Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Colorado Col. 1,505.5930 1,499.7250 1,502.6561 59.96 70.71 0.274
2nd Trinity (TX) 1,501.4489 1,499.9493 1,500.6989 59.31 69.85 0.281
3rd Southwestern (TX) 1,467.9039 1,460.3681 1,464.1311 58.92 67.14 0.223
4th Texas Lutheran 1,392.2935 1,397.6694 1,394.9788 56.42 61.43 0.153
5th Dallas 1,329.9231 1,351.1891 1,340.5139 52.01 58.87 0.089
6th Austin 1,322.7713 1,333.4677 1,328.1087 49.94 60.19 0.092
7th Centenary (LA) 1,191.2437 1,197.3938 1,194.3148 46.34 50.43 -0.046

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Trinity (TX) 0.3177 42.29 10.52 38.28 46.79 2.54 9.26
2nd Colorado Col. 0.3129 42.47 11.18 38.97 46.86 2.83 10.18
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.2660 37.91 11.31 34.29 50.69 3.03 9.01
4th Austin 0.2247 36.11 13.64 33.16 50.66 3.68 8.24
5th Texas Lutheran 0.2168 36.35 14.67 33.16 48.76 3.73 9.59
6th Dallas 0.1877 33.22 14.45 29.92 54.17 3.52 10.61
7th Centenary (LA) 0.1519 31.63 16.45 29.33 53.10 5.24 11.43

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Trinity (TX) 0.0367 22.70 19.03 21.31 63.14 7.15 5.05
2nd Colorado Col. 0.0391 22.97 19.07 21.59 63.77 6.08 4.06
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.0426 21.02 16.76 19.95 67.28 4.70 2.70
4th Texas Lutheran 0.0635 23.28 16.93 21.86 65.01 4.64 5.46
5th Dallas 0.0984 26.68 16.85 25.19 60.90 4.55 6.23
6th Austin 0.1323 29.55 16.32 28.04 56.91 5.17 6.91
7th Centenary (LA) 0.1975 34.16 14.42 31.32 56.43 4.19 7.98

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,389.3432 1,405.6863 1,399.8746 1,394.9788 1,397.4707
Difference 16.3431 10.5314 5.6356 10.8367

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Colorado Col. 126 2,727 1,375 218 209 50.42 12.5 13.0 2,278 896 129 179 60.67 17.7 12.7
Trinity (TX) 155 3,290 1,649 220 212 50.12 15.0 15.5 2,790 1,120 200 237 59.86 14.0 11.8
Southwestern (TX) 142 2,557 1,253 198 188 49.00 12.9 13.6 2,305 994 122 213 56.88 18.9 10.8
Texas Lutheran 111 2,020 980 167 158 48.52 12.1 12.8 1,986 941 152 156 52.62 13.1 12.7
Dallas 98 1,773 855 178 135 48.22 10.0 13.1 1,782 866 150 169 51.40 11.9 10.5
Austin 127 2,374 1,049 166 150 44.19 14.3 15.8 2,532 1,212 217 215 52.13 11.7 11.8
Centenary (LA) 96 1,447 567 141 212 39.19 10.3 6.8 1,996 1,149 210 156 42.44 9.5 12.8
Conference Average 122 2,313 1,104 184 181 47.09 12.4 13.0 2,238 1,025 169 189 53.71 13.8 11.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.63

2013-11-16
Trinity (TX)
Southwestern (TX)
3
2
24
26
23
25
25
20
25
20
21
19
GAME

70.86

2013-09-20 Kerrville, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
2
3
17
25
24
26
28
26
25
21
13
15
GAME

69.66

2013-10-27 Sherman, Texas
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
1
3
18
25
17
25
27
25
22
25
GAME

69.52

2013-09-28 Georgetown, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Colorado Col.
1
3
14
25
18
25
25
20
23
25
GAME

68.61

2013-11-08
Trinity (TX)
Texas Lutheran
3
2
25
13
25
19
22
25
22
25
15
13
GAME

68.38

2013-10-26 Sherman, Texas
Austin
Texas Lutheran
3
2
25
23
24
26
25
15
23
25
16
14
GAME

68.23

2013-11-09
Trinity (TX)
Southwestern (TX)
3
2
17
25
20
25
25
19
25
22
15
11
GAME

68.14

2013-09-29 Georgetown, Texas
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
2
3
25
19
18
25
25
22
21
25
8
15
GAME

67.51

2013-11-08
Colorado Col.
Dallas
3
1
25
17
23
25
25
21
25
21
GAME

66.99

2013-10-26 Sherman, Texas
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
3
0
26
24
25
22
25
12

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 33.6341
2 26.4277
3 25.5967
4 20.6565
5 20.5349
6 18.5960
7 18.4326
8 18.3674
9 17.9248
10 17.7882

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.8872
2 14.4460
3 10.7811
4 10.6209
5 9.7415
6 9.4522
7 9.3345
8 8.9201
9 8.7881
10 8.0230

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.9370
2 18.7128
3 17.7469
4 17.0932
5 16.9689
6 14.3532
7 13.7904
8 13.1763
9 11.5737
10 11.1507

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2437
2 0.2402
3 0.2207
4 0.2066
5 0.1935
6 0.1897
7 0.1874
8 0.1773
9 0.1770
10 0.1755

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1245
2 0.1235
3 0.1151
4 0.1095
5 0.1006
6 0.0980
7 0.0826
8 0.0807
9 0.0798
10 0.0794

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1885
2 0.1656
3 0.1633
4 0.1604
5 0.1588
6 0.1373
7 0.1286
8 0.1237
9 0.1212
10 0.1102


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek