.06 29.15 53.06 3.63 9.18

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Berry 0.0211 21.52 19.42 19.58 61.45 6.68 5.90
2nd Birmingham-So. 0.0680 25.64 18.84 23.78 58.74 6.50 5.87
3rd Centre 0.0685 24.12 17.27 21.85 60.74 3.86 6.80
4th Millsaps 0.0836 25.40 17.03 22.63 61.26 5.10 8.27
5th Oglethorpe 0.1049 26.94 16.45 25.51 61.14 4.01 7.02
6th Sewanee 0.1054 28.12 17.58 26.20 55.49 4.42 8.76
7th Hendrix 0.1212 27.34 15.21 24.86 56.46 5.10 6.31
8th Rhodes 0.1413 30.96 16.83 28.52 51.33 5.17 7.80

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,444.7909 1,434.9343 1,432.3827 1,435.2106 1,436.8296
Difference -9.8566 -12.4083 -9.5803 -10.6151

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Berry 105 2,390 1,394 195 208 58.33 12.3 11.5 1,891 879 132 159 53.52 14.3 11.9
Birmingham-So. 110 2,342 1,285 166 200 54.87 14.1 11.7 2,195 1,108 150 186 49.52 14.6 11.8
Centre 107 2,404 1,341 196 242 55.78 12.3 9.9 2,220 1,158 167 215 47.84 13.3 10.3
Sewanee 100 2,077 1,171 179 166 56.38 11.6 12.5 2,224 1,251 199 169 43.75 11.2 13.2
Oglethorpe 101 2,145 1,085 179 160 50.58 12.0 13.4 2,147 1,085 168 182 49.46 12.8 11.8
Hendrix 81 1,685 883 136 138 52.40 12.4 12.2 1,640 868 113 155 47.07 14.5 10.6
Millsaps 87 1,744 911 127 173 52.24 13.7 10.1 1,857 1,066 173 199 42.60 10.7 9.3
Rhodes 92 1,860 953 140 141 51.24 13.3 13.2 2,066 1,210 171 140 41.43 12.1 14.8
Conference Average 98 2,081 1,128 165 179 53.98 12.7 11.8 2,030 1,078 159 176 46.90 12.9 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.86

2022-11-06
Berry
Birmingham-So.
3
2
23
25
25
20
25
20
25
27
15
11
GAME

74.19

2022-10-08
Berry
Centre
2
3
23
25
24
26
25
21
25
20
11
15
GAME

73.42

2022-10-22
Birmingham-So.
Berry
2
3
26
24
25
21
18
25
18
25
14
16
GAME

69.12

2022-09-14
Berry
Oglethorpe
3
1
25
10
25
22
21
25
25
23
GAME

69.04

2022-10-07 Atlanta, GA
Oglethorpe
Centre
3
2
22
25
25
16
25
19
21
25
19
17
GAME

68.55

2022-10-23
Birmingham-So.
Oglethorpe
2
3
25
22
25
10
20
25
22
25
9
15
GAME

68.17

2022-10-07
Berry
Sewanee
3
0
25
22
25
20
25
20
GAME

67.69

2022-10-02 Conway, Ark.
Hendrix
Oglethorpe
3
1
25
19
25
19
21
25
26
24
GAME

67.41

2022-09-24 Atlanta, GA
Oglethorpe
Birmingham-So.
1
3
17
25
25
20
23
25
18
25
GAME

67.37

2022-11-05 Rome, GA
Birmingham-So.
Centre
3
1
25
23
25
22
12
25
25
23

HuskerGeek SAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 21.4809
2 21.4267
3 18.9461
4 18.9095
5 18.3744
6 18.1292
7 18.0744
8 15.9087
9 15.7096
10 13.9045

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.3438
2 11.9374
3 10.9712
4 10.0841
5 8.8309
6 8.6939
7 8.5935
8 7.1279
9 6.9290
10 6.8682

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.0064
2 17.2312
3 15.6525
4 13.1994
5 11.9092
6 10.6342
7 10.5887
8 10.4555
9 10.3160
10 10.1925

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2238
2 0.2143
3 0.1974
4 0.1949
5 0.1918
6 0.1819
7 0.1801
8 0.1739
9 0.1705
10 0.1689

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1390
2 0.1147
3 0.1126
4 0.1097
5 0.1059
6 0.1008
7 0.0942
8 0.0935
9 0.0818
10 0.0810

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1876
2 0.1706
3 0.1505
4 0.1470
5 0.1419
6 0.1358
7 0.1236
8 0.1235
9 0.1195
10 0.1096


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek