Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wingate 1,578.7521 1,579.3073 1,579.0297 54.68 58.83 0.177
2nd Anderson (SC) 1,517.8842 1,525.1299 1,521.5027 52.75 56.64 0.099
3rd Carson-Newman 1,511.2157 1,513.7447 1,512.4797 51.01 56.75 0.076
4th Tusculum 1,466.6343 1,469.8216 1,468.2271 47.10 55.68 0.049
5th Lenoir-Rhyne 1,467.6649 1,467.9947 1,467.8298 53.26 50.64 0.034
6th Mars Hill 1,457.1097 1,460.2349 1,458.6715 52.73 50.08 0.034
7th Newberry 1,406.9648 1,409.4138 1,408.1888 50.61 47.35 -0.020
8th Limestone 1,376.6896 1,378.4831 1,377.5860 49.19 45.96 -0.067
9th Catawba 1,355.1250 1,351.9497 1,353.5365 47.72 43.99 -0.085
10th Lincoln Memorial 1,337.5985 1,341.9247 1,339.7599 49.08 42.76 -0.104
11th Emory & Henry 1,278.3253 1,278.0667 1,278.1960 44.98 40.47 -0.133
12th UVA Wise 1,272.9902 1,271.7724 1,272.3811 62.84 60.20 -0.203
13th Coker 1,241.3385 1,243.4070 1,242.3723 48.06 36.93 -0.202

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wingate 0.2829 40.71 12.42 38.05 45.80 4.04 8.39
2nd Anderson (SC) 0.2558 39.13 13.55 36.42 46.72 5.05 6.79
3rd Carson-Newman 0.2207 36.76 14.69 34.50 47.93 5.61 7.38
4th Tusculum 0.2107 35.96 14.89 33.58 49.95 5.01 6.05
5th Lenoir-Rhyne 0.2095 35.49 14.54 32.31 51.29 4.59 8.39
6th Mars Hill 0.1841 31.03 12.62 28.66 56.78 4.75 3.89
7th Newberry 0.1827 32.89 14.62 29.97 50.57 5.23 7.12
8th UVA Wise 0.1519 26.70 11.52 23.99 58.22 5.33 5.76
9th Limestone 0.1428 29.64 15.36 27.53 53.68 5.81 5.43
10th Lincoln Memorial 0.1315 30.31 17.15 28.53 53.56 5.18 5.62
11th Catawba 0.1209 30.96 18.87 29.24 53.12 5.63 7.85
12th Emory & Henry 0.0990 29.01 19.11 27.68 57.52 5.52 6.02
13th Coker 0.0686 24.70 17.84 23.33 60.61 5.73 6.58

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wingate 0.1060 28.21 17.61 26.54 56.32 7.40 6.94
2nd Carson-Newman 0.1450 31.43 16.94 29.44 52.71 5.12 6.21
3rd Mars Hill 0.1496 31.08 16.12 28.86 54.26 5.31 7.89
4th Anderson (SC) 0.1566 32.80 17.14 29.75 52.32 6.53 5.58
5th Tusculum 0.1613 32.73 16.59 29.68 52.32 5.24 6.49
6th Lenoir-Rhyne 0.1756 32.50 14.94 29.95 51.37 4.98 5.26
7th Newberry 0.2025 34.96 14.70 31.02 49.23 5.36 7.89
8th Catawba 0.2055 35.74 15.19 32.38 50.53 4.75 9.15
9th Limestone 0.2095 34.36 13.41 31.52 51.80 4.19 6.83
10th Emory & Henry 0.2324 38.09 14.85 35.21 46.70 5.18 9.46
11th Lincoln Memorial 0.2353 38.00 14.47 35.19 45.72 4.31 9.04
12th Coker 0.2704 41.11 14.07 38.46 43.77 4.87 10.98
13th UVA Wise 0.3548 39.68 4.20 36.50 48.18 4.33 8.97

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,406.1355 1,405.3054 1,407.1639 1,410.5428 1,407.2869
Difference -0.8301 1.0284 4.4073 1.5352

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wingate 119 2,782 1,519 242 291 54.60 11.5 9.6 2,164 878 146 232 59.43 14.8 9.3
Carson-Newman 115 2,585 1,329 194 218 51.41 13.3 11.9 2,243 950 129 201 57.65 17.4 11.2
Anderson (SC) 106 2,350 1,235 169 170 52.55 13.9 13.8 2,015 878 112 137 56.43 18.0 14.7
Mars Hill 99 2,238 1,222 96 100 54.60 23.3 22.4 2,012 967 146 164 51.94 13.8 12.3
Lenoir-Rhyne 95 2,112 1,139 196 215 53.93 10.8 9.8 1,907 917 93 160 51.91 20.5 11.9
Tusculum 93 2,014 948 125 204 47.07 16.1 9.9 1,909 845 110 161 55.74 17.4 11.9
Newberry 102 2,131 1,109 165 203 52.04 12.9 10.5 2,107 1,093 163 204 48.13 12.9 10.3
Limestone 86 1,793 913 109 150 50.92 16.4 12.0 1,822 954 108 163 47.64 16.9 11.2
Lincoln Memorial 104 2,075 1,044 120 152 50.31 17.3 13.7 2,326 1,298 198 223 44.20 11.7 10.4
Catawba 86 1,708 823 133 185 48.19 12.8 9.2 1,936 1,074 166 191 44.53 11.7 10.1
Emory & Henry 93 1,755 824 114 221 46.95 15.4 7.9 2,192 1,274 184 158 41.88 11.9 13.9
Coker 83 1,492 748 107 103 50.13 13.9 14.5 1,963 1,211 211 179 38.31 9.3 11.0
Conference Average 98 2,086 1,071 148 184 51.06 14.8 12.1 2,050 1,028 147 181 49.81 14.7 11.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.77

2022-10-11
Mars Hill
Anderson (SC)
1
3
19
25
25
22
17
25
26
28
GAME

72.08

2022-11-11 Rock Hill, SC
Wingate
Anderson (SC)
3
1
22
25
25
22
25
18
25
13
GAME

72.03

2022-11-07
Mars Hill
Anderson (SC)
1
3
23
25
25
13
20
25
19
25
GAME

72.00

2022-10-14 Wingate, N.C.
Wingate
Carson-Newman
3
1
25
20
25
17
22
25
29
27
GAME

71.99

2022-10-22
Lenoir-Rhyne
Wingate
1
3
20
25
25
23
32
34
9
25
GAME

71.96

2022-10-28 Anderson, S.C.
Anderson (SC)
Wingate
3
2
25
23
20
25
21
25
25
15
17
15
GAME

71.66

2022-10-04
Mars Hill
Tusculum
3
2
25
22
19
25
26
24
18
25
15
12
GAME

69.84

2022-09-09 Wingate, N.C.
Wingate
Anderson (SC)
3
1
23
25
25
15
25
22
28
26
GAME

69.76

2022-09-06 Greeneville, Tenn.
Tusculum
Mars Hill
2
3
25
23
25
22
22
25
25
27
7
15
GAME

69.32

2022-09-30
Lenoir-Rhyne
Mars Hill
3
1
24
26
25
20
25
19
25
22

HuskerGeek SAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.3246
2 24.8760
3 22.6599
4 20.8570
5 20.8556
6 17.7474
7 17.1827
8 16.4081
9 15.7672
10 15.7425

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.3605
2 15.6851
3 12.8895
4 11.6943
5 11.4635
6 10.8425
7 10.0729
8 9.6773
9 9.4731
10 8.9894

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.3226
2 13.8382
3 13.8332
4 12.5472
5 11.9514
6 11.2233
7 10.9870
8 10.9641
9 10.7841
10 10.6806

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2554
2 0.2336
3 0.2221
4 0.2150
5 0.2138
6 0.2107
7 0.1900
8 0.1849
9 0.1803
10 0.1763

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1529
2 0.1435
3 0.1400
4 0.1329
5 0.1191
6 0.1181
7 0.1170
8 0.1038
9 0.0999
10 0.0978

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1700
2 0.1667
3 0.1609
4 0.1476
5 0.1220
6 0.1148
7 0.1128
8 0.1112
9 0.1107
10 0.1088


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek